CN101901298A - System and method for outputting maturity of communication product - Google Patents

System and method for outputting maturity of communication product Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN101901298A
CN101901298A CN2010101765318A CN201010176531A CN101901298A CN 101901298 A CN101901298 A CN 101901298A CN 2010101765318 A CN2010101765318 A CN 2010101765318A CN 201010176531 A CN201010176531 A CN 201010176531A CN 101901298 A CN101901298 A CN 101901298A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
product
level
defect
maturity
defects
Prior art date
Application number
CN2010101765318A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
孙磊
Original Assignee
上海闻泰电子科技有限公司
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 上海闻泰电子科技有限公司 filed Critical 上海闻泰电子科技有限公司
Priority to CN2010101765318A priority Critical patent/CN101901298A/en
Publication of CN101901298A publication Critical patent/CN101901298A/en

Links

Abstract

The invention discloses a system and a method for outputting maturity of a communication product. The method comprises the following steps of: firstly, dividing a plurality of defect severity level data according to quality defects, wherein each defect severity level has a corresponding weighting coefficient; secondly, determining a defect severity level weighting coefficient of the quality defect of a received product; thirdly, determining a product defect improvement level weighting coefficient of the quality defect of the product received by a product information receiving module; and finally, calculating the product of the defect severity level weighting coefficient of the quality defect of each product and the product defect improvement level weighting coefficient by using a maturity calculating model, adding all the products to obtain a maturity value, and outputting the maturity value. The system and the method effectively ensure the progress of a product development project and well prevent the project quality at the same time by calculating and controlling the maturity of the product.

Description

一种通讯产品成熟度输出系统及方法 A communication product maturity output system and method

技术领域 FIELD

[0001] 本发明涉及通讯领域,特别涉及一种通讯产品成熟度输出系统及方法。 [0001] The present invention relates to the field of communications, particularly to a communication product maturity output system and method. 背景技术 Background technique

[0002] 2000年以前,移动通讯终端产品的开发技术基本被欧美及日韩等巨头所垄断,中国仅仅作为OEM的加工基地出现在产业链的末端。 [0002] the year 2000, the development of mobile communication terminal products technology base is dominated by giants such as Europe, America and Japan and South Korea, China appears only as an OEM processing base at the end of the industrial chain. 近年来,世界移动通讯终端产品行业(特别是手机行业)发生了巨大变革,这场变革不仅打破了国内手机行业的传统格局,还在很大程度上改变了整个世界的手机产业格局。 In recent years, the world's mobile communication terminal products industry (especially in the mobile phone industry) has undergone tremendous change, this transformation is not only to break the traditional pattern of the domestic mobile phone industry, the industry is still largely changed the pattern of the entire world of mobile phones. 尤其令人振奋的是,在这场突如其来的变革中, 涌现出了一大批优秀的国内企业,他们的业务涵盖了从方案开发,ID/MD设计,生产制造,整合销售等整个手机产业链的所有环节。 Especially exciting is that this sudden change, the emergence of a large number of outstanding domestic enterprises, their business ranging from program development, ID / MD design, manufacturing, sales integration of the entire mobile phone industry chain All links. 中国从最大的手机制造基地逐步转变成集手机设计开发制造于一体的中心。 China to gradually shift from the largest mobile phone manufacturing base into a set of mobile phone design, development and manufacturing in one center.

[0003] 近2年来,随着国内手机产业的不断发展,国外品牌市场占有率下滑,国产新产品有更多的机会去分享市场。 [0003] the past two years, with the continuous development of the domestic mobile phone industry, foreign brand market share decline in the domestic new products have more opportunities to share the market. 3G这一新兴概念的异军突起,给通讯行业带来了巨大的商机,同时也给手机的设计研发公司带来了巨大的机遇和挑战。 3G sudden emergence of this new concept to the communications industry has brought great business opportunities, but also brought great opportunities and challenges for handset design and development company. 国家部委对3G的大力扶持,运营商的策略对3G产品的倾斜,促使了手机产业链呈现一个百花齐放,百家争鸣的格局。 National ministries strong support for 3G, the operator's policy to tilt 3G products, prompted the mobile phone industry chain presents a Hundred Flowers pattern.

[0004] 不过随着产业链的发展,进入门槛的逐步降低,也使得手机设计行业的竞争愈发激烈。 [0004] However, with the development of the industrial chain, and gradually reduce the threshold to enter, but also makes competition in the mobile phone design industry increasingly fierce. 而2008年席卷全球的金融危机,更给手机设计公司带来的前所未有的压力。 The 2008 global financial crisis, but also to mobile phone design companies to bring unprecedented pressure. 2008年虽然中国总体手机产量增长了2%,都是前2个季度的积累,第三第四季度都是负增长,11 月降幅甚至高达38%!在金融危机的严峻考验下,手机设计公司面临着巨大的挑战。 While in 2008 China's total mobile phone production increased by 2%, is the accumulation of the first two quarters of negative growth in the third and fourth quarter are, in November fell even up to 38%! In the severe test of the financial crisis, companies face handset design enormous challenges. 对于手机设计公司来说,产品的开发周期就是生命。 For mobile phone design company, the product development cycle is life. 2004至2007年,手机设计公司都搭上了中国经济高速发展的动车组,处于经济上升期,在不需要刻意关注成本的情况下,利润也是非常可观的。 From 2004 to 2007, mobile phone design companies have jumped on EMU China's rapid economic development, in an economic upswing, without the need for deliberately concerned about the cost, the profit is very impressive. 而在目前金融危机的大环境下,企业纷纷采取了开源节流的管理方式来有效地控制运营成本以使公司能存活下来。 And in the environment of the current financial crisis, companies have taken to cut expenditure management to effectively control operating costs in order to enable the company to survive. 而开源节流最直接,最有效的方法就是提高项目的成功率,减少设计失败成本,与此同时还要保证开发周期有足够的竞争力。 The cut costs the most direct and effective way is to increase the success rate of the project, designed to reduce the cost of failure, but also to ensure the development cycle at the same time there is competitive enough. 这也是企业是否能够将压力挑战转化为发展机遇的关键。 This is also the key to whether a company can be transformed into opportunities for development of pressure challenge.

