CA2209063C - Tree felling disc saw head with large accumulation area - Google Patents
Tree felling disc saw head with large accumulation area Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2209063C CA2209063C CA002209063A CA2209063A CA2209063C CA 2209063 C CA2209063 C CA 2209063C CA 002209063 A CA002209063 A CA 002209063A CA 2209063 A CA2209063 A CA 2209063A CA 2209063 C CA2209063 C CA 2209063C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- saw
- recited
- accumulation area
- head
- tree felling
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01G—HORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING
- A01G23/00—Forestry
- A01G23/02—Transplanting, uprooting, felling or delimbing trees
- A01G23/08—Felling trees
- A01G23/081—Feller-bunchers, i.e. with bunching by felling head
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
- Ecology (AREA)
- Forests & Forestry (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Supports For Plants (AREA)
- Harvester Elements (AREA)
Abstract
The felling and accumulating head has a large accumulation area for trees, obtained by elevating the accumulation area to extend outwardly and rearwardly over the teeth of the saw. Trees are swept from the front severance area, up a small ramp into the accumulation area, by a taker arm, and are retained there by a tucker arm. The taker and tucker arms pivot preferably on the same axis, on the opposite side of the head from the accumulation area, and sweep over the saw motor, to sweep trees a substantial distance rearwardly, i.e. at least beyond an imaginary lateral line through the saw axis. The butt plate is recessed beneath the top of the saw kerf, which permits the head to be angled forward slightly for continuous advancement from one tree to the next.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to disc saw heads for tree felling.
In laid-open Canadian patent application no. 2,143,155, the present inventor explained the desirability of being able to store full severance size trees, i.e.
trees of the maximum size severable by the severance means, in a position totally clear of the severance area at the front of the head. In that application, trees were stored in an accumulation area to one side and to the rear of the center line of a shear, and were swept from the severance area to the accumulation area by taker and tucker arms which pivoted from the opposite side of the center line.
In the application, it was contemplated that severance means other than a shear could be used. However, in order to make optimum use of some of the principles of the prior invention, it has been realized further innovations were desirable.
Examining the geometry and relative dimensions of a disc saw and its maximum tree diameter cutting capacity reveals some inescapable design restrictions.
15 If the maximum diameter tree to be cut (without restoring to multiple cuts) is say 22 inches, and if the motor or saw hub has a diameter of say 14 inches, then the diameter of the saw disc has to be at least 58 inches, i.e. 22 inches plus 14 inches plus 22 inches. Add to this a protective housing with some clearance for wood chip escape, and a head more than 5 feet wide at its base would have to be carried around, which 20 is greater than desirable, taking into account various factors including frequently limited space between adjacent trees.
Thus when designing a disc saw head where a large tree accumulation capacity is desired, it is not sufficient to simply increase the diameter of the disc beyond what is dimensionally needed to severthe tree, since this produces an excessively large 25 head. Instead, it is preferable to make the saw just big enough to get through the largest desired tree, and then try to use whatever storage space can be found.
Typically in the prior art, this has meant using the severance space and additional space on the surface of the disc.
However, the amount of additional space that others have had available 30 to them, prior to present invention, had been hindered by the essential construction and operating manner of such disc saws. In United States patent nos. 5,377,731 (Wildey) and 5,303,752 (MacLennan), it is apparently assumed that severed trees should only be supported on a butt plate (which covers the inner saw disc), and not on the rim which consists of the sides of the cutting teeth. This is so that neither tossing nor burning contact between the tree butt and the disc and tooth top surfaces occurs. MacLennan makes some extraordinary effort to make a slightly larger radius butt plate than some others have, so that more trees will fit onto it. Both patents show the top edge of the teeth only barely high enough to cut a path for the butt plate.
Conventional butt plates are sunk into the top of disc saws, and thus are confined to radii always less than the saw radius, by the radial dimension of the teeth and their rim. Thus in the above example if 3 inches was used for the rim and teeth, 0 then a maximum stored tree diameter which is 3 inches less than the severance size, i.e. only 19 inches instead of 22 inches would have to be accepted. This would not meet the inventor's desire to store a full size tree separate from the severance space.
A related problem in the prior art is that conventional butt plates, because of the height of their upper surfaces relative to the saw kerf, do not permit the saw disc to be angled slightly forwardly to facilitate continuous cutting, without the butt plate wedging down onto the saw disc, which is clearly undesirable for obvious reasons. This will be explained in greater detail below.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is thus an object of the invention to provide an improved disc saw tree felling head, with a large accumulation area or storage pocket for trees, which is not limited in size specifically by the saw disc diameter. Preferably, the accumulation area is located rearwardly and to one side of the head.
Preferably, the tree accumulation area is large enough to accept a tree of the full size severable by the saw, totally additional to the area provided for severing the tree from its stump.
In the invention, the large accumulation area is obtained by sweeping the butts of the severed trees up an inclined ramp that leads from the butt plate level in the severance area, i.e. the exposed area at the front of the saw, up to the level of a higher bottom plate of the accumulation area. The bottom plate of the tree accumulation area is just high enough for its bottom surface to extend over the saw teeth in operation.
Thus the tree accumulation area location is not restricted to the area above the saw disc, and can be optimally located and shaped to suit center of gravity preferences and taker and tucker arm geometry needs. The accumulation area preferably is far enough from the severance area that a full size tree can be totally severed and then swept away from the severance area and up the ramp to the accumulation area. Trees that aresmaller than full size are, after severance, first slid along a lower level butt plate before being swept up the ramp into storage. The ramp should not encroach on the tree severance space, so that in general, trees are not lifted until they are completely severed.
