CA1110163A - Fracing process - Google Patents
Fracing processInfo
- Publication number
- CA1110163A CA1110163A CA328,865A CA328865A CA1110163A CA 1110163 A CA1110163 A CA 1110163A CA 328865 A CA328865 A CA 328865A CA 1110163 A CA1110163 A CA 1110163A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- proppant
- fluid
- formation
- fracing fluid
- volume
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Abstract
FRACING PROCESS
ABSTRACT
A method for hydraulically fracturing a single subterranean formation in which a fracture is first induced in the formation and then subjected to multiple hydraulic fracturing cycles to generate vertical linear fractures or to linearly extend the fracture outward from the point of introduction of the fracing fluid into a well penetrating the formation. By utilizing fracing fluid containing a high ratio of fine proppant and injected at a low rate, the linear fracturing solely within the formation can be substantially increased with very little or no radial vertical fracturing occurring outside the formation.
ABSTRACT
A method for hydraulically fracturing a single subterranean formation in which a fracture is first induced in the formation and then subjected to multiple hydraulic fracturing cycles to generate vertical linear fractures or to linearly extend the fracture outward from the point of introduction of the fracing fluid into a well penetrating the formation. By utilizing fracing fluid containing a high ratio of fine proppant and injected at a low rate, the linear fracturing solely within the formation can be substantially increased with very little or no radial vertical fracturing occurring outside the formation.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention This invention relates to hydraulic fracturing of earth formations, and more particularly to the hydraulic fracturing of hydrocarbon bearing formations, i.e., oil and gas sands, for the purpose of increasing the producing rate and total amount of recovery of the hydrocarbons from a well completed in such a formation.
1. Field of the Invention This invention relates to hydraulic fracturing of earth formations, and more particularly to the hydraulic fracturing of hydrocarbon bearing formations, i.e., oil and gas sands, for the purpose of increasing the producing rate and total amount of recovery of the hydrocarbons from a well completed in such a formation.
2. Brief Description of the Pr.ior Art Hydraulic fracturing techniques for hydrocarbon Eor-mations are well known and have been extensively used for in-creasing the recovery of oil and gas from hydrocarbon bear-ing formations. These techniques involve injecting a frac~
ing fluid down the well bore and into contact with the forma-tion to be fractured. Sufficientl~ high pressure is applied to the fracing fluid to initiate and propagate a fracture into the formation. Propping materials are generally entrained in the fracing fluid and deposited in the fracture to main-tain the fracture open during production.
The function of fracturing is to overcome the de-ficiency in permeability of the formation adjacent the well bore by creating a highly conductive path reaching out into the producing formation sand and/or rock surrounding the well bore. According to the usual practice, a fluid, such as water, oil, oil/water emulsion, gelled water or gelled oil is pumped down a well bore with sufficient pressure to open a fracture in the formation. The fracing fluid may carry a suitable propping agent, such as sand, glass beads, etc., for the purpose of holding the fracture open after the fracturing fluid has been recovered, e.g., allowing the well to flow. In the case of tight or low permeability wells, that is, wells below one millidarcy permeability, prior art methods of fracturing have produced results that are of but a temporary nature as far as increasing the rate of flow is concerned. After per-haps a short period of accelerated flow, rates of production may drop off to near previous lev~ls. Repeated stimulation with the same or similar procedure may again produce but a temporary gain.
One of the reasons for such a lack of results in a low permeability formation is that at the depths encountered most formations have a preferred vertical fracture orientation which exists because of naturally occurring planes of weakness in the formation as the fracture is formed and are propagated along these planes of weakness. It has been found that these vertical fractures are most advantageous in formations having a relatively wide pay zone and a permeability on the order of lO to 20 millidarcys.
Unfortunately, many geological oil and yas bearing ormations, including some West Texas formations, which are primarily gas formations, comprise muLtiple, vertically-spaced narrow pay zones, that is lO-to-30 foot pay zone for-mations, each separated generally by a shale layer. Further, the pay zones are formed in sandstone and have a very low per-meability, on the order of 10 to 0.1 millidarcy or less. To further complicate recovery, the pay zones contain contaminants, such as water sensitive clays and iron, which react unfavorably with acids often used in treating the formation.
Using a conventional fracing process, vertica:L frac-turing occurs as above-descxibed. In a gas well of the above-described multiple pay zone type, this results in radial verti-cal fracturing that extends between the pay zones and through the intervening shale zones. As a result, fracing fluid is lost into the shale zones with no resulting benefit in fracturing the hydrocarbon pay zones.
Additionally, only small vertically oriented radial fractures are created in the pay zones and because of the deep vertical orientation do not permit much radial penetration horizontally into the pay zone itself. A temporary increase in production produced by the vertical fractures is believed to be the result of the fracture permitting communication between the well bore in a small portion of a joint system between the matrix elements of the formation and with a small portion of the reservoir matrix. However, as soon as this low volume space has been drained, productivity drops off to that con-trolled by the low permeability reservoir matrix, and since the formation area exposed to such matrix by the short radial vertical fractures is small, productivity is low.
The present invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art by providing a method for fracturing a pro-ducing formation to produce long vertical linear fractures extend-ing outward from a borehole within the zone of interest, with a minimization of radial vertically oriented fractures occurring above and below the producing zone of interest.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention is directed to a method for forming long vertical linear fractures which extend outward from -the borehole in a producing zone with a minimization of radial vertical frac-turing penetrating into the intervening shale layers. I'he process comprises multiple fracing stages carrying a fine proppant sand of between 60 to 140 mesh size (average 100 mesh) in a high sand-to-fluld ratio mix, i.e., 4 lbs./gal. or higher.
Each carrier stage is immediately followed by a corresponding spacer stage comprising the fracing fluid without a proppant added. Immediately following the final carrier stage and corresponding spacer stage, a terminating stage carrying a medium proppant sand of a 20 to 40 mesh size is injected, followed by a fracing fluid flush of the tubing string. Addi-tionally, the fracing fluid may be made up of up to 70~ alcoholby volume in order to reduce the water volume of the fracing fluid which may adversely react with water sensitive clays within the formation. Further, up to 20% liquified CO2 (carbon dioxide) by volume may be combined with the frac water/alcohol mixture to further reduce the water volume for the above-mentioned reason and, in addition, reduce the "wet" liquid injected into the formation.
