CA1304913C - Process for selectively removing hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream at high pressure - Google Patents

Process for selectively removing hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream at high pressure

Info

Publication number
CA1304913C
CA1304913C CA000582943A CA582943A CA1304913C CA 1304913 C CA1304913 C CA 1304913C CA 000582943 A CA000582943 A CA 000582943A CA 582943 A CA582943 A CA 582943A CA 1304913 C CA1304913 C CA 1304913C
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
gas stream
hydrogen sulfide
solution
gas
carbon dioxide
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
CA000582943A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Timothy A. Jones
Earl S. Snavely, Jr.
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mobil Oil AS
Original Assignee
Mobil Oil AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mobil Oil AS filed Critical Mobil Oil AS
Priority to CA000582943A priority Critical patent/CA1304913C/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1304913C publication Critical patent/CA1304913C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P20/00Technologies relating to chemical industry
    • Y02P20/151Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions, e.g. CO2

Landscapes

  • Gas Separation By Absorption (AREA)

Abstract

PROCESS FOR SELECTIVELY REMOVING HYDROGEN SULFIDE
FROM A GAS STREAM AT HIGH PRESSURE

ABSTRACT

Hydrogen sulfide can be removed selectively from a gas stream also containing carbon dioxide at high pressure, such as those found at natural gas production wellheads, by contacting the gas stream with an alkaline liquid for a time period of less than about 80 milliseconds.

Description

13049~3 PROCESS FOR SELECTIVELY R~OVING HYDROOE N SULFIDE
FROM ~ GAS STR ~ I AT HIG~ PRESSURE

The present invention is directed tO the selective removal of hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream. In particular, the present s invention is directed to the selective removal of hydrogen sulfide from a high pressure gas stream which also contains carbon dioxide by using a metal chelate solution. Through operation at high pressures, the present invention may be used in situations where low pressure operation would be costly and time-consuming, such as in the removal of hydrogen sulfide from the gas stream of a natural gas production well.
The present invention provides a process for the removal of hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream containing hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide, which process co~prises contactin~ the gas stream with a stoichiometric excess of polyvalent retal chelate solution over the hydrogen sulfide, the solution having a p~ of about 8.0 to 9 2 for a time less than 0.08 sec. to absorb hydro~en sulfide and not carbon dioxide, by flowing the gas stream and the solution past from two to six mixing elements in a static mixer, the gas stream, which can be from the well head of a natural gas production well, being maintained at a pressure of 5340-6170 kPa (760-880 psig) during the contacting period. The polyvalent metal-chelate solution is preferably iron- HEDTA (N- hydroxyethylethylenediaminetriacetic acid).
- 25 Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of the equipment used in the experimental work described below, and Figs. 2-4 are graphical representations of the data obtained in the experimental work described below.
As noted above, the present process is directed to the selective removal of hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream at hi~h ~, "j 1~0~913 pressure. The following apparatus and procedure were used in conducting the high pressure removal of hydrogen sulfide with an alkaline absorbing solution. Referrin~ to Fig. 1, wellhead gas was contacted with absorbin~ solution in a static mixer and quickly separated in a gas/liquid separator. The gas/liquid separator was operated at the wellhead pressure, while the gas flow rate was varied throu~h the use of valve Vl. An orifice flange was set up to measure the gas flow rate downstream of valve Vl. The pressure gauge on the gas/liquid separator indicated wellhead pressure when valve Vl was shut and flowing pressure during testing. Valve V2 was opened slightly to allow a slo~ flow to the ~as chromatograph and the hydrogen sulfide tube samplers.
Liquid was pumped to the static mixer by a variable speed Zenith ~ear pump. A two-liter cell was used for the liquid reservoir, and wellhead pressure pressurized the liquid reservoir which fed the pump. The wellhead gas which pressurized the liquid reservoir first passed through a methyldiethanol amine scrubber whi h removed the acid gases from the gas. Wellhead temperature was monitored by a thermocouple, in-line with a pyrometer.
Three solutions were tested. The first solution was 50~ by wei~ht methyldiethanol amine. The amine was purchased from Pfaltz and Pauer, Inc. The remaining two solutions were dilutions of Dow Chemical's'~ersenor'S~ iron chelate solution, and iron-HEDTA chelate solution. The concentrations of the solutions were 0.32 molar and 0.11 molar, and the pH of each was adiusted to 9.2 with ammonium carbonate solution.
The gas tested had a composition of 95.3 mole percent methane, l.S mole percent ethane, 0.3 mole percent propane, 0.4 mole percent nitrogen, 1.8 mole percent carbon dioxide, 0.1 mole percent hydrogen sulfide and 0.6 mole percent other hydrocarbons. The gas was tested at pressures from 5340 to 6170 kPa (760 to 880 psig).
Four different sizes of static mixers were used during the test:
12.7 mm (1/2") diameter by 152.4 mm (6") long; 9.5 mm (3/8") *Trade mark 7, ~30~913 F-2765 --3~~