Preferably, the accumulation area extends a significant distance 10 rearwardly from the severance area on one side of the head, i.e. well beyond an imaginary lateral line through the saw axis. Taker and tucker arms are pivotallymounted on the other side of the head, configured so as to sweep trees from the severance area into the accumulation area. To maximize the distance by which theaccumulation area may extend rearwardly, the motor and hub over the center of the 15 saw disc are configured with a low profile, and the taker and tucker arms are configured to pivot over the motor and hub, thus enabling them to sweep farther rearwardly than if blocked by the motor and hub.
The configuration of the invention permits a much largertree accumulation area than has been possible in the prior art. Trees are accumulated principally in the accumulation area, and should not encroach on the severance area, although in practice larger trees in particular may project somewhat forwardly from the accumulation area, though preferably without encroaching on the severance area and without resting on the butt plate.
The invention also permits the use of a thinner butt plate than is 25 conventional, with its upper surface lower or no higher than the upper plane of the saw kerf. This permits the saw disc to be angled slightly forwardly to facilitate continuous cutting, as will be explained in greater detail below.
Further features of the invention will be described or will become apparent in the course of the following detailed description.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In order that the invention may be more clearly understood, the preferred embodiment thereof will now be described in detail by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a perspective view of the disc saw and its housing;
Fig. 2 is a cutaway perspective view of the saw and its housing, corresponding to Fig. 1;
Fig. 3 is a perspective view of the saw head mounted on a carrier;
Fig. 4 is a plan view of a typical prior art accumulation area and taker and 0 tucker arms;
Fig. 5 is a plan view of the preferred embodiment, showing the taker and tucker arms;
Fig. 6 is a plan view of the preferred embodiment, showing just the taker arm;
Fig. 7 is a cross-sectional elevation view, at 7-7 of Fig. 6;
Fig. 8 is a plan view of the preferred embodiment, showing a large tree just severed;
Fig. 9 is a cross-sectional elevation view, at 9-9 of Fig. 8;
Fig. 10 is a plan view of the preferred embodiment, showing a large tree stored in the accumulation area;
Fig. 11 is a cross-sectional elevation view, at 11-11 of Fig. 10;
Fig. 12 is a cross-sectional elevation view, showing the saw completely through a small tree, with the disc tilted at about 1.5 degrees so as to be able to clear the stump as the saw moves forward horizontally;
Fig. 13 is a cross-sectional elevation view, showing the saw being fed horizontally through a medium-sized tree;
Fig. 14 is a cross-sectional elevation view corresponding to Fig. 13, showing the saw fully through the medium-sized tree;
Fig. 15 is a cross-sectional elevation view, showing the saw almost fully through a large-sized tree; and Figs. 1 6A to 1 6D are various alternative cross-sections each showing the saw disc, a saw tooth, and the butt plate, Figs. 16A and 16B being prior art.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Figs. 1 and 2 show the lower portion of the feller head 1, which includes a disc saw 2 with teeth 3, a butt plate 4 just above the upper surface of the disc saw, an accumulation area 5 separated from the butt plate by a ramp 6, and a protective skirt 7. The disc saw is mounted beneath a spindle 8 hidden behind a protective housing 9, and is driven by a motor 10 hidden behind a protective housing 11. These components will be described in greater detail below.
As seen in Fig. 3, the head 1 is carried on a frame attached to the front of a typical carrier or logging vehicle 100. The attachment is essentially conventional, and virtually identical to that described in the above-mentioned Canadian application.
Essentially, the frame includes two vertical members 20 which each have upper and lower mounting flanges 21 for mounting to the conventional hydraulically-actuated vehicle-mounted linkage which allows the head to be raised and lowered, moved up and down, and tilted relative to the vehicle. Side to side motion and pivoting about a vertical axis are not necessary or provided in the illustrated embodiment, although full ranges of motion are provided when the head is boom mounted. Thus in general, "forward"and "rearward" in this specification are with respect to the head itself and its direction of advancement not necessarily with respect to the vehicle.
The frame includes two generally horizontal horns 21 and 22 which project forwardly to define an upper pocket above the accumulation area 5, to hold the trees in a generally vertical position, or preferably angled slightly inwardly. As in the above-mentioned Canadian patent application, taker and tucker arms 24 and 26 respectively are preferably mounted on a single pivot axis 28 on the opposite side of the vehicle and feller head center line from the accumulation area 5.
Fig. 4 shows a typical prior art arrangement, with a small accumulation area 5' and taker and tucker arms 24' and 26' on opposite sides of the center line.
Either or both of the taker and tucker arms typically are blocked by the motor 10', and thus can only rotate as far as the position shown in Fig. 4, i.e. trees can only be pushed rearwardly to a very limited degree.
By contrast, in the present invention the taker and tucker arms preferably are on the same side of the center line, namely the side opposite the accumulation area. In Figs. 6, 8 and 10, only the taker arm 24 is shown, for greater clarity. The tucker arm 26 is shown only in Figs. 3 and Fig. 5. In the invention, both the taker arm and the tucker arm can pivot over the motor, as shown in Fig. 5. This could be accomplished by having a taker arm which is quite high, but preferably is accomplished by virtue of a shorter than conventional spindle being used. This ability of the taker and 5 tucker arms to pass over the motor is a significant feature, in that it permits trees to be tucked back much farther than would be the case if the arms were blocked by the motor.