As above mentioned, most formations have a preferred vertical fracture orientation along naturally occurring planes of weakness. Therefore, it is usually anticipated that vertical fracturing will occur in the formation. However, although a "fracture" will have a generally "vertical" orientation, the plane angle of the propagating fxacture may vary greatly in the formation as the planes of formation weakness vary. A fracture may begin as a substantially vertical fracture and end as a subs-tantially horizontal fracture, or begin as a horizontal (pancake~ fracture and dip ox twist to a more vertical orienta~
tion as a further radial distance from the borehole. Accordingly, in the disclosure that follows, the term 'Ivertical'' when refer-ring to vertical fracturing, will include all other possible orientations of the :Eract~e in addition to the preferredvertical orientation.
It is a feature of the present invention to provide a method of creating long vertical llnear fractures within relatively thin hydrocarbon formations while substantially eliminating radial vertical fractures into the overlying and underlying shale or other non-producing formations.
It is another feature of the present invention to provide a fracing fluid containing a minimum water content which will adversely react with water sensitive clays entrapped in the producing formations.
It is still another eature of the present invention to provide a method of creating vertical linear fractures within a thin producing formation that are much wider than those produced by prior art methods, therefore exposing a much larger vertical area of the formation.
It is yet another ~eature o~ the present invention to provide a method of inserting several times the amount of solids into the formation for use as "propping agents" as heretofore has been injected using conventional fracing tech-niques.
These and other features and advantages of the pre-sent invention will become apparent from the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompany-~5 ing drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In order that the manner in which the above--recited advantages and features of the invention are attained can be understood in detail, and a more particular description i3 of the inventlon may be had by reference to the specific embodiment thereof when compared to an embodiment depicting the prior art, both of which are illustrated in the appended drawings, which drawings form a part of this specification.
It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawin~s illus-trate only the typical embodiment of the invention and there-fore is not to be considered limiting of its scope when the in-vention may admit to further equally effective embodiments.
In the drawings:
Fiyure 1 is a cross-sectional view illustrating a borehole penetrating an oil or gas bearing formation for in-troducing a fracing fluid into contact with the formation, and in particular shows the radial vertical fracturiny orientation of multiple pay zones and intervening non-producing formations occurring from conventional fracing techniques.
Figure 2 is a cross-sectional view of a borehole extending into a multiple pay zone hydrocarbon bearing formation and illustrates the long vertical linear fractures created khrough use o~ the present invention.
Figure 3 is a vertical cross-sectional view of a typical vertical linear fracture in the pay zone shown in Figure 2 as taken along lines 3--3 of Figure 2.
Figure 4 is a vertical cross-sectional view of a typical radial vertical fracture produced by prior art methods as taken along lines 4--4 of Eigure 1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFER~ED EMBODIMENT
.
The time for a pressure disturbance, that is, a pres-sure drop initiated by a producing well, to be propagated radially from the well bore through a low permeability earth formation, it may take the 20-year period to drain the 14.6-acre area reached by pressure wave front. Further extension will show that it will take the pressure wave 21.5 years to reach the perimeter of a 320-acre square centered on the well bore, and that the volume extending horizontally over such an area would be drainable in 430 years. The pressure wave would take 34 years in the case of a 640 acre tract (one square mile) which would be ~rainable in 680 years.
It will be apparent from the foregoing that in order to produce a low permeability field within a 20-year period, the well spacing would have to be approximately 900 feet. How ever, many states have statutes governing well densities in oil and gas fields. It can be seen that it would be impractical to economically produce a well in such a low permeability forma-tion without special producing techniques.
To speed up recovery from low permeability fields,techniques have been developed in the prior art directed to producing radial fractures in the ~ormation which act as drainage channels to permit the production fluid to drain to the well.
Generally, a high volume of fracing fluid, on the order of 5,000 or more gallons per stage, is pumped into the formation at a high input rate, in the range of 25 to 50 barrels per minute.
Additionally, various propping agen-ts have been utilized to maintain the fractures created in an open posi-tion after the fracturing pressure has been released. Forpurposes of definition within this application, reference to a "medium" size proppant shall mean a proppant having a mesh size falling within the range of 20 to 40. Furthex, reference to a "fine" size proppant shall mean a proppant having a mesh size falling within the range of 60 to 140. The above-mentioned definitions are not to be construed as limitations on the in-vention, as other proppant sizes may be equally effective in realizing the objectives of the invention. Among such proppinq agents used in the prior art is "medium" sand (20 to 40 mesh), used in preference to "fine" sand (60 to 140 mesh) in the belief that the fine sand would pack too tightly and actually cause the fracture-proppant volume to have a permeability lower than the formation. Generally, a low ratio of proppants to fracing fluid (such as 1/2 to 2 lbs. of sand per gallon of fluid) was utilized.
When used with a single, relatively thick, medium permeability pay zone, conventional fracing techniques develop-ed in the prior art have proved ade~uate. However, when the conventional fracing techni~ues are used to fracture low per-meability, relatively thin formations, such as found inseveral gas-sand areas in West Texas, the resulting ~roduction has been much less than expected, as will be hereina~ter explained.
Re~erring now to Figure 1~ conventional hydraulic racturing techni.ques utilize a well 10, having casing 12 extending through an overburden 14 into multiple gas sand pay zones 16, with the pay zones 16 being separated by non-oil or gas bearing strata, such as shale layers 18. A number of perforations 20 are conventionally formed in casing 12 extending into the pay zones 16. Further, a pump 22 connected by tubing 24 to a source o a sand and racing fluid mixtur~ 26 p~ps the fracing fluid mix into the casing 12 through tubing 28 where, as pressure builds up within casing 12, the fluid is forced out through perforations 20 i.nto the producing formations creating fractures 30. Due to the high 6i3 input rate, the pressure builds up rapidly extending the radial vertical fractures 30 in pay zones 16 through intervening non-producing formations 18. As a result, a large ~uantity of the fracing fluid and sand is deposited in fractures in zones and strata where there is no oil or gas. Additionally, the vertical extending formation of fractures 30 into upper and lower forma-tions tends ~o limit the radial length of the vertical frac-tures to an average length "X". As a result, the short radial vertical fractures within the producing formation expose only a limited area of the formation 16, resulting in production for only a relatively short time and further production must depend on the slow natural drainage through the low permeability of the formation into the fracture and then to the well bore.
According to the present invention, long vertical linear fractures extending outward from the well casing into a desired producing formation with substantially no vertically oriented fractures extending into overlying or underlying non~producing formations are obtained as will be hereinafter described. Refer-ring now to Figure 2, the same reference numbers used for Figure 1 have been used to identify similar components for simplicity.