diameter by 114.3 mm (4-1/2") long; 6.4 mm (1/4") diameter by 63.5 mm (2-1/2") lon~; and 6.4 mm (1/4") diameter by 127 m~ (5") long.
In the first test, the 50~ by wei~ht amine solution was used with the 12.7 mm (1/2") static mixer. The ~as flow rate was set at 8~D00 standard liter per hour (3,0~0 standard cubic feet per hour), which resulted in a gas- liquid contact time in the static mixer of 100 milliseconds. This was the maxirum flow rate that could be run with this equipment because of pressure drop limitations in the equipment. Five liquid flow rates were run, and the results are shcwn in Fi~. 2. This fi~ure shows the percent of hydro~en sulfide removed as a function of excess mo1ar amine pumped. Approximately 9~ of the carbon dioxide also was removed with the hydrogen sulfide. This was not unexpected, because of the relatively lon~ contact time between the liquid and the gas. About 70~ of the hydro~en sulfide was removed with a pumped amine stoichiometric excess of 300%.
To reduce the ~as-liquid contact time, the 9.5 mm (3/8') static mixer was used. With a ~as flow rate of 59400 standard liter/hour (2,100 scfh), a contact time in the static ~ixer of 17 milliseconds was maintained for the second test. As can be seen in Fig. 2, at the shorter contact time, the hydrogen sulfide still was removed, but not as efficiently as at the lon~er contact time.
Carbon dioxide was also removed (about 8) which was not expected.
These results illustrate th~t both the amine/hydro~en sulfide and - 2s amine/carbon dioxide reactions are kinetically limited. Other work has shown that carbon dioxide removal is diffusion limited, and can be controlled by limiting the gas-liquid contact time to under 80 milliseconds.
A concentrated iron chelate solution also was run to determine if selective hydro~en sulfide absorption could be achieved at the hi~her pressures. ~ecause of limited pumpin~ rates, less gas was processed in this test. The 6.4 mm x 63.5 mm (1/4" x 2-1/2") static mixer was used to obtain a short ~as-liquid contact time of ~3 D

130~9~3 F-2765 ~~4~~

17 milliseconds. Fig. 3 shows that in contactin~ the gas with a 12-fold stoichiometric excess of iron, 89% of the hydrogen sulfide was removed with no carbon dioxide absorption. For either iron chelate or amine solutions, a stoichiometric excess over the hydro~en sulfide is necessary, since the ~ixin~ does not provide for a stoichiometric reaction.
The 6.4 mm x 127 mm (1/4" x 5") static mixer then was tested and operated at the same gas rate. This produced a gas-liquid contact time of 30 milliseconds in the static mixer, doubling not only the contact time, but also the number of mixin~
elements in the static mixer. Fig. 3 shows that a slight increase in hydrogen sulfide absorption was achieved with no carbon dioxide absorption. This shows that the six mixin~ elements in the 6.4 mm x 63.5 mm (1/4" x 2-1/2") static mixer were sufficient to obtain the needed liquid dispersion to assure kinetic control of the reaction.
In the next test, the iron chelate solution was diluted to yield a final iron chelate concentration of 0.11 ~, as opposed to the 0.32 ~ solution tested previously. Again, no carbon dioxide was absorbed during the test. As shown in Fig. 3, to achieve 80%
hydrogen sulfide removal, a 380~ molar excess of iron chelate was needed. The data from all the tests are ~iven in the Table on the following page ~30~g~3 E
o O o o o ~ ~ o o o 1` t`
O O O O o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ _~
_~
~ ~0 d~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O U~ O

o .,.~ ~.
E ~7 ~ ~ ~ ~ o r) r') `D ~o u~
O E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u~ ul ~ ~) _ ~n ~

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o O ,_ o o o O o o O o o o ~ ~ O _I
o h 1~ h ~ ~ h L~