发明内容 SUMMARY

[0005] 本发明的目的是提供一种通讯产品成熟度输出系统及方法,其能对通讯产品在开发及量试阶段的成熟度进行计算和输出。 [0005] The object of the present invention is to provide a communications product maturity output system and method, which can correspond to the product output is calculated and the amount of development and the maturity stage of the test.

[0006] 一方面,本发明提供一种通讯产品成熟度输出系统,包括: [0006] In one aspect, the present invention provides a communications product maturity output system, comprising:

[0007] 数据库,存储所述通讯产品的质量缺陷以及根据质量缺陷划分的若干缺陷严重等级数据,所述每个缺陷严重等级均具有相应的权重系数; [0007] database, storing the communication quality defects of products according to the level data and the serious quality defects divided several drawbacks, the severity level of each defect having a respective weighting factor;

[0008] 产品信息接收模块,用以接收产品的质量缺陷信息并调用所述数据库确定所述接收的产品的质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数并输出; [0008] Product information receiving module for receiving product quality defect information database and invokes the serious defect determination level of the right quality defects of products received and outputting a weight coefficient;

[0009] 产品缺陷改善程度模块,用以根据设定的产品缺陷改善程度等级及其权重系数, 确定所述产品信息接收模块接收的产品质量缺陷对应的产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系 [0009] The degree of improvement in product defects module, to improve the level and extent of defects in accordance with the weighting coefficients set by determining the information receiving module receives the product quality defects of products corresponding to the degree of improvement of the defect product based ranking weighting

4[0010] 成熟度输出模块,用以根据所述产品信息接收模块接收的来自预定数量产品的质量缺陷,计算所述每个产品质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数与产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系数的积,再将所得到的每个积相加得到成熟度值并输出。 4 [0010] maturity output module for quality defects in accordance with a predetermined number of products from the product information received by the receiving module, is calculated for each of the product quality defect level of weighting coefficients serious defects and defects to improve the level of the right degree of weighting coefficients the product, each product then obtained by adding the obtained value and outputs maturity.

[0011] 所述系统还包括连接所述成熟度输出模块的阶段准入模块,用以将所述成熟度输出模块输出的成熟度值与预定的产品各阶段成熟度限制值进行比对,若小于则输出准入的提示信息。 [0011] The system further comprises a stage of maturity the connection admission module output module for the maturity value of the maturity of the output module with a predetermined product output various stages of maturity than the limit value, if less than the access prompt information is output.

[0012] 所述数据库存储的产品质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级包括四个等级,其中第一等级的权重系数为20,第二等级的权重系数为10,第三等级的权重系数为5,第四等级的权重系数为1。 [0012] the database storing product quality defect level comprises four grades serious defects, wherein the first level of the right weight factor of 20, a weight coefficient 10 for the second level, third level weighting factor is 5, the fourth weight class weight factor of 1.

[0013] 所述产品缺陷改善程度等级包括四个等级,其中第一等级的权重系数为1,第二等级的权重系数为2,第三等级的权重系数为3,第四等级的权重系数为4。 [0013] The degree of improvement in product defect levels include four levels, wherein the weight of the first level is a weight coefficient, a weight coefficient of a second level 2, the weight coefficient of the third level is 3, weight coefficient of the fourth level 4.

[0014] 所述成熟度输出模块还包括用以计算成熟度值的成熟度计算模型: [0014] The maturity of the output module further comprises means for calculating maturity maturity value calculation model:

[0015] [0015]

[0016] 其中:S—缺陷严重等级权重系数; [0016] wherein: S- defect severity level weighting coefficient;

[0017] e——缺陷改善程度等级权重系数; [0017] e-- defect level to improve the degree of weighting coefficients;

[0018] X(s, e)——对应缺陷严重等级的缺陷数量。 [0018] X (s, e) - the number of defects corresponding to the defect severity levels.

[0019] 所述产品信息接收模块在产品的样件阶段、中试阶段、小批量阶段、量产阶段分别接收来自不同数量产品的质量缺陷信息。 [0019] The product information receiving module in the sample stage of the product, in the test phase, small quantities stage, production stage receive a different number of products from a mass of defect information.

[0020] 另一方面,本发明还提供一种通讯产品成熟度输出方法,包括以下步骤: [0020] another aspect, the present invention also provides a communications product maturity output method comprising the steps of:

[0021] Si、建立数据库,存储所述通讯产品的质量缺陷以及根据质量缺陷划分的若干缺陷严重等级数据,所述每个缺陷严重等级均具有相应的权重系数; [0021] Si, the establishment of a database, storing the communication quality defects of products according to the level data and the serious quality defects divided several drawbacks, the severity level of each defect having a respective weighting factor;

[0022] S2、接收产品的质量缺陷信息并调用所述数据库确定所述接收的产品的质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数并输出; [0022] S2, the reception quality of the product defect information and invokes the database to determine the right level of quality defects serious defect of the product received and outputting a weight coefficient;

[0023] S3、根据设定的产品缺陷改善程度等级及其权重系数,确定所述产品信息接收模块接收的产品质量缺陷对应的产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系数; [0023] S3, the set level of product defects and their weights according to degree of improvement weighting coefficient, to determine the product quality information receiving module receives the defective product defects corresponding to improvement in the degree of level weighting coefficient;

[0024] S4、根据所述步骤S2接收的来自预定数量产品的质量缺陷,计算所述每个产品质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数与产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系数的积,再将所得到的每个积相加得到成熟度值并输出。 [0024] S4, in accordance with a predetermined number of quality defects of products from said receiving step S2, calculating the product quality defects each defect severity level weighting factor to improve the product and product defect was severe grade coefficient weights, and then the resulting each product obtained by adding the output value, and maturity.

[0025] 所述方法还包括阶段准入步骤:用以将所述步骤S4输出的成熟度值与预定的产品各阶段成熟度限制值进行比对,若小于则输出准入的提示信息。 [0025] The method further comprises the step of admission phases: to maturity in step S4 the output value with a predetermined limit value of the various stages of maturity products for comparison, if the message is less than the output access.