However, it should be clearly understood that in its broadest sense, the invention relates to the enlarged accumulation area which extends substantially beyond 0 the inner circumference of the saw tooth rim, which is the limit in the prior art. This concept could be employed with conventional taker and tucker arm configurations such as those of the Fig. 4 type and others, and could be employed whether or not the taker and tucker arms sweep over the motor, although not with the optimum results achieved by the preferred embodiment.
As soon as the first tree is severed, the taker arm 24 is actuated by the operator to sweep the base of the severed tree to the rear of the accumulation area 5.
The operator then positions the tucker arm 26 against the tree, to hold the tree in place in the accumulation area. The operator then retracts the taker arm and severs another tree, and then actuates the taker arm to sweep the tree to the accumulation area. The 20 sequence continues, until the accumulation area is filled, whether by a single large tree or by a number of small trees. This operation of takers and tuckers generally is well known, although pivoting the taker and tucker from the same side of the center line was new in the above-mentioned Canadian patent application. The advantages of pivoting both arms from the side opposite the accumulation area are well described in the25 Canadian patent application, and include for example the fact that both arms then present substantially similar geometries to the tree bundle or "bouquet", both at rest and in motion, to minimize post-capture jostling of the bouquet.
Being able to sweep the taker and tucker arms over the motor is significant, but that feature in itself would not be sufficient to create a large 30 accumulation area. The large accumulation area 5 in the invention is obtained by extending the area out over the teeth of the saw, as well as to the rear. This is achieved by sweeping the butts of the severed trees up an inclined ramp 6 that leads from the butt plate level in the severance area up to the level of a higher bottom plate 30 of the tree accumulation area 5. This is perhaps most clearly seen in Figs. 1 and 2.
The bottom plate of the tree accumulation accumulation area is just high enough for its bottom surface to extend over the saw teeth in operation. Thus the tree accumulation 5 area location is not restricted to the area above the saw disc, and can be optimally located and shaped to suit center of gravity preferences and taker and tucker arm geometry. The accumulation area is far enough from the severance area that a full size tree can be totally severed and then swept away from the severance area and up the ramp to the accumulation area. Trees that are smaller than full size are, after 10 severance, first slid along the butt plate 4 before being swept up the ramp into storage.
The ramp should not encroach on the tree severance space, so that in general, trees are not lifted until they are completely severed.
As can be seen from Fig. 9, the ramp 6 in the preferred embodiment is actually defined by a spacer 32 and the bottom plate 30 of the accumulation area, these 15 together being bolted (or otherwise secured) to the butt plate 4. The butt plate itself has a raised inner portion 34, by virtue of the outer portion being machined down to create a thinner than convention butt plate. Only large trees will contact the raised inner portion before being severed. Fig. 10 shows a large tree 50 in the accumulation area 5, with there still being room to sever and accommodate a second large tree to rest on 20 the raised inner portion of the butt plate, as can be seen in Fig. 11. As can be seen in Fig. 12, a small tree 50' will be severed before coming into contact with the raised inner portion of the butt plate. Figs. 13 and 14 show that a medium-sized tree can be cut with the head moving forward horizontally, with the head and the saw disc at a 1.5 degree angle relative to the horizontal, with the butt of the tree coming into contact with the butt 25 plate only at the point of severance, due to the clearance above the butt plate which the invention provides. Fig. 15 shows a large tree 50 being supported on the raised inner portion before being severed.
The raised inner portion 34 in the preferred embodiment is by virtue of the outer portion being machined down to create a thinner than conventional butt plate.
30 This thinner butt plate is a particularly advantageous feature of the invention, and is made possible by the fact that the trees are not stored on the butt plate, but rather are stored in the separate accumulation area. This means that the butt plate does not have to be designed to support the trees for storage, which means that at least the outer portion thereof can be made thinner. In conventional disc saws with butt plates, the combined thickness of the saw disc, the butt plate and the limited clearance space between them often results in the butt plate being forced down onto the saw disc if the 5 saw and its forward movement are not completely level. About the best that the prior art has been able to accomplish is positioning the top of the butt plate at the same level as the top of the kerf, i.e. in line with the top of the saw tooth or teeth, as shown in Figs.
16A and 16B. In the invention, as shown in Fig. 16C, it is possible to remove 1/4 inch from the thickness of the main body of the butt plate, i.e. from the conventional 5/8 inch down to 3/8 inch, creating a butt plate which is sunken 9/16 inch below the kerf. In Fig.
1 6D, an alternative embodiment, it is shown that even with a very strong 15/16 inch butt plate, the present invention can provide a butt plate which is still 3/4 inch at the reduced area and 3/16 inch below the kerf.
(Note that the kerf could be created by teeth which are co-planar, or, as is known in the prior art, by upper and lower edges respectively of teeth which alternately project slightly upwardly and downwardly relative to each other.) The advantage of this can be seen most clearly in Figs. 13 and 14, showing the cutting of a medium sized tree 50". As can be seen in Fig. 12, the saw disc can be angled slightly, at 1.5 degrees for example, which is sufficient to avoid 20 friction between the bottom of the saw disc and the tree stump. In the prior art, this would result in the portion of the tree above the butt plate bearing against the butt plate, and wedging down onto the saw disc. However, in the invention, as can be seen inFigs. 13 and 14, there is essentially no contact between the tree and the butt plate until the tree is severed. As can be seen in Fig. 12, a small tree 50' can be fully severed 25 without the butt plate coming into contact with the upper portion of the tree at all.
Furthermore, the 1.5 degree angle is sufficient for the "stump jumper" 55 at the back of the head to clear the stump, thus permitting the operator to move continuously forward from tree to tree without necessarily having to raise the head after each cut.