~; ~ O C~ O O O O O o O o o O
O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O
~1 ~O ~ O O O O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ et ~3 ~ _J 0000 X 00 00 X 00 Lr ~

~ e~ ~ ~t ~ et ~ ~t X X X X X
X X ;~ X X X X X
oo oo oo ~o ~o oo oo oo E a E E E~ E E E

u ~ x x x x x x x x x x x x x t` ~ ~` l` l`

d o' ~ c~ ~ d ~. ~-W L~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L~

~0 V
~D ~ 3 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 N 1--1 cl~ . <~ ~ ~ elP ~
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

O U~

130~g~3 a~
--v ~E

U~ ~
~ O

v O v~ ~D 1` u7 O~ O~ 00 `O a-I E ~ ~ ~ oo oo r~ o~

O
.~1 5.)~
E o u~ ~ I` o _~ o o o o o 3 ca ~ ~ _1 ~ ot~ ~ ~ u~ ~) ~ U~ `D
O E

V
v ~ e~ ~ ~ e~ et ~ e~ ~ ~ ~

~y ~ o o o o o o o o o o o In ~ o o o o o o o o o o o x x x x x x e~ e~ x x x x x ~t ~r E E E b EE b E E b ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
v ., ~ X X X X X X X X X X X
c~ X ~ ~t ~r ~ er ~ G ~ e~ ~ ~t C~
a~
rC ~
o v ~o o 8 o ~v v o vo o Ov ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _1 u~

u~ _ l~O~g~3 F-276S ~~7-~

Fig. 4 shows the same data as Fig. 3, but as a function of pumping rate. The dilute solution is not as efficient in this case. However, only a 5~ increase in hydro~en sulfide removal is seen over the dilute solution. Since concentration appears to make very little difference, the limiting factor for the concentrations tested is the total liquid surface area. The total li~uid surface area is a function of the mean drop diameter and the volume of liquid pumped. The mean drop diameter is controlled by the type and number of static mixer elements used alon~ with the velocity of the fluids and the physical properties of both the li~uid and ~as. This is described in U.S. Patent 4,499,059. Using static mixers with a gas-liquid system, a stable mean drop diameter is obtained with two to six static mixer elements. Additional elements do not reduce the mean drop diameter. Thus, with six mixing elements, the total liquid surface area can be controlled by varying the liquid flow rate, and hence at constant ~as rates and solution ~'s, the hydro~en removal efficiency can be controlled by varyin~ the liquid flow rate.
The polyvalent metal chelate solution must have a pH of at least 7, preferably 8-9, and may be a polyvalent metal chelate solution, with pff adjusted by sodiu~ or ammonium carbonate. The polyvalent metal ~ay be selected from iron, copper, manganese, lead, mercury, palladium, platinum, tungsten, nickel, chromium, cobalt, vanadium, titanium, tantalum, zirconium, molybdenum and tin, preferably iron, copper and manganese, and most preferably iron.
The chelating agent may be selected from amino acetic acids derived from ammonia or 2-hydroxyalkylamines, such as glycine, diglycine (aminodiacetic acid), nitrilo triacetic acid, 2-hydroxyalkylglycine, di-hydroxyalkylglycine and hydroxyethyl or 3~ hydroxypropyldiglycine, amino acetic acids derived from ethylene diamine, diethylenetriamine, 1,2-propylenediamine and 1,3-propylenediamine, such as EDTA, 2-hydroxy EDTA, and diethylene tria~ine pent2aceticacid, amino acetic acid derivatives of cyclic 1~0~1~13 1,2-diamines, such as 1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N, N- tetraacetic acid, and amides of polyamino acetic acids, as disclosed in U. S. Patent No. 3,580,950 to Bersworth. E~T~ and N-hydroxyethylethylenediaminetriacetic acid (HEDTA) are particularly preferred. The alkaline liquid also may be selected from aqueous solutions of inorganic salts having an alkaline reaction, such as alkali metal hydroxides, rhosphates, borates, metaborates or arsenites, solutions of or~anic bases, svch as alkanolamines, like monoethanol amine, diethanolamine, triethanolamine, N-methyldiethanolamine, alkanoldiamines, alkenylpolyamines, or solutions of salts of weak or~anic acids, such as amino carboxylic acids and aminosulfonic acids, or other alkaline liquids. Alkali metal hydroxides and alkanolamines are preferred, particularly diethanola~ine and N- methyldiethanolamine.
Thus, the present invention provides a process for the selective removal of hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream also containing carbon dioxide, at high pressure, by contactin~ the gas stream with an alkaline liquid. A limited gas-liquid contact time of less than 0.08 sec. allows selective removal of hydro~en sulfide.
Althou~h a detailed description of the present invention has been provided above, the present invention is not limited thereto. ~odifications will be apparent to those of ordinary skill which are not outside the scope of the invention, which is defined in the following claims.