[0026] 所述数据库存储的产品质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级包括四个等级,其中第一等级的权重系数为20,第二等级的权重系数为10,第三等级的权重系数为5,第四等级的权重系数为1 ;所述步骤S3中产品缺陷改善程度等级包括四个等级,其中第一等级的权重系数为1, 第二等级的权重系数为2,第三等级的权重系数为3,第四等级的权重系数为4。 [0026] the database storing product quality defect level comprises four grades serious defects, wherein the first level of the right weight factor of 20, a weight coefficient 10 for the second level, third level weighting factor is 5, the fourth weight coefficient for level 1; the step S3, the degree of improvement in product defect levels include four levels, wherein the weighting factor is a first level, a second level of the right weight factor of 2, the weight coefficient of the third level 3, fourth grade right weight factor of 4.

[0027] 所述步骤S4按照以下计算模型计算成熟度: [0027] The step S4 is calculated according to the following calculation model maturity:

[0028] [0028]

5成熟度值=ZZsxexx (s, e) 5 maturity value = ZZsxexx (s, e)

s=A e=l s = A e = l

[0029] 其中:S—缺陷严重等级权重系数; [0029] wherein: S- defect severity level weighting coefficient;

[0030] e——缺陷改善程度等级权重系数; [0030] e-- defect level to improve the degree of weighting coefficients;

[0031] X(s, e)——对应缺陷严重等级的缺陷数量。 [0031] X (s, e) - the number of defects corresponding to the defect severity levels.

[0032] 采用本发明所述的一种通讯产品成熟度输出系统及方法,首先利用数据库存储所述通讯产品的质量缺陷以及根据质量缺陷划分的若干缺陷严重等级数据,所述每个缺陷严重等级均具有相应的权重系数;其次通过产品信息接收模块接收产品的质量缺陷信息并调用所述数据库确定所述接收的产品的质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数并输出;通过产品缺陷改善程度模块根据设定的产品缺陷改善程度等级及其权重系数,确定所述产品信息接收模块接收的产品质量缺陷对应的产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系数;最后利用成熟度输出模块,根据所述产品信息接收模块接收的来自预定数量产品的质量缺陷,计算所述每个产品质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数与产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系数的积,再将所得到的每个积相加得到成熟度值并输出。 [0032] The output product maturity A communication system and method of the present invention, firstly a database storing the communication quality defects and serious product defect level data based on a number of quality defects division, the severity level of each defect each having a respective weighting factor; second reception quality of the product through the product information receiving module defect information and calls the database to determine the defect severity level weighting factor of quality defects of the received products and an output; through defects degree of improvement module according to provided predetermined level and the degree of improvement in product defects weighting coefficient, to determine the product information receiving module receives the product quality defects corresponding to the degree of improvement defects grade weighting coefficient; Finally maturity output module, in accordance with the product information received by the receiving module from a predetermined number of quality defects of products, calculates the product quality defects each defect severity level of product defects weighting factor improving product was severe grade coefficient weights, each product then obtained by adding the obtained value and outputs maturity. 本发明通过对产品成熟度的计算和控制,有效地保证了产品开发项目的进度,同时项目质量也得到了很好的预防。 The invention of product maturity calculation and control, effectively ensure the progress of product development projects, and project quality has been very good prevention.

附图说明 BRIEF DESCRIPTION

[0033] 图1为本发明所述系统的框图; [0033] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the system of the present invention;

[0034] 图2为本发明所述方法的流程图; [0034] FIG 2 is a flowchart of the method of the present invention;

[0035] 图3为本发明的流程原理图。 [0035] FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of the invention.

具体实施方式 Detailed ways

[0036] 下面结合附图和实施例进一步说明本发明的技术方案。 [0036] The following examples further illustrate and aspect of the present invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

[0037] 参照图1,图1显示了本发明提供的一种通讯产品成熟度输出系统100,包括: [0037] Referring to FIG. 1, FIG. 1 shows a communications product maturity output system 100 according to the present invention is provided, comprising:

[0038] 数据库101,存储所述通讯产品的质量缺陷以及根据质量缺陷划分的若干缺陷严重等级数据,所述每个缺陷严重等级均具有相应的权重系数。 [0038] database 101, the communication quality of the defective memory products, and according to several serious defect level data quality defects divided, each of the defect severity level having a respective weighting factor. 所述数据库101存储的产品质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级包括四个等级,其中第一等级的权重系数为20,第二等级的权重系数为10,第三等级的权重系数为5,第四等级的权重系数为1。 The database 101 stores the defect product quality defect severity level comprises four grades, wherein the weight of the first weight coefficient level 20, level weight of the second weight coefficient is 10, the right level of the third weight coefficient is 5, the fourth level weighting factor of 1.

[0039] 具体来讲,缺陷严重等级具体定义如下: [0039] Specifically, the defect severity level defined as follows:

[0040] A级(权重20):此类缺陷会导致手机无法满足认证要求(比如射频、EMC、安全等) 或不满足法律法规及其他强制标准要求 [0040] A class (weight 20): This type of defect can cause the phone can not meet the certification requirements (such as radio frequency, EMC, safety, etc.) or does not meet the laws and regulations and other mandatory standards

[0041] B级(权重10):此类缺陷会导致客户拒收或导致产品无法生产 [0041] Level B (Weight 10): This type of defect can cause rejection or cause the product to the customer can not produce

[0042] C级(权重5):此类缺陷不会对产品主要功能造成影响,但可能无法被有些客户接受而拒收,或者会影响生产的难易度;其他客户虽然能接受,但是会使客户不满意,因而影响品牌的信誉 [0042] C-class (weight 5): This defect does not affect the main function of the product, but some customers may not be accepted and rejected, or it will affect the ease of production; although other clients can accept, but will the customer is not satisfied, thus affecting the credibility of the brand

[0043] D级(权重1):此类缺陷只是轻微的瑕疵,不会影响产品性能及生产,出现频率很低,一般仅在内部专业测试时才会发现。 [0043] Class D (weight 1): such defects only minor flaw does not affect product performance and production, the frequency of occurrence is very low, usually only found in the in-house expertise will be tested.