In summary, the preferred embodiment of the invention provides an 30 improved disc saw felling head by providing a large accumulation area extending rearwardly and outwardly over the saw teeth, by virtue of a ramp up from the butt plate level. The taker and tucker arm configuration, particularly in combination with the relatively low motor and spindle, make it possible for trees to be swept all the way back into the back of the accumulation area. The separate accumulation area permits athinner butt plate to be used, such that it can be recessed beneath the top of the kerf, with the advantages just described above. The recessing can be achieved even if the 5 butt plate is not thinner than in the prior art, and thus is not dependent on the presence of a separate accumulation area, although that is preferable.
The separate accumulation area reduces loading of the butt plate so that in some cases, especially those involving light duty, a thinner butt plate can be used.
In heavy tree work, a full-thickness butt plate is preferable, and will work well in 10 combination with the large accumulation area, and will have a long service life.
When a thickness of butt plate is used that provides a clearance above the butt plate relative to the saw kerf, then the head offers tilt-angle, stump-clearing, felling-on-the-go advantages. By reducing the thickness of the butt plate, theseadvantages would be available on any saw which did not try to store trees on the saw 15 rim, i.e. where the butt plate only was used for storage.
This invention relates to disc saw heads for tree felling.
In laid-open Canadian patent application no. 2,143,155, the present inventor explained the desirability of being able to store full severance size trees, i.e.
trees of the maximum size severable by the severance means, in a position totally clear of the severance area at the front of the head. In that application, trees were stored in an accumulation area to one side and to the rear of the center line of a shear, and were swept from the severance area to the accumulation area by taker and tucker arms which pivoted from the opposite side of the center line.
In the application, it was contemplated that severance means other than a shear could be used. However, in order to make optimum use of some of the principles of the prior invention, it has been realized further innovations were desirable.
Examining the geometry and relative dimensions of a disc saw and its maximum tree diameter cutting capacity reveals some inescapable design restrictions.
15 If the maximum diameter tree to be cut (without restoring to multiple cuts) is say 22 inches, and if the motor or saw hub has a diameter of say 14 inches, then the diameter of the saw disc has to be at least 58 inches, i.e. 22 inches plus 14 inches plus 22 inches. Add to this a protective housing with some clearance for wood chip escape, and a head more than 5 feet wide at its base would have to be carried around, which 20 is greater than desirable, taking into account various factors including frequently limited space between adjacent trees.
Thus when designing a disc saw head where a large tree accumulation capacity is desired, it is not sufficient to simply increase the diameter of the disc beyond what is dimensionally needed to severthe tree, since this produces an excessively large 25 head. Instead, it is preferable to make the saw just big enough to get through the largest desired tree, and then try to use whatever storage space can be found.
Typically in the prior art, this has meant using the severance space and additional space on the surface of the disc.
However, the amount of additional space that others have had available 30 to them, prior to present invention, had been hindered by the essential construction and operating manner of such disc saws. In United States patent nos. 5,377,731 (Wildey) and 5,303,752 (MacLennan), it is apparently assumed that severed trees should only be supported on a butt plate (which covers the inner saw disc), and not on the rim which consists of the sides of the cutting teeth. This is so that neither tossing nor burning contact between the tree butt and the disc and tooth top surfaces occurs. MacLennan makes some extraordinary effort to make a slightly larger radius butt plate than some others have, so that more trees will fit onto it. Both patents show the top edge of the teeth only barely high enough to cut a path for the butt plate.
Conventional butt plates are sunk into the top of disc saws, and thus are confined to radii always less than the saw radius, by the radial dimension of the teeth and their rim. Thus in the above example if 3 inches was used for the rim and teeth, 0 then a maximum stored tree diameter which is 3 inches less than the severance size, i.e. only 19 inches instead of 22 inches would have to be accepted. This would not meet the inventor's desire to store a full size tree separate from the severance space.
A related problem in the prior art is that conventional butt plates, because of the height of their upper surfaces relative to the saw kerf, do not permit the saw disc to be angled slightly forwardly to facilitate continuous cutting, without the butt plate wedging down onto the saw disc, which is clearly undesirable for obvious reasons. This will be explained in greater detail below.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is thus an object of the invention to provide an improved disc saw tree felling head, with a large accumulation area or storage pocket for trees, which is not limited in size specifically by the saw disc diameter. Preferably, the accumulation area is located rearwardly and to one side of the head.
Preferably, the tree accumulation area is large enough to accept a tree of the full size severable by the saw, totally additional to the area provided for severing the tree from its stump.
In the invention, the large accumulation area is obtained by sweeping the butts of the severed trees up an inclined ramp that leads from the butt plate level in the severance area, i.e. the exposed area at the front of the saw, up to the level of a higher bottom plate of the accumulation area. The bottom plate of the tree accumulation area is just high enough for its bottom surface to extend over the saw teeth in operation.
Thus the tree accumulation area location is not restricted to the area above the saw disc, and can be optimally located and shaped to suit center of gravity preferences and taker and tucker arm geometry needs. The accumulation area preferably is far enough from the severance area that a full size tree can be totally severed and then swept away from the severance area and up the ramp to the accumulation area. Trees that aresmaller than full size are, after severance, first slid along a lower level butt plate before being swept up the ramp into storage. The ramp should not encroach on the tree severance space, so that in general, trees are not lifted until they are completely severed.
Preferably, the accumulation area extends a significant distance 10 rearwardly from the severance area on one side of the head, i.e. well beyond an imaginary lateral line through the saw axis. Taker and tucker arms are pivotallymounted on the other side of the head, configured so as to sweep trees from the severance area into the accumulation area. To maximize the distance by which theaccumulation area may extend rearwardly, the motor and hub over the center of the 15 saw disc are configured with a low profile, and the taker and tucker arms are configured to pivot over the motor and hub, thus enabling them to sweep farther rearwardly than if blocked by the motor and hub.