Accordingly, well 10 is shown to include casing 12 extending through overburden 14 into multiple gas-sand pay zones 16, which are separated by intervening shale layers 18. Pump 22 is shown connected to a source of sand and fracing fluid mixture 26 by tubing 24 and pumps the proppant-laden fracing fluid into the tubing (not shown) within casing 12 through piping 28. Conven-tional techniques are utilized to perforate the casing 12 adjacent a single~pay zone 16 as shown by perforations 20.
~ Thereafter, the perforated section of the casing is isolated in order that as the fracinq fluid is injected, it only affects the single pay zone. A relatively low volume of fracing fluid (2,000 to 5,000 gallons per stage~ with a high ratio of solids ~in this case, sand), such as 4 to 10 lbs.
(or greater) of sand per gallon of fracing fluid is injected into the single pay zone 16. A low input rate (such as 9 to 15 barrels per minute) is used which results in the ability to use a 2 to 3-inch tubing for the fracing fluid injection, as opposed to a much larger casing which must be utilized in the conventional fracing method because of the high input rates.
Further, the pressure required to fracture the formation is confined to the tubing and the casing adjacent the formation, reducing the surface area on which the pressure must be main-tained.
As will be hereinafter described, multiple stages of proppant-laden fracing fluid alternated with corresponding unladen fracing fluid stages are injected causing vertically oriented fractures 50 to extend linearly outward for a length defined by "Y" with little or no radial vertical fracturing occurring outside of the treated pay zone 16. The in-creased surface area of formation 16 exposed to the longerfracture 50 substantially increases production. Further, by confining fracturing to a single formation, an increased effi-ciency o~ production is obtained from that pay zone, without drawing from other zones simultaneously. Once a lowermost formation 16 has been depleted, then the casing 12 would be plugged to seal off the already produced formation and a higher formation would be treated and produced as hereinabove described.
As previously described, prior art fracing processes utilized in such thin multiple pay zones 16 only obtained fractures 30 having a radial length "X" and a "propped" width "B" (see Figure 4) of 0.10 inches or less, often in the range of 0.0625 inches utilizing a "medium" proppant 35. Utilizing the process of the present invention, a fracture 50 having a length "Y" (as compared to "X"~ can be obtained, with a "propped"
width "A" (see Figure 3) of approximately 0.25 inches utilizing a "fine" proppant 37. As hereinabove described, the longer the linear fracture 50 can be made, the greater the producing formation 16 vertical cross-sectional area will be exposed to the fracture S0 to form a low pressure channel to the casing 12, thereby increasing productivity ~rom the pay zone. As can be seen from Figures l and 2, a certain cross-sectional area of formation 16 is exposed to fractures 30 and 50. Fracture 50 can often be at least 2-5 times the length of fracture 30, thereby increasing the total vertical cross-sectional area exposed to the fracture by at least 200-500~ with corresponding increases in productivity. In one test well in which 1,000,000 pounds of proppant (fine sand) was deposited in the formation fracture utilizing the process of this invention, logs and other test data indicated a probable linear fracture of over 2,000 feet wholly within the gas formation.
The methods of the invention can be carried out by any conventional apparatus used for previously known methods of hydraulic fracturing. Thus, suitable apparatus is shown in both Figure 1, the prior art, and Figure 2 of this appli-cation. The fracturing fluid can be injected through the well tubing, casing or other available or suitable pipe or conduit, and may be flowed back into a pit or into the fracturing fluid tank. The fluid can be injected through perforations in the casing extending through the cement and ... . , ~
directly into the formation, the injection being confined to a selected horizontal thin formation through conventional isolation techniques. Additionally, conventional proppant water mixing equipment and pumping equipment may be utilized in performlng the method.
The fracturing fluid preferably used in carrying out the method of the present invention is a 2-3% KCl (potassium chloride) water containing conventional gels to increase its viscosity, and is mixed with liquified carbon dioxide (CO2) in predetermined ratios preselected from the range of 10~ to 20 C2 by volume. The CO2 is maintained at -10 F. until combined with the KCl water in mixer 26 just prior to the ~racing fluid being pumped into well 12. During injection the CO2 remains liquified since it is under pressure, and only after the temperature reaches 85 F. at the fracing pressures in the formation does the CO2 change to gaseous form. This change to a gas has two benefits. One benefit is the additional energy (when the CO gasifies) which assists in removing frac water from the well bore. A second benefit is the reduction o~ "wet"
fluid injected into the formation which must be recovered.
Since many of the producing formations encountered in the multiple pay zone areas of West Texas include water sensitive clays, it is advantageous to reduce the amount of water injected into the formation. In addition to the conven-tional reduction of water by the above-mentioned addition of CO2, water used in the fracing fluid may be further reduced by the addition of a suitable alcohol in predetermined ratios of up to 70~ alcohol by volume of the total ~racing fluid. A
suitabIe alcohol for purposes of this application is defined as any alcohol which will reduce the surface tension of the remain-ing water to enhance pumping of the fracing fluid and, equally important, is miscible ~ith water. By way of example, 57,000 gallons of the preferred fracing fluid could be made up utiliz-ing 13,680 gallons of sand, 11,400 gallons of liquified CO2, 8,880 gallons of H2O and 23,040 gallons or methanol or iso-propyl or other suitable alcohol. Further, the use of frac-ing fluid combined with alcohol and C02 within the ratios above-described has led to the recovery of injected fluids in ranges of 80 to 95~.
The injection time depends on the volume of fracing fluid to be injected, which ls determined by how large a fracture is desired and is calculated in advance, and upon the flow rate, which depends on the pressure and flow resis-tance. Further, the total injection time will be the sum of the injection times for the various multiple stages.
The following is an example of an experimental well stimulation treatment carried out according to the invention in a Wést Texas gas field:
EX~MPLE
Formation Thickness 28' Depth: 7082' to 711Q' Materials: 3~ KCl water plus 20%
by volume Co2 and in-cluding a base fluid gel having a density of 40#/gal. gelling agent Propping Agent: Sand, average 100 mesh, 488,600 lbs. and 20/40 mesh 51,000 lbs Casing: 4-1/2" O.D.
Tubing: 2-7/8" O.D.
Perforations: 22 Pressure Average on casing 1500 lbs.
Average on tubing 5500 :Lbs.
Hydraulic Horsepower Usedo 2022 Average Rates in barrels per minute 15 Number of staqes 40 Volumes:
Pre PAD 10,000 gal.