[0044] 下面的缺陷列表中例举了不同严重等级的主要缺陷: [0044] The following list of defects is exemplified in the major defects of different severity levels:

[0045] [0045]

6A 级.、.. * . ■ ■■ .. . B 级- ......C级 D级无法开机 功耗大幅超过标准 电流值高于标准20% 电流值略高于标准无法通话 待机时间低于标准>30% 音量略高于标准一定值 音量略低于标准SAR超标 射频性能低于标准 非常用软件功能失效 非常用界面下用户不容易发现问题有害物质超标 音量明显低于标准 偶发的界面显示错误 功能性失效 通话质量明显差于标准 外观瑕疵 内部测试模式下的非功能性失效电池爆燃 315投诉热点问题 弱场通话略差于标准 音量超过安全值 常用软件功能失效 环境测试后外观瑕疵 目视条件下不会发现的外观瑕疵 经常出现重启、白屏 寿命测试略低于标准 用户界面显示错乱 机械测试略低于标准 环境测试后可恢复缺陷 寿命测试明显低于标准 表面涂层耐用性略低于标准 机械测试后可恢复缺陷 环境测试后主功能失效 使用手感不佳 机械测试 .. 6A level, .. * ■ ■■ .. Class B -. ...... C Class D power stage does not turn more than the standard current value substantially higher than the standard 20% of the current value slightly higher than the standard can not call standby lower than the standard time> 30% of the volume is slightly higher than the standard volume of slightly less than a predetermined value exceeding the standard SAR RF performance is lower than the standard software interface function failure by the user is not easy to find the volume of harmful substances exceeding significantly lower than the standard incidental interface after error functional failure call quality is worse than the non-functional dead battery 315 complaints knocking hot issue in the standard cosmetic defects internal test mode call weak field slightly worse than the standard volume value exceeds the safety function failure commonly used software testing environment cosmetic defects mesh depending on the conditions do not often found in cosmetic defects restart, slightly lower than the black and white standard life test user interface display slightly lower than the standard mechanical testing disorder after environmental testing recoverable defect significantly lower than the standard life test the durability of the surface coating slightly after mechanical testing standard recoverable defect environmental test failures using poor hand rear main function mechanical testing 后主功能失效 增加装配复杂度问题 Emperor function failure increases assembly complexity issues

[0046] 产品信息接收模块102,用以接收产品的质量缺陷信息并调用所述数据库101确定所述接收的产品的质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数并输出。 [0046] Product information receiving module 102, configured to receive the product quality and defect information of the database 101 calls the defect determination level of serious quality defects weighting coefficients of the received and outputs the product.

[0047] 产品缺陷改善程度模块103,用以根据设定的产品缺陷改善程度等级及其权重系数,确定所述产品信息接收模块102接收的产品质量缺陷对应的产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系数。 [0047] The degree of improvement in product defects module 103 to improve the degree of defect levels and the weight coefficient according to the set product, determining the product information receiving module 102 receives the defective product quality defects corresponding to the degree of improvement rank weighting coefficient. 所述产品缺陷改善程度等级包括四个等级,其中第一等级的权重系数为1,第二等级的权重系数为2,第三等级的权重系数为3,第四等级的权重系数为4。 The degree of improvement in product defect levels include four levels, wherein the weight of the first weight coefficient is 1 level, a second level of the right weight factor of 2, the weight coefficient of the third level 3, weight coefficient of the fourth level is 4.

[0048] 缺陷改善程度等级分为4个等级,具体定义如下: [0048] The degree of improvement in defect levels are classified into four classes, defined as follows:

[0049] 4级(权重4):问题原因未知——问题发生的根本原因未找到或问题无法重现出的。 [0049] Level 4 (weight 4): Problem Cause unknown - the root cause of the problem could not be found or could not reproduce the problem. 不过,也可能出现在没有确定根本原因的情况下找到了改善方法的情况。 However, it may also appear to find ways to improve the situation in the absence of determining root cause.

[0050] 3级(权重3):改善方法未知——改善方法没有找到或者还没有足够的论证(通过计算,论据或手工模型及仿真等方式)证明改善措施有效 [0050] level (weighting 3) 3: improved method unknown - to improve the method is not found or there is not enough proof (by calculation, arguments or manual model and simulation, etc.) proved effective improvement measures

[0051] 2级(权重2):改善方法未确认——改善方法已经被论证但尚未被实际确认(通过测试或被认可); [0051] Level 2 (weight of 2): a method for improving unacknowledged - improved method has been demonstrated but not yet actually been confirmed (or recognized by testing);

[0052] 1级(权重1):改善方法未应用到生产——方法已经确认,不过可能由于需要准备时间等原因改善方法尚未应用到生产。 [0052] level (weight 1) 1: Improving the method does not apply to production - the method has been confirmed, but may be due to the need to improve the method of preparation time and other reasons have not been applied to production.

[0053] 成熟度输出模块104,用以根据所述产品信息接收模块102接收的来自预定数量产品的质量缺陷,计算所述每个产品质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数与产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系数的积,再将所得到的每个积相加得到成熟度值并输出。 [0053] Maturity output module 104, according to a predetermined number of quality defects of products from the product information received by the receiving module 102 calculates the product quality defects each defect severity level of product defects weighting coefficient weighting the degree of improvement rating each product coefficient product, and then the resultant value obtained by adding the maturity and outputs.

[0054] 所述成熟度输出模块104还包括用以计算成熟度值的成熟度计算模型: [0054] The maturity output module 104 further comprises a calculation model for calculating the maturity value of maturity:

[0055] [0055]

成熟度值sMe=1 Maturity value sMe = 1

[0056] 其中:S——缺陷严重等级权重系数; [0056] wherein: S-- defect severity level weighting coefficient;

[0057] e——缺陷改善程度等级权重系数; [0057] e-- defect level to improve the degree of weighting coefficients;

[0058] X(s, e)——对应缺陷严重等级的缺陷数量。 [0058] X (s, e) - the number of defects corresponding to the defect severity levels.