The configuration of the invention permits a much largertree accumulation area than has been possible in the prior art. Trees are accumulated principally in the accumulation area, and should not encroach on the severance area, although in practice larger trees in particular may project somewhat forwardly from the accumulation area, though preferably without encroaching on the severance area and without resting on the butt plate.
The invention also permits the use of a thinner butt plate than is 25 conventional, with its upper surface lower or no higher than the upper plane of the saw kerf. This permits the saw disc to be angled slightly forwardly to facilitate continuous cutting, as will be explained in greater detail below.
Further features of the invention will be described or will become apparent in the course of the following detailed description.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In order that the invention may be more clearly understood, the preferred embodiment thereof will now be described in detail by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a perspective view of the disc saw and its housing;
Fig. 2 is a cutaway perspective view of the saw and its housing, corresponding to Fig. 1;
Fig. 3 is a perspective view of the saw head mounted on a carrier;
Fig. 4 is a plan view of a typical prior art accumulation area and taker and 0 tucker arms;
Fig. 5 is a plan view of the preferred embodiment, showing the taker and tucker arms;
Fig. 6 is a plan view of the preferred embodiment, showing just the taker arm;
Fig. 7 is a cross-sectional elevation view, at 7-7 of Fig. 6;
Fig. 8 is a plan view of the preferred embodiment, showing a large tree just severed;
Fig. 9 is a cross-sectional elevation view, at 9-9 of Fig. 8;
Fig. 10 is a plan view of the preferred embodiment, showing a large tree stored in the accumulation area;
Fig. 11 is a cross-sectional elevation view, at 11-11 of Fig. 10;
Fig. 12 is a cross-sectional elevation view, showing the saw completely through a small tree, with the disc tilted at about 1.5 degrees so as to be able to clear the stump as the saw moves forward horizontally;
Fig. 13 is a cross-sectional elevation view, showing the saw being fed horizontally through a medium-sized tree;
Fig. 14 is a cross-sectional elevation view corresponding to Fig. 13, showing the saw fully through the medium-sized tree;
Fig. 15 is a cross-sectional elevation view, showing the saw almost fully through a large-sized tree; and Figs. 1 6A to 1 6D are various alternative cross-sections each showing the saw disc, a saw tooth, and the butt plate, Figs. 16A and 16B being prior art.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Figs. 1 and 2 show the lower portion of the feller head 1, which includes a disc saw 2 with teeth 3, a butt plate 4 just above the upper surface of the disc saw, an accumulation area 5 separated from the butt plate by a ramp 6, and a protective skirt 7. The disc saw is mounted beneath a spindle 8 hidden behind a protective housing 9, and is driven by a motor 10 hidden behind a protective housing 11. These components will be described in greater detail below.
As seen in Fig. 3, the head 1 is carried on a frame attached to the front of a typical carrier or logging vehicle 100. The attachment is essentially conventional, and virtually identical to that described in the above-mentioned Canadian application.
Essentially, the frame includes two vertical members 20 which each have upper and lower mounting flanges 21 for mounting to the conventional hydraulically-actuated vehicle-mounted linkage which allows the head to be raised and lowered, moved up and down, and tilted relative to the vehicle. Side to side motion and pivoting about a vertical axis are not necessary or provided in the illustrated embodiment, although full ranges of motion are provided when the head is boom mounted. Thus in general, "forward"and "rearward" in this specification are with respect to the head itself and its direction of advancement not necessarily with respect to the vehicle.
The frame includes two generally horizontal horns 21 and 22 which project forwardly to define an upper pocket above the accumulation area 5, to hold the trees in a generally vertical position, or preferably angled slightly inwardly. As in the above-mentioned Canadian patent application, taker and tucker arms 24 and 26 respectively are preferably mounted on a single pivot axis 28 on the opposite side of the vehicle and feller head center line from the accumulation area 5.
Fig. 4 shows a typical prior art arrangement, with a small accumulation area 5' and taker and tucker arms 24' and 26' on opposite sides of the center line.
Either or both of the taker and tucker arms typically are blocked by the motor 10', and thus can only rotate as far as the position shown in Fig. 4, i.e. trees can only be pushed rearwardly to a very limited degree.
By contrast, in the present invention the taker and tucker arms preferably are on the same side of the center line, namely the side opposite the accumulation area. In Figs. 6, 8 and 10, only the taker arm 24 is shown, for greater clarity. The tucker arm 26 is shown only in Figs. 3 and Fig. 5. In the invention, both the taker arm and the tucker arm can pivot over the motor, as shown in Fig. 5. This could be accomplished by having a taker arm which is quite high, but preferably is accomplished by virtue of a shorter than conventional spindle being used. This ability of the taker and 5 tucker arms to pass over the motor is a significant feature, in that it permits trees to be tucked back much farther than would be the case if the arms were blocked by the motor.
However, it should be clearly understood that in its broadest sense, the invention relates to the enlarged accumulation area which extends substantially beyond 0 the inner circumference of the saw tooth rim, which is the limit in the prior art. This concept could be employed with conventional taker and tucker arm configurations such as those of the Fig. 4 type and others, and could be employed whether or not the taker and tucker arms sweep over the motor, although not with the optimum results achieved by the preferred embodiment.
As soon as the first tree is severed, the taker arm 24 is actuated by the operator to sweep the base of the severed tree to the rear of the accumulation area 5.