P~D 7,000 gal.
Proppant Laden Fluid66, ooa gal.
Displacement1,000 gal.
Total Fluid 84,000 Volume Event Rate (Incremental Pressure ~psi) Description of No. (bpm) Volume) (Tubing) (Casing) Operation & Materials 1 Test Line 2 0-157000 0-5000 1500 Pump Pad
ing fluid down the well bore and into contact with the forma-tion to be fractured. Sufficientl~ high pressure is applied to the fracing fluid to initiate and propagate a fracture into the formation. Propping materials are generally entrained in the fracing fluid and deposited in the fracture to main-tain the fracture open during production.
The function of fracturing is to overcome the de-ficiency in permeability of the formation adjacent the well bore by creating a highly conductive path reaching out into the producing formation sand and/or rock surrounding the well bore. According to the usual practice, a fluid, such as water, oil, oil/water emulsion, gelled water or gelled oil is pumped down a well bore with sufficient pressure to open a fracture in the formation. The fracing fluid may carry a suitable propping agent, such as sand, glass beads, etc., for the purpose of holding the fracture open after the fracturing fluid has been recovered, e.g., allowing the well to flow. In the case of tight or low permeability wells, that is, wells below one millidarcy permeability, prior art methods of fracturing have produced results that are of but a temporary nature as far as increasing the rate of flow is concerned. After per-haps a short period of accelerated flow, rates of production may drop off to near previous lev~ls. Repeated stimulation with the same or similar procedure may again produce but a temporary gain.
One of the reasons for such a lack of results in a low permeability formation is that at the depths encountered most formations have a preferred vertical fracture orientation which exists because of naturally occurring planes of weakness in the formation as the fracture is formed and are propagated along these planes of weakness. It has been found that these vertical fractures are most advantageous in formations having a relatively wide pay zone and a permeability on the order of lO to 20 millidarcys.
Unfortunately, many geological oil and yas bearing ormations, including some West Texas formations, which are primarily gas formations, comprise muLtiple, vertically-spaced narrow pay zones, that is lO-to-30 foot pay zone for-mations, each separated generally by a shale layer. Further, the pay zones are formed in sandstone and have a very low per-meability, on the order of 10 to 0.1 millidarcy or less. To further complicate recovery, the pay zones contain contaminants, such as water sensitive clays and iron, which react unfavorably with acids often used in treating the formation.
Using a conventional fracing process, vertica:L frac-turing occurs as above-descxibed. In a gas well of the above-described multiple pay zone type, this results in radial verti-cal fracturing that extends between the pay zones and through the intervening shale zones. As a result, fracing fluid is lost into the shale zones with no resulting benefit in fracturing the hydrocarbon pay zones.
Additionally, only small vertically oriented radial fractures are created in the pay zones and because of the deep vertical orientation do not permit much radial penetration horizontally into the pay zone itself. A temporary increase in production produced by the vertical fractures is believed to be the result of the fracture permitting communication between the well bore in a small portion of a joint system between the matrix elements of the formation and with a small portion of the reservoir matrix. However, as soon as this low volume space has been drained, productivity drops off to that con-trolled by the low permeability reservoir matrix, and since the formation area exposed to such matrix by the short radial vertical fractures is small, productivity is low.
The present invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art by providing a method for fracturing a pro-ducing formation to produce long vertical linear fractures extend-ing outward from a borehole within the zone of interest, with a minimization of radial vertically oriented fractures occurring above and below the producing zone of interest.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention is directed to a method for forming long vertical linear fractures which extend outward from -the borehole in a producing zone with a minimization of radial vertical frac-turing penetrating into the intervening shale layers. I'he process comprises multiple fracing stages carrying a fine proppant sand of between 60 to 140 mesh size (average 100 mesh) in a high sand-to-fluld ratio mix, i.e., 4 lbs./gal. or higher.
Each carrier stage is immediately followed by a corresponding spacer stage comprising the fracing fluid without a proppant added. Immediately following the final carrier stage and corresponding spacer stage, a terminating stage carrying a medium proppant sand of a 20 to 40 mesh size is injected, followed by a fracing fluid flush of the tubing string. Addi-tionally, the fracing fluid may be made up of up to 70~ alcoholby volume in order to reduce the water volume of the fracing fluid which may adversely react with water sensitive clays within the formation. Further, up to 20% liquified CO2 (carbon dioxide) by volume may be combined with the frac water/alcohol mixture to further reduce the water volume for the above-mentioned reason and, in addition, reduce the "wet" liquid injected into the formation.
As above mentioned, most formations have a preferred vertical fracture orientation along naturally occurring planes of weakness. Therefore, it is usually anticipated that vertical fracturing will occur in the formation. However, although a "fracture" will have a generally "vertical" orientation, the plane angle of the propagating fxacture may vary greatly in the formation as the planes of formation weakness vary. A fracture may begin as a substantially vertical fracture and end as a subs-tantially horizontal fracture, or begin as a horizontal (pancake~ fracture and dip ox twist to a more vertical orienta~
tion as a further radial distance from the borehole. Accordingly, in the disclosure that follows, the term 'Ivertical'' when refer-ring to vertical fracturing, will include all other possible orientations of the :Eract~e in addition to the preferredvertical orientation.
It is a feature of the present invention to provide a method of creating long vertical llnear fractures within relatively thin hydrocarbon formations while substantially eliminating radial vertical fractures into the overlying and underlying shale or other non-producing formations.
It is another feature of the present invention to provide a fracing fluid containing a minimum water content which will adversely react with water sensitive clays entrapped in the producing formations.
It is still another eature of the present invention to provide a method of creating vertical linear fractures within a thin producing formation that are much wider than those produced by prior art methods, therefore exposing a much larger vertical area of the formation.
It is yet another ~eature o~ the present invention to provide a method of inserting several times the amount of solids into the formation for use as "propping agents" as heretofore has been injected using conventional fracing tech-niques.
These and other features and advantages of the pre-sent invention will become apparent from the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompany-~5 ing drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In order that the manner in which the above--recited advantages and features of the invention are attained can be understood in detail, and a more particular description i3 of the inventlon may be had by reference to the specific embodiment thereof when compared to an embodiment depicting the prior art, both of which are illustrated in the appended drawings, which drawings form a part of this specification.
It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawin~s illus-trate only the typical embodiment of the invention and there-fore is not to be considered limiting of its scope when the in-vention may admit to further equally effective embodiments.