[0059] 产品信息接收模块102在产品的样件阶段、中试阶段、小批量阶段、量产阶段分别接收来自不同数量产品的质量缺陷信息。 [0059] Product information receiving module 102 in the sample stage of the product, in the test phase, small quantities stage, production stage receive a different number of products from a mass of defect information. 作为一实施例,每一阶段对应的标准抽样数量如下: As an example, the standard number of samples corresponding to each stage are as follows:

[0060] 样件阶段:12台 [0060] The sample stage: stage 12

[0061] 中试阶段:40台 [0061] The pilot phase: 40

[0062] 小批量阶段:85台 [0062] small quantities stage: 85 units

[0063] 对于样品进行检测后发现的缺陷依照以下原则进行计数: [0063] For the detection of defects found in the samples is counted in accordance with the following principles:

[0064] 1)在产品测试中发现的每个问题,都计算为一个缺陷; [0064] 1) each of the problems found in the test product are calculated as a defect;

[0065] 2)在不同类别的测试中发现的同一现象缺陷,必须计算为不同的缺陷,因为导致问题发生的原因可能是不同的(例如在做跌落试验和环境实验中都出现了LCD显示屏破裂的现象,就记为2个缺陷) [0065] 2) of the same phenomenon defects found in different types of tests must be calculated for different defects occur because the cause of the problem may be different (for example, do drop test and environmental experiments have emerged LCD display rupture of the phenomenon, counts as two defects)

[0066] 3)在一项测试中发现的不同器件的缺陷点必须分别计算为不同的缺陷(比如在跌落试验中有2个元件发生破损,就应该计为2个缺陷) [0066] 3) defective points different devices found in a test must be calculated separately for different defects (such as in a drop test breakage has two elements, it should be counted as two defects)

[0067] 4)在没有明显的证据表明2个问题的发生有着相关性的情况下,每个问题应单独作为一个缺陷列出(例如:手机天线弹簧损坏,发射功率强度不达标,灵敏度不合格这几个缺陷) [0067] 4) in the absence of clear evidence of the occurrence of two problems with the case where the correlation, each question should be listed as a single defect (e.g.: mobile phone antenna damage to the spring, is not up to the transmission power strength, sensitivity failure these defects)

[0068] 5)如果特殊情况下抽样数量变动,缺陷计数后需要乘以系数,系数的计算方法为: f=实际抽样数量/标准抽样数量。 [0068] 5) If the number of samples in special circumstances change, the need for defect counts multiplied by the coefficient, the coefficient is calculated: f = the actual number of sample / standard number of samples.

[0069] 阶段准入模块105,用以将所述成熟度输出模块104输出的成熟度值与预定的产品各阶段成熟度限制值进行比对,若小于则输出准入的提示信息。 [0069] module 105 phase access for the maturity value of the maturity and the output module 104 outputs a predetermined stage of maturity each product a limit value for comparison, if the message is less than the output access.

[0070] 准入中试阶段:< 800 [0070] Access Pilot Phase: <800

[0071] 准入小批量阶段:< 300,且不能有(4,A)、(3,A)和(4,B)问题。 [0071] Access Phase small quantities: <300, and can not have (4, A), (3, A), and (4, B) problem.

[0072]准入量产阶段:< 150,且不能有(4,A)、(3,A)、(2,A)、(3,B)和(4,B)问题。 [0072] Access production phase: <150, and can not have (4, A), (3, A), (2, A), (3, B), and (4, B) problem.

[0073] 阶段目标的设定,主要参考了手机的质量要求,同时依据实际开发经验,并结合客户及最终用户的关注问题及需求,衡量了项目开发的进度要求和改善周期,经过评估和修改,最后设立的合理标准。 [0073] milestones set, the phone's main reference quality requirements, while based on the actual development experience, combined with the concerns and needs of customers and end-users, and to measure the progress required to improve project development cycle, evaluated and modified Finally, the establishment of a reasonable standard.

[0074] 当然,对于每个设计行业,由于各有其特殊性,标准的设立可以根据自身的特别再 [0074] Of course, for each design industry, because of its specificity have, according to their own standards established again particularly

8进行调整以更符合实际情况。 8 to be adjusted to a more realistic situation.

[0075] 例如某一项目在中试阶段,尚未进入小批量阶段前进行了相关系列测试,发现了一些问题,经过改善措施的确定后,具体分布如下表: [0075] For example a project in the pilot phase, has not been carried out before the stage of small quantities into the relevant series of tests, found some problems, after determining the improvement measures, the specific distribution in the following table:

[0076] MUST (成熟度)矩阵模型表: [0076] MUST (maturity) matrix model table:

[0077] [0077]

[0078] 指标计算过程如下: [0078] The index is calculated as follows:

[0079] “A,,:20x [ (4x1) + (3x0) + (2x0) + (1x0) ] = 80 [0079] "A ,,: 20x [(4x1) + (3x0) + (2x0) + (1x0)] = 80

[0080] “B” : IOx [ (4x2) + (3x3) + (2x0) + (1x0) ] = 170 [0080] "B": IOx [(4x2) + (3x3) + (2x0) + (1x0)] = 170

[0081] “C” :5x[ (4x0)+ (3x4)+ (2x3)+ (1x0)] =90 [0081] "C": 5x [(4x0) + (3x4) + (2x3) + (1x0)] = 90

[0082] “D” : Ix [ (4x0) + (3x5) + (2x4) + (1x0) ] = 23 [0082] "D": Ix [(4x0) + (3x5) + (2x4) + (1x0)] = 23

[0083] MUST 指标=80+170+90+23 = 363 [0083] MUST Index = 80 + 90 + 170 + 23 = 363

[0084] 由于指标计算结果超过目标,所以项目必须经过进一步改善,当前状态不能够进入小批量阶段。 [0084] Since the index calculation result exceeds the target, so the project must be further improved, the current state is not able to enter the small-volume stage.