Claims (3)

1. A method for selectively removing hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream containing hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide, comprising contacting the gas stream with a stoichiometric excess of a polyvalent metal chelate solution over said hydrogen sulfide said solution having a pH of about 8.0 to 9.2 for a time period less than 80 milliseconds to absorb hydrogen sulfide and not carbon dioxide, by flowing said gas stream and said solution past from two to six mixing elements in a static mixer, said gas stream being at a wellhead pressure of about 760-880 psig during said contacting period.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said polyvalent metal chelate solution is an iron-HEDTA solution.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the gas stream and the solution flow past six mixing elements.

0001A/0388h
CA000582943A 1988-11-14 1988-11-14 Process for selectively removing hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream at high pressure Expired - Lifetime CA1304913C (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA000582943A CA1304913C (en) 1988-11-14 1988-11-14 Process for selectively removing hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream at high pressure

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA000582943A CA1304913C (en) 1988-11-14 1988-11-14 Process for selectively removing hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream at high pressure

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1304913C true CA1304913C (en) 1992-07-14

Family

ID=4139087

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA000582943A Expired - Lifetime CA1304913C (en) 1988-11-14 1988-11-14 Process for selectively removing hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream at high pressure

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CA (1) CA1304913C (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014201487A1 (en) 2013-06-20 2014-12-24 Technische Universität Wien Process and apparatus for desulfurizing gas mixtures

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014201487A1 (en) 2013-06-20 2014-12-24 Technische Universität Wien Process and apparatus for desulfurizing gas mixtures

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0370145B1 (en) Process for selectively removing hydrogen sulfide from a gas stream at high pressure
Littel et al. Kinetics of carbon dioxide with tertiary amines in aqueous solution
Bosch et al. Kinetics of the reaction of CO2 with the sterically hindered amine 2-amino-2-methylpropanol at 298 K
Littel et al. Kinetics of CO2 with primary and secondary amines in aqueous solutions—I. Zwitterion deprotonation kinetics for DEA and DIPA in aqueous blends of alkanolamines
Hikita et al. Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous monoethanolamine solutions
Jou et al. Vapor-liquid equilibrium of carbon dioxide in aqueous mixtures of monoethanolamine and methyldiethanolamine
Liu et al. Absorption of carbon dioxide in aqueous ammonia
JPH0134092B2 (en)
EP0408700A1 (en) Composition and method for sweetening hydrocarbons.
Shrier et al. Carbon dioxide absorption into amine-promoted potash solutions
US4499059A (en) In-line injection of alkaline absorbant to remove H2 S
Intan Listiyana et al. CO2 desorption from activated DEA using membrane contactor with vacuum regeneration technology
Dubois et al. Comparison of Various Alkaline Solutions for H2S/CO2‐Selective Absorption Applied to Biogas Purification
Shen et al. Kinetics of carbon dioxide reaction with sterically hindered 2-piperidineethanol aqueous solutions
Davis et al. Kinetics of the reaction of carbon dioxide with secondary amines in polyethylene glycol
CA2083684A1 (en) Process and apparatus for removing acid gas from a gaseous composition
Savage et al. Chemical kinetics of carbon dioxide reactions with diethanolamine and diisopropanolamine in aqueous solutions
CN108554127B (en) Composite desulfurization auxiliary agent and application
Barth et al. Stopped‐flow determination of carbon dioxide–diethanolamine reaction mechanism: Kinetics of carbamate formation
Li et al. Solubility of mixtures of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide in water+ monoethanolamine+ 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol
Yih et al. Simultaneous absorption of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide into di‐isopropanolamine solution
Suda et al. Countercurrent absorption of CO2 in a real flue gas into aqueous alkanolamine solutions in a wetted wall column
US5693297A (en) Gas treatment method
Vaidya et al. CO2 capture by novel amine blends
La Rubia et al. Kinetic study of the absorption of carbon dioxide by aqueous triethanolamine solutions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKLA Lapsed