In the drawings:
Fiyure 1 is a cross-sectional view illustrating a borehole penetrating an oil or gas bearing formation for in-troducing a fracing fluid into contact with the formation, and in particular shows the radial vertical fracturiny orientation of multiple pay zones and intervening non-producing formations occurring from conventional fracing techniques.
Figure 2 is a cross-sectional view of a borehole extending into a multiple pay zone hydrocarbon bearing formation and illustrates the long vertical linear fractures created khrough use o~ the present invention.
Figure 3 is a vertical cross-sectional view of a typical vertical linear fracture in the pay zone shown in Figure 2 as taken along lines 3--3 of Figure 2.
Figure 4 is a vertical cross-sectional view of a typical radial vertical fracture produced by prior art methods as taken along lines 4--4 of Eigure 1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFER~ED EMBODIMENT
.
The time for a pressure disturbance, that is, a pres-sure drop initiated by a producing well, to be propagated radially from the well bore through a low permeability earth formation, it may take the 20-year period to drain the 14.6-acre area reached by pressure wave front. Further extension will show that it will take the pressure wave 21.5 years to reach the perimeter of a 320-acre square centered on the well bore, and that the volume extending horizontally over such an area would be drainable in 430 years. The pressure wave would take 34 years in the case of a 640 acre tract (one square mile) which would be ~rainable in 680 years.
It will be apparent from the foregoing that in order to produce a low permeability field within a 20-year period, the well spacing would have to be approximately 900 feet. How ever, many states have statutes governing well densities in oil and gas fields. It can be seen that it would be impractical to economically produce a well in such a low permeability forma-tion without special producing techniques.
To speed up recovery from low permeability fields,techniques have been developed in the prior art directed to producing radial fractures in the ~ormation which act as drainage channels to permit the production fluid to drain to the well.
Generally, a high volume of fracing fluid, on the order of 5,000 or more gallons per stage, is pumped into the formation at a high input rate, in the range of 25 to 50 barrels per minute.
Additionally, various propping agen-ts have been utilized to maintain the fractures created in an open posi-tion after the fracturing pressure has been released. Forpurposes of definition within this application, reference to a "medium" size proppant shall mean a proppant having a mesh size falling within the range of 20 to 40. Furthex, reference to a "fine" size proppant shall mean a proppant having a mesh size falling within the range of 60 to 140. The above-mentioned definitions are not to be construed as limitations on the in-vention, as other proppant sizes may be equally effective in realizing the objectives of the invention. Among such proppinq agents used in the prior art is "medium" sand (20 to 40 mesh), used in preference to "fine" sand (60 to 140 mesh) in the belief that the fine sand would pack too tightly and actually cause the fracture-proppant volume to have a permeability lower than the formation. Generally, a low ratio of proppants to fracing fluid (such as 1/2 to 2 lbs. of sand per gallon of fluid) was utilized.
When used with a single, relatively thick, medium permeability pay zone, conventional fracing techniques develop-ed in the prior art have proved ade~uate. However, when the conventional fracing techni~ues are used to fracture low per-meability, relatively thin formations, such as found inseveral gas-sand areas in West Texas, the resulting ~roduction has been much less than expected, as will be hereina~ter explained.
Re~erring now to Figure 1~ conventional hydraulic racturing techni.ques utilize a well 10, having casing 12 extending through an overburden 14 into multiple gas sand pay zones 16, with the pay zones 16 being separated by non-oil or gas bearing strata, such as shale layers 18. A number of perforations 20 are conventionally formed in casing 12 extending into the pay zones 16. Further, a pump 22 connected by tubing 24 to a source o a sand and racing fluid mixtur~ 26 p~ps the fracing fluid mix into the casing 12 through tubing 28 where, as pressure builds up within casing 12, the fluid is forced out through perforations 20 i.nto the producing formations creating fractures 30. Due to the high 6i3 input rate, the pressure builds up rapidly extending the radial vertical fractures 30 in pay zones 16 through intervening non-producing formations 18. As a result, a large ~uantity of the fracing fluid and sand is deposited in fractures in zones and strata where there is no oil or gas. Additionally, the vertical extending formation of fractures 30 into upper and lower forma-tions tends ~o limit the radial length of the vertical frac-tures to an average length "X". As a result, the short radial vertical fractures within the producing formation expose only a limited area of the formation 16, resulting in production for only a relatively short time and further production must depend on the slow natural drainage through the low permeability of the formation into the fracture and then to the well bore.
According to the present invention, long vertical linear fractures extending outward from the well casing into a desired producing formation with substantially no vertically oriented fractures extending into overlying or underlying non~producing formations are obtained as will be hereinafter described. Refer-ring now to Figure 2, the same reference numbers used for Figure 1 have been used to identify similar components for simplicity.
Accordingly, well 10 is shown to include casing 12 extending through overburden 14 into multiple gas-sand pay zones 16, which are separated by intervening shale layers 18. Pump 22 is shown connected to a source of sand and fracing fluid mixture 26 by tubing 24 and pumps the proppant-laden fracing fluid into the tubing (not shown) within casing 12 through piping 28. Conven-tional techniques are utilized to perforate the casing 12 adjacent a single~pay zone 16 as shown by perforations 20.
~ Thereafter, the perforated section of the casing is isolated in order that as the fracinq fluid is injected, it only affects the single pay zone. A relatively low volume of fracing fluid (2,000 to 5,000 gallons per stage~ with a high ratio of solids ~in this case, sand), such as 4 to 10 lbs.
(or greater) of sand per gallon of fracing fluid is injected into the single pay zone 16. A low input rate (such as 9 to 15 barrels per minute) is used which results in the ability to use a 2 to 3-inch tubing for the fracing fluid injection, as opposed to a much larger casing which must be utilized in the conventional fracing method because of the high input rates.
Further, the pressure required to fracture the formation is confined to the tubing and the casing adjacent the formation, reducing the surface area on which the pressure must be main-tained.
As will be hereinafter described, multiple stages of proppant-laden fracing fluid alternated with corresponding unladen fracing fluid stages are injected causing vertically oriented fractures 50 to extend linearly outward for a length defined by "Y" with little or no radial vertical fracturing occurring outside of the treated pay zone 16. The in-creased surface area of formation 16 exposed to the longerfracture 50 substantially increases production. Further, by confining fracturing to a single formation, an increased effi-ciency o~ production is obtained from that pay zone, without drawing from other zones simultaneously. Once a lowermost formation 16 has been depleted, then the casing 12 would be plugged to seal off the already produced formation and a higher formation would be treated and produced as hereinabove described.