[0085] 参见图2,本发明还提供一种通讯产品成熟度输出方法200,包括以下步骤: [0085] Referring to Figure 2, the present invention also provides a method of communications product maturity output 200, comprising the steps of:

[0086] Si、建立数据库,存储所述通讯产品的质量缺陷以及根据质量缺陷划分的若干缺陷严重等级数据,所述每个缺陷严重等级均具有相应的权重系数; [0086] Si, the establishment of a database, storing the communication quality defects of products according to the level data and the serious quality defects divided several drawbacks, the severity level of each defect having a respective weighting factor;

[0087] S2、接收产品的质量缺陷信息并调用所述数据库确定所述接收的产品的质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数并输出; [0087] S2, the reception quality of the product defect information and invokes the database to determine the right level of quality defects serious defect of the product received and outputting a weight coefficient;

[0088] S3、根据设定的产品缺陷改善程度等级及其权重系数,确定所述产品信息接收模块接收的产品质量缺陷对应的产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系数; [0088] S3, the set level of product defects and their weights according to degree of improvement weighting coefficient, to determine the product quality information receiving module receives the defective product defects corresponding to improvement in the degree of level weighting coefficient;

[0089] S4、根据所述步骤S2接收的来自预定数量产品的质量缺陷,计算所述每个产品质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数与产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系数的积,再将所得到的每个积相加得到成熟度值并输出。 [0089] S4, in accordance with a predetermined number of quality defects of products from said receiving step S2, calculating the product quality defects each defect severity level weighting factor to improve the product and product defect was severe grade coefficient weights, and then the resulting each product obtained by adding the output value, and maturity.

[0090] S5、阶段准入步骤:用以将所述步骤S4输出的成熟度值与预定的产品各阶段成熟度限制值进行比对,若小于则输出准入的提示信息。 [0090] S5, Step phase access: for the maturity value of the step S4 and the predetermined product output various stages of maturity limit values ​​for comparison, if less than the access message is output. [0091] 作为一实施例,所述数据库存储的产品质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级包括四个等级, 其中第一等级的权重系数为20,第二等级的权重系数为10,第三等级的权重系数为5,第四等级的权重系数为1 ;所述步骤S3中产品缺陷改善程度等级包括四个等级,其中第一等级的权重系数为1,第二等级的权重系数为2,第三等级的权重系数为3,第四等级的权重系数为4。 [0091] As an example, the defective product defect severity level of the stored database includes four levels, the first level where the weight coefficient is a weight 20, a weight coefficient 10 for the second level, the third level of the right weighting factor 5, the right level of the fourth weight coefficient is 1; defect level comprises four grades the degree of improvement in the product of the step S3, wherein the weight of the first weight coefficient is 1 level, a second level of the right weight factor of 2, the third level a weight factor of 3, the right level of the fourth weight coefficient is 4.

[0092] 所述步骤S4按照以下计算模型计算成熟度: [0092] The step S4 is calculated according to the following calculation model maturity:

[0093] [0093]

D 4 D 4

成熟度值=ZZsxexx (s,e) Maturity value = ZZsxexx (s, e)

S=A e=l S = A e = l

[0094] 其中:S—缺陷严重等级权重系数; [0094] wherein: S- defect severity level weighting coefficient;

[0095] e——缺陷改善程度等级权重系数; [0095] e-- defect level to improve the degree of weighting coefficients;

[0096] X(s, e)——对应缺陷严重等级的缺陷数量。 [0096] X (s, e) - the number of defects corresponding to the defect severity levels.

[0097] 参考图3,图3是本发明的流程原理图,下面通过一个具体的实施例来阐述一下本发明: [0097] Referring to FIG 3, FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of the present invention, the following the present invention to elaborate a specific embodiment by:

[0098] 在项目的定义阶段,项目组在识别并确认项目要求后,制定了项目计划,并对各个阶段的节点明确定义了MUST(成熟度)阶段目标: [0098] In the definition phase of the project, the project team identified and confirmed after the project requirements, develop a project plan, and a clear definition of the various stages of the node MUST (maturity) phase objectives:

[0099] 准入中试阶段:< 800 [0099] Access Pilot Phase: <800

[0100] 准入小批量阶段:< 300,且不能有(4,A)、(3,A)和(4,B)问题。 [0100] Access Phase small quantities: <300, and can not have (4, A), (3, A), and (4, B) problem.

[0101]准入量产阶段:< 150,且不能有(4,A)、(3,A)、(2,A)、(3,B)和(4,B)问题。 [0101] Access production phase: <150, and can not have (4, A), (3, A), (2, A), (3, B), and (4, B) problem.

[0102] 在样件阶段的测试完成后,依照MUST矩阵计算出了当前的MUST指标(见下表): [0102] After the completion of the test sample stage, a matrix calculation in accordance MUST MUST current indicator (see table below):

[0103] MUST矩阵指标 [0103] MUST matrix indicators

[0104] [0104]

[0105] 经过计算MUST指标符合阶段目标而且比较安全,经项目组评审讨论,决定项目可以进入到中试阶段,改善验证和优化同步进行,项目进度得到提前。 [0105] After calculation MUST indicators in line with milestones and relatively safe, reviewed by the project team to discuss and decide the project can enter the pilot phase, to improve verification and optimization simultaneously, to get ahead of the project schedule.

[0106] 在中试阶段按照测试计划进行了完整的测试后,依照分类测试的结果项目组汇总了所有的缺陷和分析措施,并定义了严重度和改善度(见下表)。 After the [0106] has been fully tested in accordance with test plans in the pilot stage, the project team in accordance with the results of classification tests summary of all defects and analyze measures and defines the severity and degree of improvement (see table below).

[0107] 中试阶段缺陷汇总表 [0107] Summary of the pilot stage of the defect

[0108] [0108]

[0109] 项目组评审讨论之后认为,虽然指标数266达到了< 300的阶段目标,但接近于阶段目标值,为了确保小批量阶段顺利通过,对于(B,3)级的4个缺陷,项目组专门手工制作了改善试验品后对其中可靠性的3项进行了模拟验证测试,确认了改善措施的有效性。 [0109] Having discussed the project team reviews that, although the stage number reaches the target indicators 266 <300, but close to the target phase, in order to ensure the smooth phase by small quantities, for the four defects (B, 3) level of the project after a special set of handmade goods to improve test reliability of which three were simulated verification tests to confirm the effectiveness of improvement measures. 此时,MUST指标降低为166(见下表),项目顺利通过节点评审: At this time, the MUST indicators reduced to 166 (see table below), projects have successfully passed the assessment node:

[0110] 中试阶段MUST矩阵指标 MUST phase matrix indicator [0110] Pilot

[0111] [0111]

[0112] 因之前各阶段进行了严格控制,小批量阶段生产顺利进行,经过测试后发现,绝大多数缺陷都改善有效,MUST指标计算出来也非常令人满意(见下表): [0112] because before each stage were strictly controlled, low-volume production stage smoothly, after a test found that most defects are improving effective, MUST also very satisfactory index calculated (see table below):

[0113] 小批量阶段MUST矩阵指标[0114] [0113] low-volume phase MUST matrix index [0114]

[0115] 项目顺利转入量产阶段,整个项目组在利用了MUST系统进行控制后,有效地保证了项目的进度,同时项目的质量也得到了很好的预防,给其他新项目采用MUST系统做出了一个优秀的典范。 [0115] Item smoothly into mass production, the entire project team MUST use the control system, effectively ensure the progress of the program, while the quality of the program has been well prevention, new items to other systems use MUST He made a good model.