The operator then positions the tucker arm 26 against the tree, to hold the tree in place in the accumulation area. The operator then retracts the taker arm and severs another tree, and then actuates the taker arm to sweep the tree to the accumulation area. The 20 sequence continues, until the accumulation area is filled, whether by a single large tree or by a number of small trees. This operation of takers and tuckers generally is well known, although pivoting the taker and tucker from the same side of the center line was new in the above-mentioned Canadian patent application. The advantages of pivoting both arms from the side opposite the accumulation area are well described in the25 Canadian patent application, and include for example the fact that both arms then present substantially similar geometries to the tree bundle or "bouquet", both at rest and in motion, to minimize post-capture jostling of the bouquet.
Being able to sweep the taker and tucker arms over the motor is significant, but that feature in itself would not be sufficient to create a large 30 accumulation area. The large accumulation area 5 in the invention is obtained by extending the area out over the teeth of the saw, as well as to the rear. This is achieved by sweeping the butts of the severed trees up an inclined ramp 6 that leads from the butt plate level in the severance area up to the level of a higher bottom plate 30 of the tree accumulation area 5. This is perhaps most clearly seen in Figs. 1 and 2.
The bottom plate of the tree accumulation accumulation area is just high enough for its bottom surface to extend over the saw teeth in operation. Thus the tree accumulation 5 area location is not restricted to the area above the saw disc, and can be optimally located and shaped to suit center of gravity preferences and taker and tucker arm geometry. The accumulation area is far enough from the severance area that a full size tree can be totally severed and then swept away from the severance area and up the ramp to the accumulation area. Trees that are smaller than full size are, after 10 severance, first slid along the butt plate 4 before being swept up the ramp into storage.
The ramp should not encroach on the tree severance space, so that in general, trees are not lifted until they are completely severed.
As can be seen from Fig. 9, the ramp 6 in the preferred embodiment is actually defined by a spacer 32 and the bottom plate 30 of the accumulation area, these 15 together being bolted (or otherwise secured) to the butt plate 4. The butt plate itself has a raised inner portion 34, by virtue of the outer portion being machined down to create a thinner than convention butt plate. Only large trees will contact the raised inner portion before being severed. Fig. 10 shows a large tree 50 in the accumulation area 5, with there still being room to sever and accommodate a second large tree to rest on 20 the raised inner portion of the butt plate, as can be seen in Fig. 11. As can be seen in Fig. 12, a small tree 50' will be severed before coming into contact with the raised inner portion of the butt plate. Figs. 13 and 14 show that a medium-sized tree can be cut with the head moving forward horizontally, with the head and the saw disc at a 1.5 degree angle relative to the horizontal, with the butt of the tree coming into contact with the butt 25 plate only at the point of severance, due to the clearance above the butt plate which the invention provides. Fig. 15 shows a large tree 50 being supported on the raised inner portion before being severed.
The raised inner portion 34 in the preferred embodiment is by virtue of the outer portion being machined down to create a thinner than conventional butt plate.
30 This thinner butt plate is a particularly advantageous feature of the invention, and is made possible by the fact that the trees are not stored on the butt plate, but rather are stored in the separate accumulation area. This means that the butt plate does not have to be designed to support the trees for storage, which means that at least the outer portion thereof can be made thinner. In conventional disc saws with butt plates, the combined thickness of the saw disc, the butt plate and the limited clearance space between them often results in the butt plate being forced down onto the saw disc if the 5 saw and its forward movement are not completely level. About the best that the prior art has been able to accomplish is positioning the top of the butt plate at the same level as the top of the kerf, i.e. in line with the top of the saw tooth or teeth, as shown in Figs.
16A and 16B. In the invention, as shown in Fig. 16C, it is possible to remove 1/4 inch from the thickness of the main body of the butt plate, i.e. from the conventional 5/8 inch down to 3/8 inch, creating a butt plate which is sunken 9/16 inch below the kerf. In Fig.
1 6D, an alternative embodiment, it is shown that even with a very strong 15/16 inch butt plate, the present invention can provide a butt plate which is still 3/4 inch at the reduced area and 3/16 inch below the kerf.
(Note that the kerf could be created by teeth which are co-planar, or, as is known in the prior art, by upper and lower edges respectively of teeth which alternately project slightly upwardly and downwardly relative to each other.) The advantage of this can be seen most clearly in Figs. 13 and 14, showing the cutting of a medium sized tree 50". As can be seen in Fig. 12, the saw disc can be angled slightly, at 1.5 degrees for example, which is sufficient to avoid 20 friction between the bottom of the saw disc and the tree stump. In the prior art, this would result in the portion of the tree above the butt plate bearing against the butt plate, and wedging down onto the saw disc. However, in the invention, as can be seen inFigs. 13 and 14, there is essentially no contact between the tree and the butt plate until the tree is severed. As can be seen in Fig. 12, a small tree 50' can be fully severed 25 without the butt plate coming into contact with the upper portion of the tree at all.
Furthermore, the 1.5 degree angle is sufficient for the "stump jumper" 55 at the back of the head to clear the stump, thus permitting the operator to move continuously forward from tree to tree without necessarily having to raise the head after each cut.
In summary, the preferred embodiment of the invention provides an 30 improved disc saw felling head by providing a large accumulation area extending rearwardly and outwardly over the saw teeth, by virtue of a ramp up from the butt plate level. The taker and tucker arm configuration, particularly in combination with the relatively low motor and spindle, make it possible for trees to be swept all the way back into the back of the accumulation area. The separate accumulation area permits athinner butt plate to be used, such that it can be recessed beneath the top of the kerf, with the advantages just described above. The recessing can be achieved even if the 5 butt plate is not thinner than in the prior art, and thus is not dependent on the presence of a separate accumulation area, although that is preferable.