As previously described, prior art fracing processes utilized in such thin multiple pay zones 16 only obtained fractures 30 having a radial length "X" and a "propped" width "B" (see Figure 4) of 0.10 inches or less, often in the range of 0.0625 inches utilizing a "medium" proppant 35. Utilizing the process of the present invention, a fracture 50 having a length "Y" (as compared to "X"~ can be obtained, with a "propped"
width "A" (see Figure 3) of approximately 0.25 inches utilizing a "fine" proppant 37. As hereinabove described, the longer the linear fracture 50 can be made, the greater the producing formation 16 vertical cross-sectional area will be exposed to the fracture S0 to form a low pressure channel to the casing 12, thereby increasing productivity ~rom the pay zone. As can be seen from Figures l and 2, a certain cross-sectional area of formation 16 is exposed to fractures 30 and 50. Fracture 50 can often be at least 2-5 times the length of fracture 30, thereby increasing the total vertical cross-sectional area exposed to the fracture by at least 200-500~ with corresponding increases in productivity. In one test well in which 1,000,000 pounds of proppant (fine sand) was deposited in the formation fracture utilizing the process of this invention, logs and other test data indicated a probable linear fracture of over 2,000 feet wholly within the gas formation.
The methods of the invention can be carried out by any conventional apparatus used for previously known methods of hydraulic fracturing. Thus, suitable apparatus is shown in both Figure 1, the prior art, and Figure 2 of this appli-cation. The fracturing fluid can be injected through the well tubing, casing or other available or suitable pipe or conduit, and may be flowed back into a pit or into the fracturing fluid tank. The fluid can be injected through perforations in the casing extending through the cement and ... . , ~
directly into the formation, the injection being confined to a selected horizontal thin formation through conventional isolation techniques. Additionally, conventional proppant water mixing equipment and pumping equipment may be utilized in performlng the method.
The fracturing fluid preferably used in carrying out the method of the present invention is a 2-3% KCl (potassium chloride) water containing conventional gels to increase its viscosity, and is mixed with liquified carbon dioxide (CO2) in predetermined ratios preselected from the range of 10~ to 20 C2 by volume. The CO2 is maintained at -10 F. until combined with the KCl water in mixer 26 just prior to the ~racing fluid being pumped into well 12. During injection the CO2 remains liquified since it is under pressure, and only after the temperature reaches 85 F. at the fracing pressures in the formation does the CO2 change to gaseous form. This change to a gas has two benefits. One benefit is the additional energy (when the CO gasifies) which assists in removing frac water from the well bore. A second benefit is the reduction o~ "wet"
fluid injected into the formation which must be recovered.
Since many of the producing formations encountered in the multiple pay zone areas of West Texas include water sensitive clays, it is advantageous to reduce the amount of water injected into the formation. In addition to the conven-tional reduction of water by the above-mentioned addition of CO2, water used in the fracing fluid may be further reduced by the addition of a suitable alcohol in predetermined ratios of up to 70~ alcohol by volume of the total ~racing fluid. A
suitabIe alcohol for purposes of this application is defined as any alcohol which will reduce the surface tension of the remain-ing water to enhance pumping of the fracing fluid and, equally important, is miscible ~ith water. By way of example, 57,000 gallons of the preferred fracing fluid could be made up utiliz-ing 13,680 gallons of sand, 11,400 gallons of liquified CO2, 8,880 gallons of H2O and 23,040 gallons or methanol or iso-propyl or other suitable alcohol. Further, the use of frac-ing fluid combined with alcohol and C02 within the ratios above-described has led to the recovery of injected fluids in ranges of 80 to 95~.
The injection time depends on the volume of fracing fluid to be injected, which ls determined by how large a fracture is desired and is calculated in advance, and upon the flow rate, which depends on the pressure and flow resis-tance. Further, the total injection time will be the sum of the injection times for the various multiple stages.
The following is an example of an experimental well stimulation treatment carried out according to the invention in a Wést Texas gas field:
EX~MPLE
Formation Thickness 28' Depth: 7082' to 711Q' Materials: 3~ KCl water plus 20%
by volume Co2 and in-cluding a base fluid gel having a density of 40#/gal. gelling agent Propping Agent: Sand, average 100 mesh, 488,600 lbs. and 20/40 mesh 51,000 lbs Casing: 4-1/2" O.D.
Tubing: 2-7/8" O.D.
Perforations: 22 Pressure Average on casing 1500 lbs.
Average on tubing 5500 :Lbs.
Hydraulic Horsepower Usedo 2022 Average Rates in barrels per minute 15 Number of staqes 40 Volumes:
Pre PAD 10,000 gal.
P~D 7,000 gal.
Proppant Laden Fluid66, ooa gal.
Displacement1,000 gal.
Total Fluid 84,000 Volume Event Rate (Incremental Pressure ~psi) Description of No. (bpm) Volume) (Tubing) (Casing) Operation & Materials 1 Test Line 2 0-157000 0-5000 1500 Pump Pad
3 153000 5200 1500 Start sand 4 ppg ~ 15 500 5400 1500 Pump Spacer 163000 5100 1500 Start sand at 6 ppg 6 10 500 5400 1500 Pump Spacer 7 163000 5200 1500 Start sand at 8 ppg 8 15 500 S200 1500 Pump Spacer 9 153000 5200 1500 Start sand at 8 ppg 151000 5300 1500 Pump Spacer 11 153000 5200 1500 Start sand at 10 ppg 12 15 500 5400 1500 Pump Spacer 13 153000 52Q0 1500 Start sand.at 10 ppg 14 15 500 5200 1500 Pump Spacer 153000 5300 1500 Start sand at 10 ppg 16 15 500 5300 1500 Pump Spacer 17 153000 5500 1500 Start sand at 10 ppg 18 15 500 5500 1500 Pump Spacer 1~ 133000 5500 1500 Start sand at 10 ppg 13 500 6400 1500 Pump Spacer 21 133000 5400 1500 Start sand at 10 ppg 22 13 500 6400 1500 Pump Spacer 23 13-153000 6400 1500 S~art sand at 10 ppg 24 15 500 5100 1500 Pump Spacer 153000 5600 1500 Start sand at 10 ppg 26 15 500 5400 1500 Pump Spacer 27 153000 5100 1500 Start sand at 10 ppg 28 15 500 5200 1500 Pump Spacer 29 153000 5400 1500 Start sand at 10 ppg 14 500 5700 1500 Pump Spacex 31 1430.00 5700 1500 Start sand at 10 ppg 32 14 500 6400 1500 Pump Spacer 33 13 500 6300 1500 Start sand at 10 ppg 34 14 500 6100 1500 Pump Spacer 143000 5700 1500 Start sand at 10 ppg 36 14 500 5500 1500 Pump Spacer 37 143000 5500 1500 Start sand at 10 ppg 38 151000 5500 1500 Spacer 39 12000 5500 1500 20-40 sand at 3 ppg The 488,600 lbs. of average 100 mesh sand was injected at a ratio o~ 10 lhsO/gal., while the larger 20-40 mesh sand was injected at 3 lbs./gal.