[0116] 量产之后,项目组进行了前40,000台产品的质量跟踪,不良率为1400PPM,对比未使用MUST系统前的量产阶段产品平均不良水准2700PPM,降低了近50%,有效提高了量产阶段产品的质量,提升了客户的满意度。 After the [0116] production, the quality of the project group 40,000 before tracing products, performing rate 1400 ppm, Comparative unused pre-production phase system MUST defective product average level 2700 ppm, it is reduced by nearly 50%, improve the production stage of the product quality, enhance customer satisfaction.

[0117] 需要指出的是,本发明所述的一种通讯产品成熟度输出系统100和一种通讯产品成熟度输出方法200,两者在原理和实施例上是相同或类似的,故重复部分不再赘述。 [0117] It should be noted that one of the products of the present invention, the communication maturity A communication system 100 and the output product maturity output method 200, both in principle and examples are the same or similar, so that repetitive portion No longer.

[0118] 本技术领域中的普通技术人员应当认识到,以上的实施例仅是用来说明本发明, 而并非用作为对本发明的限定,只要在本发明的实质精神范围内,对以上实施例的变化、变型都将落在本发明的权利要求书范围内。 [0118] skilled in the art should appreciate that the above embodiments are merely to illustrate the present invention and are not used to limit the present invention, as long as within the true spirit of the invention, the above embodiments variations, modifications are claimed in the present invention fall within the scope of claims.

Claims (10)

  1. 一种通讯产品成熟度输出系统,其特征在于,包括:数据库,存储所述通讯产品的质量缺陷以及根据质量缺陷划分的若干缺陷严重等级数据,所述每个缺陷严重等级均具有相应的权重系数;产品信息接收模块,用以接收产品的质量缺陷信息并调用所述数据库确定所述接收的产品的质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数并输出;产品缺陷改善程度模块,用以根据设定的产品缺陷改善程度等级及其权重系数,确定所述产品信息接收模块接收的产品质量缺陷对应的产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系数;成熟度输出模块,用以根据所述产品信息接收模块接收的来自预定数量产品的质量缺陷,计算所述每个产品质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数与产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系数的积,再将所得到的每个积相加得到成熟度值并输出。 A communication product maturity output system comprising: a database, storing the communication quality defects and product quality defects divided according to several drawbacks severity rating data, each of the defect severity level having a respective weighting factor ; product information receiving module for receiving product quality defect information and defect determining call quality defects in the database of the product received severity level and outputting a weight coefficient; defects degree of improvement module, configured according to the set product level and degree of improvement defect weighting coefficient, to determine the product quality information receiving module receives the defective product defects corresponding to improvement in the degree of level weighting coefficient; maturity output module for a predetermined number of products from the information receiving module according to the quality defects of products, calculates the product quality defects each defect severity level weighting coefficient degree of improvement to a product defect product weight coefficient level weight, then each product obtained by adding the obtained value and outputs maturity.
  2. 2.如权利要求1所述的系统,其特征在于,所述系统还包括连接所述成熟度输出模块的阶段准入模块,用以将所述成熟度输出模块输出的成熟度值与预定的产品各阶段成熟度限制值进行比对,若小于则输出准入的提示信息。 2. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that the system further comprises a stage of maturity the connection admission module output module to maturity with a predetermined value to the maturity of the output module outputs product various stages of maturity limit values ​​for comparison, if less than the access message is output.
  3. 3.如权利要求1或2所述的系统,其特征在于,所述数据库存储的产品质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级包括四个等级,其中第一等级的权重系数为20,第二等级的权重系数为10,第三等级的权重系数为5,第四等级的权重系数为1。 The system as claimed in claim 12 or weighting factor to the second level, characterized in that the defective product defect severity level of the stored database includes four levels, the first level where the weight coefficient is a weight 20, 10, the right level of the third weight coefficient is 5, the fourth weight coefficient is 1 level.
  4. 4.如权利要求3所述的系统,其特征在于,所述产品缺陷改善程度等级包括四个等级, 其中第一等级的权重系数为1,第二等级的权重系数为2,第三等级的权重系数为3,第四等级的权重系数为4。 4. The system of claim 3, the third level, characterized in that the degree of improvement product defect levels include four levels, wherein the weight of the first weight coefficient is 1 level, a second level of the right weight factor of 2, a weight factor of 3, the right level of the fourth weight coefficient is 4.
  5. 5.如权利要求4所述的系统,其特征在于,所述成熟度输出模块还包括用以计算成熟度值的成熟度计算模型:D 4成熟度值=ΣΣ8χεχΧ (s,e)s=A e=l其中:s—缺陷严重等级权重系数;e——缺陷改善程度等级权重系数;X(s, e)——对应缺陷严重等级的缺陷数量。 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the output module further comprises a maturity maturity maturity calculation model used for calculating the value: D 4 maturity value = ΣΣ8χεχΧ (s, e) s = A e = l wherein: s- defect severity level weighting coefficient; E - defect level of the degree of improvement weighting coefficient; X (s, e) - the number of defects corresponding to the defect severity levels.
  6. 6.如权利要求5所述的系统,其特征在于,所述产品信息接收模块在产品的样件阶段、 中试阶段、小批量阶段、量产阶段分别接收来自不同数量产品的质量缺陷信息。 The system as claimed in claim 5, characterized in that the sample receiving product information in the product stage module, pilot stage, small quantities stage, production stage receive a different number of products from a mass of defect information.
  7. 7. —种通讯产品成熟度输出方法,其特征在于,包括以下步骤:`51、建立数据库,存储所述通讯产品的质量缺陷以及根据质量缺陷划分的若干缺陷严重等级数据,所述每个缺陷严重等级均具有相应的权重系数;`52、接收产品的质量缺陷信息并调用所述数据库确定所述接收的产品的质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数并输出;`53、根据设定的产品缺陷改善程度等级及其权重系数,确定所述产品信息接收模块接收的产品质量缺陷对应的产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系数;`54、根据所述步骤S2接收的来自预定数量产品的质量缺陷,计算所述每个产品质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级权重系数与产品缺陷改善程度等级权重系数的积,再将所得到的每个积相加得到成熟度值并输出。 7. - kind of product maturity output communication method, comprising the steps of: `51, to establish a database for storing the communication quality defects and severe product defect level data according to several quality defects divided, each of the defect severity level having a respective weighting factor; `52, the product quality of the received call defect information and the defect database to determine the reception quality defects of products severity level and outputs the weighting coefficients; 53 ', according to the set product defects level and degree of improvement weighting coefficient, to determine the product quality information receiving module receives the defective product defects corresponding to improvement in the degree of level weighting coefficient; 54 ', in accordance with a predetermined number of quality defects of products from said receiving step S2, the calculation each product quality defects of said defect severity level weighting factor to improve the product and product defect was severe grade coefficient weights, each product then obtained by adding the obtained value and outputs maturity.
  8. 8.如权利要求7所述的方法,其特征在于,所述方法还包括阶段准入步骤:用以将所述步骤S4输出的成熟度值与预定的产品各阶段成熟度限制值进行比对,若小于则输出准入的提示信息。 8. The method according to claim 7, wherein said method further comprises the step of admission phases: for the maturity value of the step S4 with a predetermined product output various stages of maturity compared to the limit value If the output is less than the access prompt information.
  9. 9.如权利要求7或8所述的方法,其特征在于,所述数据库存储的产品质量缺陷的缺陷严重等级包括四个等级,其中第一等级的权重系数为20,第二等级的权重系数为10,第三等级的权重系数为5,第四等级的权重系数为1 ;所述步骤S3中产品缺陷改善程度等级包括四个等级,其中第一等级的权重系数为1,第二等级的权重系数为2,第三等级的权重系数为3,第四等级的权重系数为4。 9. The method of claim 7 or 8 weight coefficient of the second level of the preceding claims, characterized in that the defective product defect severity level of the stored database includes four levels, the first level where the weight coefficient is a weight 20, 10, the right level of the third weight coefficient is 5, the right level of the fourth weight coefficient is 1; defect level comprises four grades the degree of improvement in the product of the step S3, wherein the weight of the first weight coefficient is 1 level, a second level of 2 is a weighting factor, weighting coefficients of the third level is 3, weight coefficient of the fourth level is 4.
  10. 10.如权利要求9所述的方法,其特征在于,所述步骤S4按照以下计算模型计算成熟 10. The method according to claim 9, wherein said step S4 is calculated according to the following calculation model mature 其中:s—缺陷严重等级权重系数;e——缺陷改善程度等级权重系数; X(s, e)——对应缺陷严重等级的缺陷数量。 Wherein: s- serious defect level weights weighting coefficient; E - defect level of the degree of improvement weighting coefficient; X (s, e) - the number of defects corresponding to the defect severity levels.
CN2010101765318A 2010-05-19 2010-05-19 System and method for outputting maturity of communication product CN101901298A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN2010101765318A CN101901298A (en) 2010-05-19 2010-05-19 System and method for outputting maturity of communication product

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN2010101765318A CN101901298A (en) 2010-05-19 2010-05-19 System and method for outputting maturity of communication product

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN101901298A true CN101901298A (en) 2010-12-01

Family

ID=43226831

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN2010101765318A CN101901298A (en) 2010-05-19 2010-05-19 System and method for outputting maturity of communication product

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN101901298A (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101288304A (en) * 2005-09-30 2008-10-15 佩斯微技术有限公司 Maturity rating enforcement via rf-tags
US20100100425A1 (en) * 2003-06-03 2010-04-22 The Boeing Company Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling a monetary measure for a good based upon technology maturity levels

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100100425A1 (en) * 2003-06-03 2010-04-22 The Boeing Company Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling a monetary measure for a good based upon technology maturity levels
CN101288304A (en) * 2005-09-30 2008-10-15 佩斯微技术有限公司 Maturity rating enforcement via rf-tags

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
孙磊等: "MUST系统在产品研发质量管理中的应用", 《中国质量》 *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Zairi Benchmarking: the best tool for measuring competitiveness
Canning et al. Infrastructure, long‐run economic growth and causality tests for cointegrated panels
Cavusgil Measuring the potential of emerging markets: An indexing approach
Kim et al. Labor mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm's patenting decision
Abeysinghe et al. Exchange rate appreciation and export competitiveness. The case of Singapore
Ho Is the ISO 9000 series for total quality management?
Prajogo et al. The relationship between multidimensional organizational culture and performance
US20150242778A1 (en) Vendor Management System
US9342783B1 (en) Systems and methods for data verification
JP5271539B2 (en) System and method for displaying market data including latest transaction data
Singh et al. Relationship between TQM and innovation: an empirical study
US20040167793A1 (en) Network monitoring method for information system, operational risk evaluation method, service business performing method, and insurance business managing method
US20120066166A1 (en) Predictive Analytics for Semi-Structured Case Oriented Processes
Antony Six Sigma in the UK service organisations: results from a pilot survey
Sanchez-Rodrigues et al. Evaluating the causes of uncertainty in logistics operations
Roh et al. Implementation of a responsive supply chain strategy in global complexity: The case of manufacturing firms
US8645921B2 (en) System and method to determine defect risks in software solutions
US9906482B2 (en) Predictive electronic message management systems and controllers
Norrman et al. Ericsson's proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident
Zobel ISO 14001 certification in manufacturing firms: a tool for those in need or an indication of greenness?
Govindan et al. Evaluation of green manufacturing practices using a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with PROMETHEE
Hooper et al. Costing customer value: an approach for the agile enterprise
US8990778B1 (en) Shadow test replay service
Antony et al. A conceptual framework for the effective implementation of statistical process control
Sloboda et al. Interstate spillovers of private capital and public spending

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
C02 Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001)