The separate accumulation area reduces loading of the butt plate so that in some cases, especially those involving light duty, a thinner butt plate can be used.
In heavy tree work, a full-thickness butt plate is preferable, and will work well in 10 combination with the large accumulation area, and will have a long service life.
When a thickness of butt plate is used that provides a clearance above the butt plate relative to the saw kerf, then the head offers tilt-angle, stump-clearing, felling-on-the-go advantages. By reducing the thickness of the butt plate, theseadvantages would be available on any saw which did not try to store trees on the saw 15 rim, i.e. where the butt plate only was used for storage.
Claims (36)
1. A tree felling and accumulating head comprising:
a support frame securable to a logging vehicle;
a circular saw rotatably mounted on said support frame for rotation about a saw axis which is generally vertical in normal operation, said saw having an exposed front portion;
a butt plate overlying said saw adjacent said exposed front portion, providing a severance area radially inward from the circumference of said saw and said exposed front portion;
an accumulation area for accumulating severed trees, at a higher elevation than said butt plate and separate from said severance area, connected to said butt plate by a ramp; and a plurality of arms pivotally mounted on said support frame to sweep severed trees from said butt plate, up said ramp, and into said accumulation area.
a support frame securable to a logging vehicle;
a circular saw rotatably mounted on said support frame for rotation about a saw axis which is generally vertical in normal operation, said saw having an exposed front portion;
a butt plate overlying said saw adjacent said exposed front portion, providing a severance area radially inward from the circumference of said saw and said exposed front portion;
an accumulation area for accumulating severed trees, at a higher elevation than said butt plate and separate from said severance area, connected to said butt plate by a ramp; and a plurality of arms pivotally mounted on said support frame to sweep severed trees from said butt plate, up said ramp, and into said accumulation area.
2. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 1, wherein said saw comprises a saw disc having a rim around the circumference thereof and a number of teeth around the circumference of said rim, and wherein said accumulation area is sufficiently elevated to extend, and does extend, at least above at least a portion of said rim, outwardly from said saw axis on one side thereof.
3. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 2, wherein said accumulation area is sufficiently elevated to extend, and does extend, at least above said teeth, outwardly from said saw axis on one side thereof.
4. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 3, wherein said accumulation area is sufficiently elevated to extend, and does extend, beyond said teeth, outwardly from said saw axis on one side thereof.
5. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 1, where said accumulation area extends a substantial distance rearwardly from said severance area, namely at least beyond a lateral line through said saw axis.
6. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 4, where said accumulation area extends a substantial distance rearwardly from said severance area, namely at least beyond a lateral line through said saw axis.
7. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 1, wherein said plurality of arms comprise at least one taker arm and at least one tucker arm.
8. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 7, wherein said taker and tucker arms are pivotally mounted on the opposite side of a fore-and-aft centerline of the head from the side occupied by said accumulation area.
9. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 8, where said arms are pivotally mounted on substantially the same arm axis.
10. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 6, wherein said plurality of arms comprise at least one taker arm and at least one tucker arm.
11. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 10, wherein said taker and tucker arms are pivotally mounted on the opposite side of a fore-and-aft centerline of the head from the side occupied by said accumulation area.
12. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 11, where said arms are pivotally mounted on substantially the same arm axis.
13. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 1, wherein said arms are pivotable such that at least portions thereof swing over said saw axis to sweep trees into said accumulation area.
14. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 12, further comprising a motor mounted on said frame, connected to drive said saw, wherein said motor is above said saw disc, and wherein said motor is low enough and said arms are high enough to permit such pivoting over said saw axis.
15. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 7, wherein said arms are pivotable such that at least portions thereof swing over said saw axis to sweep trees into said accumulation area.
16. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 15, further comprising a motor mounted on said frame, connected to drive said saw, wherein said motor is above said saw disc, and wherein said motor is low enough and said arms are high enough to permit such pivoting over said saw axis.
17. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 10, wherein said arms are pivotable such that at least portions thereof swing over said saw axis to sweep trees into said accumulation area.
18. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 17, further comprising a motor mounted on said frame, connected to drive said saw, wherein said motor is above said saw disc, and wherein said motor is low enough and said arms are high enough to permit such pivoting over said saw axis.
19. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 1, where at least an outer portion constituting a substantial overall portion of said butt plate has its upper surface below the upper plane of said saw kerf.
20. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 19, where said butt plate has a radially inner portion which is thicker than outer portions thereof and which has its upper surface above the upper surface of said outer portions.
21. A tree felling and accumulating head comprising:
a support frame securable to a logging vehicle;
a circular saw rotatably mounted on said support frame for rotation about a saw axis which is generally vertical in normal operation, said saw having an exposed front portion;
a butt plate overlying said saw adjacent said exposed front portion, providing a severance area radially inward from the circumference of said saw and said exposed front portion;
an accumulation area for accumulating severed trees, separate from said severance area; and a plurality of arms pivotally mounted on said support frame to sweep severed trees from said butt plate and into said accumulation area;
wherein said arms are pivotable such that at least portions thereof swing over said saw axis to sweep trees into said accumulation area.
a support frame securable to a logging vehicle;
a circular saw rotatably mounted on said support frame for rotation about a saw axis which is generally vertical in normal operation, said saw having an exposed front portion;
a butt plate overlying said saw adjacent said exposed front portion, providing a severance area radially inward from the circumference of said saw and said exposed front portion;
an accumulation area for accumulating severed trees, separate from said severance area; and a plurality of arms pivotally mounted on said support frame to sweep severed trees from said butt plate and into said accumulation area;
wherein said arms are pivotable such that at least portions thereof swing over said saw axis to sweep trees into said accumulation area.
22. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 21, further comprising a motor mounted on said frame, connected to drive said saw, wherein said motor is above said saw disc, and wherein said motor is low enough and said arms are high enough to permit said pivoting of said arms over said saw axis.
23. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 21, wherein said saw comprises a saw disc having a rim around the circumference thereof and a number of teeth around the circumference of said rim, and wherein said accumulation area is sufficiently elevated to extend, and does extend, at least above at least a portion of said rim, outwardly from said saw axis on one side thereof.
24. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 23, wherein said accumulation area is sufficiently elevated to extend, and does extend, at least above said teeth, outwardly from said saw axis on one side thereof.
25. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 24, wherein said accumulation area is sufficiently elevated to extend, and does extend, beyond said teeth, outwardly from said saw axis on one side thereof.
26. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 21, where said accumulation area extends a substantial distance rearwardly from said severance area, namely at least beyond a lateral line through said saw axis.
27. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 25, where said accumulation area extends a substantial distance rearwardly from said severance area, namely at least beyond a lateral line through said saw axis.
28. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 21, wherein said plurality of arms comprise at least one taker arm and at least one tucker arm.
29. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 28, wherein said taker and tucker arms are pivotally mounted on the opposite side of a fore-and-aft centerline of the head from the side occupied by said accumulation area.
30. A tree felling and accumulating head as recited in claim 29, where said arms are pivotally mounted on substantially the same arm axis.
31. A method of severing a tree with a tree felling and accumulating head, comprising the steps of:
advancing the head to a tree;
severing the tree with a circular saw mounted on the head to rotate about a saw axis, such that the tree then rests in a severance area on a butt plate above said circular saw; and using arms to then sweep said tree from said butt plate up a ramp into a separate elevated accumulation area.
advancing the head to a tree;
severing the tree with a circular saw mounted on the head to rotate about a saw axis, such that the tree then rests in a severance area on a butt plate above said circular saw; and using arms to then sweep said tree from said butt plate up a ramp into a separate elevated accumulation area.
32. The method of claim 31, wherein said accumulation area is elevated above said butt plate sufficiently high to extend over, and does extend over, at least a portion of an outer rim of said saw, and is separated from said butt plate by a ramp.
33. The method of claim 32, wherein said accumulation area is sufficiently elevated to extend, and does extend, at least above said teeth, outwardly from said saw axis on one side thereof.
34. The method of claim 33, wherein said accumulation area is sufficiently elevated to extend, and does extend, beyond said teeth, outwardly from said saw axis on one side thereof.
35. The method of claim 31, where said accumulation area extends a substantial distance rearwardly from said severance area, namely at least beyond a lateral line through said saw axis.
36. The method of claim 31, wherein at least portions of said arms sweep over said saw axis.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002209063A CA2209063C (en) | 1997-06-27 | 1997-06-27 | Tree felling disc saw head with large accumulation area |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002209063A CA2209063C (en) | 1997-06-27 | 1997-06-27 | Tree felling disc saw head with large accumulation area |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2209063A1 CA2209063A1 (en) | 1998-12-27 |
| CA2209063C true CA2209063C (en) | 2001-10-09 |
Family
ID=4160967
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002209063A Expired - Lifetime CA2209063C (en) | 1997-06-27 | 1997-06-27 | Tree felling disc saw head with large accumulation area |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA2209063C (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA2894361C (en) | 2014-06-17 | 2021-06-22 | Yvan Lamontagne | Forestry device with articulated accumulating arm |
-
1997
- 1997-06-27 CA CA002209063A patent/CA2209063C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA2209063A1 (en) | 1998-12-27 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5931210A (en) | Tree felling disc saw head with large tree accumulation area | |
| US5794674A (en) | Tree felling disc saw held with large accumulation area | |
| AU2014205361B2 (en) | Stump cutter disc with recessed tooth pockets | |
| JPH0345761Y2 (en) | ||
| US4374465A (en) | Attachment for rotary lawn mower | |
| CA2119195C (en) | Narrow kerf saw blade disc for tree felling head | |
| CA2186798A1 (en) | Tilting feller head | |
| US4013106A (en) | Flywheel tree feller and buncher | |
| CA2209063C (en) | Tree felling disc saw head with large accumulation area | |
| CA2430675C (en) | Tree harvesting apparatus | |
| CA2252235C (en) | Tree felling disc saw head with large tree accumulation area | |
| CA2312685C (en) | Tree felling disc saw head with large tree accumulation area | |
| US4653555A (en) | Feller-forwarder | |
| CA1131548A (en) | Feller director | |
| US6901978B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for cutting trees | |
| US5794673A (en) | Stump grinder | |
| CA2445469A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for severing a tree and reducing the tree stump | |
| US4921024A (en) | Method and apparatus to fell a tree | |
| US4445552A (en) | Saw blade construction useful in the continuous harvesting of trees | |
| US6382274B1 (en) | Dual post harvesting head | |
| CA2466384C (en) | Butt plate for feller buncher | |
| CA2104004C (en) | Arrangement in tree-processing assembly | |
| CA1214976A (en) | Tree felling apparatus | |
| US4127154A (en) | Tree harvesting apparatus | |
| US4848425A (en) | Felling head with swinging cutter bar |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20170627 |
|
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20170627 |