In a typical fracing treatment, it has been found desirable to average at least an 8-lb./gal. solids ratio of the "fine" proppant (defined above as 60-140 rnesh) to fracing fluids. A solids ratio of 12 lbs./gal. has been achieved, but with more advanced blending equipment, solids ratios of 15-20 lbs./gal. should be possible. Of course, a proppant of any suitable size can be utilized if the objectives of the invention are achieved. The final proppant applications were made utilizing a "mediwn" mesh sand (20-40 mesh), however, other sizes of final proppant could be utilized.
The preferred injection rate is in the range of 10-15 barrels per minute, however, a range of 2-15 barrels per minute has been utilized to obtain satisfactory results and rates of 5 barrels per minute or below may produce preferred results 15` depending on the geology of the pay zone. In field tests, the volume of proppant injected into the producing formation has varied from 200,000 lbs. to 1,000,000 lbs. of proppant in a single pay zone, utilizing fracing fluid volumes of approximatly 50,000 gallons to 200,000 gallons, respectively, for overall average solids ratios of 7 to 8 lbs.~gal. In practicing the invention successfully, it has been found that a raiio of at least 25,000 lbs. of proppant per one (1) foot of net pay zone is desirable and can be achieved.
Although specific embodiments have been described in detail hereinbefore, it is understood that the subject invention is not limited thereto, and all variations and modifications thereof are contemplated and included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
In a typical fracing treatment, it has been found desirable to average at least an 8-lb./gal. solids ratio of the "fine" proppant (defined above as 60-140 rnesh) to fracing fluids. A solids ratio of 12 lbs./gal. has been achieved, but with more advanced blending equipment, solids ratios of 15-20 lbs./gal. should be possible. Of course, a proppant of any suitable size can be utilized if the objectives of the invention are achieved. The final proppant applications were made utilizing a "mediwn" mesh sand (20-40 mesh), however, other sizes of final proppant could be utilized.
The preferred injection rate is in the range of 10-15 barrels per minute, however, a range of 2-15 barrels per minute has been utilized to obtain satisfactory results and rates of 5 barrels per minute or below may produce preferred results 15` depending on the geology of the pay zone. In field tests, the volume of proppant injected into the producing formation has varied from 200,000 lbs. to 1,000,000 lbs. of proppant in a single pay zone, utilizing fracing fluid volumes of approximatly 50,000 gallons to 200,000 gallons, respectively, for overall average solids ratios of 7 to 8 lbs.~gal. In practicing the invention successfully, it has been found that a raiio of at least 25,000 lbs. of proppant per one (1) foot of net pay zone is desirable and can be achieved.
Although specific embodiments have been described in detail hereinbefore, it is understood that the subject invention is not limited thereto, and all variations and modifications thereof are contemplated and included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
Claims (23)
1. A method of forming vertical linear fractures in a subterranean producing formation extending outwardly from a well penetrating the formation without forming any substantial radial vertical fracturing of overlying or underlying strata, comprising the steps of introducing, in a multiplicity of stages a proppant laden fracing fluid carrying a fine-sized proppant material in an average proppant-to-fluid ratio of at least eight pounds per gallon, introducing between said stages of proppant laden fracing fluid a spacer stage of fracing fluid without proppant, said proppant laden fracing fluid and said spacer fracing fluid being injected at an injection rate below 25 barrels per minute and at a pressure selected for producing said vertical linear fracture in the formation, said intro-duction of said proppant laden fracing fluid continuing until at least 25,000 pounds of said fine proppant material have been deposited in the formation fracture for each one-foot of available net producing formation.
2. The method described in claim 1, wherein a terminal stage of said fracing fluid carrying a medium-sized proppant material in a proppant-to-fluid ratio less than said fine-sized proppant material proppant-to-fluid ratio is introduced into said fractures for depositing said medium-sized proppant material in the formation adjacent the well bore.
3. The method described in claim 1, wherein said fine-sized proppant material is 60-140 mesh sand.
4. The method described in claim 2, wherein said medium-sized proppant material is 20-90 mesh sand.
5. The method described in claim 1, wherein said fracing fluid is a combination of KCl water, gel and alcohol, and the volume of alcohol combined with said FCl water to form the total volume of said fracing fluid is preselected from the range of 25% to 70% alcohol by volume.
6. The method described in claim 1, wherein said fracing fluid injection rate is selected from within the range of 2 to 20 barrels per minute.
7. The method described in claim 1, wherein said fine-sized proppant material proppant-to-fluid ratio is selected from the range of 8 to 20 pounds of proppant per gallon of fracing fluid.
8. The method disclosed in claim 1, wherein said fracing fluid is a combination of KCl water, gel, alcohol and liquified CO2.
9. The method disclosed in claim 8, wherein the volume of alcohol combined with said KCl water to form the total volume of said fracing fluid is preselected from the range of 25% to 70% alcohol by volume, and the volume of CO2 combined with said KCl water to form said total volume of fracing fluid is preselected from the range of 10% to 20% liquified CO2 by volume.
10. The method disclosed in claim 9, wherein said carrier stage injection rate is selected from within the range of 2 to 20 barrels per minute.
11. The method disclosoed in claim 9, wherein said fine-sized proppant material proppant-to-fluid ratio is selected from the range of 8 to 20 pounds of proppant per gallon of fracing fluid.
12. A method of forming vertical linear fractures in a subterranean producing formation extending outwardly from a well penetrating the formation without forming any substantial radial vertical fracturing of overlying or underlying strata, comprising the steps of introducing a plurality of carrier stages of fracing fluid carrying a fine-sized proppant material in an average proppant-to-fluid ratio of at least eight pounds per gallon, said carrier stage fracing fluid being injected at an injection rate below 25 barrels per minute and at a pressure selected for producing the fractures in the formation, introducing a plurality of spacer stages of said fracing fluid, alternating with said carrier stages, at a selected pressure and rate sufficient to carry said carrier stage proppant material into said fracture and away from said well, and introducing a terminal stage of said fracing fluid carrying a medium-sized proppant material in a proppant-to-fluid ratio less than said carrier stage ratio, said terminal stage being injected at a selected pressure and rate sufficient to carry said terminal stage sand into said fractures adjacent said injection well bore.
13. The method described in claim 12, wherein said fine-sized proppant material is 60-140 mesh sand.
14. The method described in claim 13, wherein said medium-sized proppant material is 20-40 mesh sand.
15. The method described in claim 12, wherein said fracing fluid is a combination of KCl water, gel and alcohol, and the volume of alcohol combined with said KCl water to form the
15. The method described in claim 12, wherein said fracing fluid is a combination of KCl water, gel and alcohol, and the volume of alcohol combined with said KCl water to form the
Claim 15 continued ....
total volume of said fracing fluid is preselected from the range of 25% to 70% alcohol by volume
total volume of said fracing fluid is preselected from the range of 25% to 70% alcohol by volume
16. The method described in claim 12, wherein said carrier stage injection rate is selected from the range of 2 to 20 barrels per minute.
17. The method described in claim 12, wherein said carrier stage proppant-to-fluid ratio is selected from the range of 8 to 20 pounds of proppant per gallon of fracing fluid.
18. The method disclosed in claim 12, wherein introduction of said carrier stages is continued to achieve a proppant volume of at least 25,000 pounds of said fine-sized proppant material deposited into the formation fracture for each one-foot of vertical net pay zone of the formation.
19. The method disclosed in claim 12, wherein said fracing fluid is a combination of KCl water, gel, alcohol and liquified CO2.
20. The method disclosed in claim 19, wherein the volume of alcohol combined with said KCl water to form the total volume of said fracing fluid is preselected from the range of 25% to 70% alcohol by volume, and the volume of CO2 combined with said KCl water to form said total volume of fracing fluid is preselected from the range of 10% to 20% liquified CO2 by volume.
21. The method disclosed in claim 20, wherein said carrier stage injection rate is selected from the range of 2 to 20 barrels per minute.
22. The method disclosed in claim 20, wherein said carrier stage proppant-to-fluid ratio is selected from the range of 8 to 20 pounds of proppant per gallon of fracing fluid.
23. The method disclosed in claim 22, wherein introduction of said carrier stages is continued to achieve a proppant volume of 25,000 pounds of said fine-sized proppant material deposited into the formation fracture for each one-foot of vertical net pay zone of the formation.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA328,865A CA1110163A (en) | 1979-05-30 | 1979-05-30 | Fracing process |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA328,865A CA1110163A (en) | 1979-05-30 | 1979-05-30 | Fracing process |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1110163A true CA1110163A (en) | 1981-10-06 |
Family
ID=4114326
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA328,865A Expired CA1110163A (en) | 1979-05-30 | 1979-05-30 | Fracing process |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA1110163A (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US10012064B2 (en) | 2015-04-09 | 2018-07-03 | Highlands Natural Resources, Plc | Gas diverter for well and reservoir stimulation |
| US10344204B2 (en) | 2015-04-09 | 2019-07-09 | Diversion Technologies, LLC | Gas diverter for well and reservoir stimulation |
| US10982520B2 (en) | 2016-04-27 | 2021-04-20 | Highland Natural Resources, PLC | Gas diverter for well and reservoir stimulation |
-
1979
- 1979-05-30 CA CA328,865A patent/CA1110163A/en not_active Expired
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US10012064B2 (en) | 2015-04-09 | 2018-07-03 | Highlands Natural Resources, Plc | Gas diverter for well and reservoir stimulation |
| US10344204B2 (en) | 2015-04-09 | 2019-07-09 | Diversion Technologies, LLC | Gas diverter for well and reservoir stimulation |
| US10385258B2 (en) | 2015-04-09 | 2019-08-20 | Highlands Natural Resources, Plc | Gas diverter for well and reservoir stimulation |
| US10385257B2 (en) | 2015-04-09 | 2019-08-20 | Highands Natural Resources, PLC | Gas diverter for well and reservoir stimulation |
| US10982520B2 (en) | 2016-04-27 | 2021-04-20 | Highland Natural Resources, PLC | Gas diverter for well and reservoir stimulation |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4186802A (en) | Fracing process | |
| US6119776A (en) | Methods of stimulating and producing multiple stratified reservoirs | |
| CA1270188A (en) | Process for selectively treating a subterranean formation using coiled tubing without affecting or being affected by the two adjacent zones | |
| CA1228804A (en) | Hydraulic fracturing method employing special sand control technique | |
| US5273115A (en) | Method for refracturing zones in hydrocarbon-producing wells | |
| US4378845A (en) | Sand control method employing special hydraulic fracturing technique | |
| US6095244A (en) | Methods of stimulating and producing multiple stratified reservoirs | |
| US4869322A (en) | Sequential hydraulic fracturing of a subsurface formation | |
| CA1222942A (en) | Multiple-stage coal seam fracturing method | |
| US5425421A (en) | Method for sealing unwanted fractures in fluid-producing earth formations | |
| US4421167A (en) | Method of controlling displacement of propping agent in fracturing treatments | |
| US4566539A (en) | Coal seam fracing method | |
| US4387770A (en) | Process for selective injection into a subterranean formation | |
| US4415035A (en) | Method for fracturing a plurality of subterranean formations | |
| AU745665B2 (en) | Chemically induced stimulations of subterranean carbonaceous formations with gaseous oxidants | |
| GB2050467A (en) | Fracturing Subterranean Formations | |
| Holditch et al. | Successful Stimulation of Deep Wells Using High Proppant Concentrations | |
| CA1110163A (en) | Fracing process | |
| Murphy et al. | Pin-Point Sandfracturing-A Method of Simultaneous Injection into Selected Sands | |
| US5199766A (en) | Cavity induced stimulation of coal degasification wells using solvents | |
| Humoodi et al. | Implementation of hydraulic fracturing operation for a reservoir in KRG | |
| US5322122A (en) | Simultaneous acid fracturing using acids with different densities | |
| US3138204A (en) | Method of improving injectivity of water-solvent mixtures | |
| US5314020A (en) | Technique for maximizing effectiveness of fracturing in massive intervals | |
| Snow et al. | Field and laboratory experience in stimulating ekofisk area north sea chalk reservoirs |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |