CA1103040A - Leaching of nickeliferous oxide ores - Google Patents
Leaching of nickeliferous oxide oresInfo
- Publication number
- CA1103040A CA1103040A CA308,444A CA308444A CA1103040A CA 1103040 A CA1103040 A CA 1103040A CA 308444 A CA308444 A CA 308444A CA 1103040 A CA1103040 A CA 1103040A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- slurry
- ore
- water
- added
- neutralized
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 title claims description 26
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 69
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 62
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 229910052783 alkali metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 150000001340 alkali metals Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 150000003868 ammonium compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims description 24
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- PMZURENOXWZQFD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sodium Sulfate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O PMZURENOXWZQFD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims description 21
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 19
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 16
- 229910052938 sodium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 13
- 235000011152 sodium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 claims description 13
- CPLXHLVBOLITMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Magnesium oxide Chemical compound [Mg]=O CPLXHLVBOLITMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 8
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 6
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 6
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000000395 magnesium oxide Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- NLXLAEXVIDQMFP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonia chloride Chemical compound [NH4+].[Cl-] NLXLAEXVIDQMFP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- WCUXLLCKKVVCTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M Potassium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[K+] WCUXLLCKKVVCTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 4
- CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sodium Carbonate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]C([O-])=O CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims description 4
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 4
- FGIUAXJPYTZDNR-UHFFFAOYSA-N potassium nitrate Chemical compound [K+].[O-][N+]([O-])=O FGIUAXJPYTZDNR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- VWDWKYIASSYTQR-UHFFFAOYSA-N sodium nitrate Chemical compound [Na+].[O-][N+]([O-])=O VWDWKYIASSYTQR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- LWIHDJKSTIGBAC-UHFFFAOYSA-K tripotassium phosphate Chemical compound [K+].[K+].[K+].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O LWIHDJKSTIGBAC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 claims description 4
- PAWQVTBBRAZDMG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-(3-bromo-2-fluorophenyl)acetic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)CC1=CC=CC(Br)=C1F PAWQVTBBRAZDMG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- VHUUQVKOLVNVRT-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonium hydroxide Chemical compound [NH4+].[OH-] VHUUQVKOLVNVRT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004254 Ammonium phosphate Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004111 Potassium silicate Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004115 Sodium Silicate Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- BIGPRXCJEDHCLP-UHFFFAOYSA-N ammonium bisulfate Chemical compound [NH4+].OS([O-])(=O)=O BIGPRXCJEDHCLP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000019270 ammonium chloride Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000908 ammonium hydroxide Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000011114 ammonium hydroxide Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910000148 ammonium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000019289 ammonium phosphates Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- BFNBIHQBYMNNAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N ammonium sulfate Chemical compound N.N.OS(O)(=O)=O BFNBIHQBYMNNAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052921 ammonium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000011130 ammonium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- MNNHAPBLZZVQHP-UHFFFAOYSA-N diammonium hydrogen phosphate Chemical compound [NH4+].[NH4+].OP([O-])([O-])=O MNNHAPBLZZVQHP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000001103 potassium chloride Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000011164 potassium chloride Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004323 potassium nitrate Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000010333 potassium nitrate Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910000160 potassium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000011009 potassium phosphates Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- NNHHDJVEYQHLHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N potassium silicate Chemical compound [K+].[K+].[O-][Si]([O-])=O NNHHDJVEYQHLHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052913 potassium silicate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000019353 potassium silicate Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- OTYBMLCTZGSZBG-UHFFFAOYSA-L potassium sulfate Chemical compound [K+].[K+].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O OTYBMLCTZGSZBG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052939 potassium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000011151 potassium sulphates Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- WBHQBSYUUJJSRZ-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium bisulfate Chemical compound [Na+].OS([O-])(=O)=O WBHQBSYUUJJSRZ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910000029 sodium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000002639 sodium chloride Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004317 sodium nitrate Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000010344 sodium nitrate Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000001488 sodium phosphate Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910000162 sodium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000011008 sodium phosphates Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- NTHWMYGWWRZVTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N sodium silicate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-][Si]([O-])=O NTHWMYGWWRZVTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052911 sodium silicate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000019794 sodium silicate Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- RYFMWSXOAZQYPI-UHFFFAOYSA-K trisodium phosphate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O RYFMWSXOAZQYPI-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 claims description 2
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims 6
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 claims 3
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims 3
- JTNCEQNHURODLX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-phenylethanimidamide Chemical compound NC(=N)CC1=CC=CC=C1 JTNCEQNHURODLX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims 1
- UIIMBOGNXHQVGW-DEQYMQKBSA-M Sodium bicarbonate-14C Chemical compound [Na+].O[14C]([O-])=O UIIMBOGNXHQVGW-DEQYMQKBSA-M 0.000 claims 1
- 238000006386 neutralization reaction Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 229910000343 potassium bisulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims 1
- 229940093928 potassium nitrate Drugs 0.000 claims 1
- 229910000342 sodium bisulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims 1
- 235000017550 sodium carbonate Nutrition 0.000 claims 1
- 235000011121 sodium hydroxide Nutrition 0.000 claims 1
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 abstract description 22
- 238000005056 compaction Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- BPQQTUXANYXVAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Orthosilicate Chemical compound [O-][Si]([O-])([O-])[O-] BPQQTUXANYXVAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000002562 thickening agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 150000001339 alkali metal compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- -1 ammonium cations Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 229910017052 cobalt Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010941 cobalt Substances 0.000 description 2
- GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt atom Chemical compound [Co] GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000010908 decantation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003472 neutralizing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- HRPVXLWXLXDGHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acrylamide Chemical compound NC(=O)C=C HRPVXLWXLXDGHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-O Ammonium Chemical compound [NH4+] QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-O 0.000 description 1
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-M Bicarbonate Chemical compound OC([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 241000353355 Oreosoma atlanticum Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000003513 alkali Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000001166 ammonium sulphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001768 cations Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005007 materials handling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- CHKVPAROMQMJNQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M potassium bisulfate Chemical compound [K+].OS([O-])(=O)=O CHKVPAROMQMJNQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 239000001120 potassium sulphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000004760 silicates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B23/00—Obtaining nickel or cobalt
- C22B23/04—Obtaining nickel or cobalt by wet processes
- C22B23/0407—Leaching processes
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Water-soluble alkali metal or ammonium com-pounds are added to slurries of nickeliferous oxide ores which are leached with sulfuric acid at tempera-tures between about 230° and about 300°C. The alkali metal or ammonium compound additions improve the handling characteristics of the slurry, nickel recov-eries, settling rates and compaction rates and lower scaling rates.
Water-soluble alkali metal or ammonium com-pounds are added to slurries of nickeliferous oxide ores which are leached with sulfuric acid at tempera-tures between about 230° and about 300°C. The alkali metal or ammonium compound additions improve the handling characteristics of the slurry, nickel recov-eries, settling rates and compaction rates and lower scaling rates.
Description
~ 1~3c~41~ CASE PC--887 IMPROVEMENTS IN LEACHING NICXEI~EF~US OXIDE ORES
The present invention relates to leaching nickel fr~m nickelif3rous oxlde ores and, more particularly, to the acid leaching of such ores.
A number of procesæes for leaching nickel from nickeliferous oxide ores are known. One process is des-cribed in "The Winning of Nickel" by Boldt and Queneau, published by Longman's Canada Ltd., Toronto at pages 437 to 444. The process described by Boldt and Queneau is the process used at Moa Bay for leaching nickel from nickeliferous limonites ~high iron, low magnesia oxide ores).
Raw nickeliferous limonite is slurried with water and pre-heated to between 230C and about 260~C. The preheated slurry is then fed to the firæt of a series of autoclaves along with the requisite amount o~ sulfuric acid. The acidified slurry is then flowed through the train of auto-claves by gravityO Total leaching time i9 between 1 and
The present invention relates to leaching nickel fr~m nickelif3rous oxlde ores and, more particularly, to the acid leaching of such ores.
A number of procesæes for leaching nickel from nickeliferous oxide ores are known. One process is des-cribed in "The Winning of Nickel" by Boldt and Queneau, published by Longman's Canada Ltd., Toronto at pages 437 to 444. The process described by Boldt and Queneau is the process used at Moa Bay for leaching nickel from nickeliferous limonites ~high iron, low magnesia oxide ores).
Raw nickeliferous limonite is slurried with water and pre-heated to between 230C and about 260~C. The preheated slurry is then fed to the firæt of a series of autoclaves along with the requisite amount o~ sulfuric acid. The acidified slurry is then flowed through the train of auto-claves by gravityO Total leaching time i9 between 1 and
2 hours. After lowering the slurry to atmospheric temp-eratures and pressures the resulting pregnant solution i9 separated from the residual solids in gtandard thickeners Although the proce~s used at Moa Bay effectively recovered nickel and cobalt from nickel;iferous limonitic ores, a number of operational problems were encountered.
For example, the pumping of raw ore slurries encountered ~ome difficulties.
In accordance with the inventian there ..
is provided a process for acid leaching nickeliferou~
oxide ores, in which a water-soluble alkali metal or ammonium compound is added to an aqueous slurry of the ore in small but effective amounts to increase nickel recovery, to increase the settling rate of solids and to lower the viscosity of the slurry to improve slurry handling characteristics.
,, ~
~3~:D4~
ThR amount of the water-soluble a~ etal c ~ ound added to the slurry is dependent upon the favorable result de-sired, the nature of the ore being treated and the leach-ing conditions employed. The slurry is generally pre-heated to a leaching temperature between about 230C. andabout 300C, and sulfuric acid is added to the preheated slurry to leach substantially all the n~ckel from the nickeliferous oxide ore.
All nickeliferous oxide ores can be treated by the process in accordance with the present invention.
However, the process of the present invention fi~ its greatest utility in treating nickeli~us silicate ores, i.e., ores having comparatively low iron contents and com-paratively high magnesia contents, often referred to as garnierites. Deep sea nodules can also be treated by the process in accordance with the present invention and are intended to fall within the term "nickeliferous oxide ores " .
Raw ore from the mine is, if necessary, crushed or ground without drying to provide a feed material that will form stable slurries and will readily react with the leaching solution. ~f the ore must be ground, it is ground to a particle size such that about 10~% pas~e~
through a 30 mesh screen ~U.S. Screen Size). The finely divided ore is then formed into an aqueous slurry con-taining between about 25% solids and about 50% sollds, and advantageously between about 35~ solids and about 45% solids. Slurries containing sollds wlthin the fore-going ranges minimize materials handling problems while insuring efficient utilization of autoclave capacity.
The slurried ore is fed to a preheating vessel in which the slurry is preheated to a leaching temp-erature between about 230C. and about 300C. Preheating can be accomplished indirectly or by in~ecting live steam into the slurry. The preheated slurry is then fed to an autoclave where sulfuric acid in an amount between about 0.15 part and 0.8 part for each part of dry ore is added. Nickelifer~us oxide ores are generally a blend of limonitic and silicate fractions, and higher iron contents up to 55% indicate increasing amounts of the ,~
.
For example, the pumping of raw ore slurries encountered ~ome difficulties.
In accordance with the inventian there ..
is provided a process for acid leaching nickeliferou~
oxide ores, in which a water-soluble alkali metal or ammonium compound is added to an aqueous slurry of the ore in small but effective amounts to increase nickel recovery, to increase the settling rate of solids and to lower the viscosity of the slurry to improve slurry handling characteristics.
,, ~
~3~:D4~
ThR amount of the water-soluble a~ etal c ~ ound added to the slurry is dependent upon the favorable result de-sired, the nature of the ore being treated and the leach-ing conditions employed. The slurry is generally pre-heated to a leaching temperature between about 230C. andabout 300C, and sulfuric acid is added to the preheated slurry to leach substantially all the n~ckel from the nickeliferous oxide ore.
All nickeliferous oxide ores can be treated by the process in accordance with the present invention.
However, the process of the present invention fi~ its greatest utility in treating nickeli~us silicate ores, i.e., ores having comparatively low iron contents and com-paratively high magnesia contents, often referred to as garnierites. Deep sea nodules can also be treated by the process in accordance with the present invention and are intended to fall within the term "nickeliferous oxide ores " .
Raw ore from the mine is, if necessary, crushed or ground without drying to provide a feed material that will form stable slurries and will readily react with the leaching solution. ~f the ore must be ground, it is ground to a particle size such that about 10~% pas~e~
through a 30 mesh screen ~U.S. Screen Size). The finely divided ore is then formed into an aqueous slurry con-taining between about 25% solids and about 50% sollds, and advantageously between about 35~ solids and about 45% solids. Slurries containing sollds wlthin the fore-going ranges minimize materials handling problems while insuring efficient utilization of autoclave capacity.
The slurried ore is fed to a preheating vessel in which the slurry is preheated to a leaching temp-erature between about 230C. and about 300C. Preheating can be accomplished indirectly or by in~ecting live steam into the slurry. The preheated slurry is then fed to an autoclave where sulfuric acid in an amount between about 0.15 part and 0.8 part for each part of dry ore is added. Nickelifer~us oxide ores are generally a blend of limonitic and silicate fractions, and higher iron contents up to 55% indicate increasing amounts of the ,~
.
3~4~
~. ~
limonitic fractionO Acid additions are keyed to the nature of the ore being treated. Sulfuric acid is added in amounts between about 0.15 part and about 0.3 parts for each part of dry ore and between about 0.45 part and about 0.8 part for each part of dry ore for limonitic and silicate ores, respecti~ely, and for ores that are blends of limonites and sillcates the acid additions are adjusted in accordance with the relative proportions of limonites and sllicates in the particular blend. For most oxi~e ores which are a blend of limonites and silicates, acid additions in amounts between about 0.1 part and about 0.4 part per part of dry ore are generally sufficient. The autoclave is maintained at a temperature between about 230C. and about 300C. to leach about at least 90% of nickel contained in the feed material. Advantageously, the process i~ conducted on a continuous basis by employing a train of autoclaves and feeding the preheated slurry to the first autoclave and transferring slurry from one autoclave to another by gravity or by employing a single ~utoclave having a series of baffles that permit contlnuous operation.
~gain, the requisite amount of acld is added to the autoclave to insure that at least about 90% of the nickel is extracted from the ore.
The sulfuric acid can be added to the preheated slurry either as a single additlon or incrementally to the autoclave or autoclaves to maintain the aluminum content of the aqueous solution at a value of less than 3 grams per liter. When using incremental additions, between 5% and 75%, preferably between 40% and 70%, of the total acid is initially added to the autoclave or the first autoclave in a train and the remainder of acid is then added in at least two equal stages or in substantially equal amounts to each of the autoclaves in the train.
When the leaching reactions are completed, the reacted slurry can be cooled to below its boiling point, let down to atmospheric pressure and then neutralized with fresh ore, such as a high magnesia nickeliferous oxide, or other suitable neutralizing reagent.
.. , . . , , :
.
3~
~, ~
~ 4--Advantageously, the reacted slurry is first neutralized with fresh ore before being cooled to below its boillng point in atmospheric pre~sure in order to improve the kinetics of the neutralizing reactions at the elevated S temperatures. The neutralized slurry is then sub-jected to conventional liquid-solid separation tech-niques to provide a pregnant ~olution containing nickel and any cobalt and a spent residue that i~ sent to waste.
An important feature of the present invention is the addition of a water-soluble alkali metal or ammonium compound to the slurry to accomplish any one or all of the following advantages: improvement of the handling characteristics of the slurry, improved nickel recoveries, decreased scaling rates, increased settling rates or increased compaction of the solids upon liquid-solid separatlon. The water-soluble alkali metals or ammonium compound has its greatest effect on silicate ores and while there is less L~prove~ent in these propertles when treating limonitic ores, the improvement is still significant. Depending upon the objectives to be achieved by the addition of the alkali metal or ammonium compounds, the addition can be made to the slurry immediately prior to that stage of the process where the particular ob~ective is to be realized. Because the alkali metal and ammonium cations react with solubilized iron and aluminum to ~orm hlghly insoluble ~pecies of ~arosites and alun~tes whlch con-sume the cations, it is advantageous to add the c~mpounds when leaching is more than half complete. Of course, if the compound is added to improve the handling characteristics, the compound is added as the ore is being pulped with water. Additional quantities of the alkali metal compounds can be added during the leaching stage as well.
The nature of the ore as well as the ob~ective to be achieved by the addition of the water-soluble alkali metal or ammonium compound will determine the amount of the compound added to the slurry. For example, if it is desired to improve the handling characteristics, i.e.
' ' . :
-- ~ ilO3~
lowering the viscosity of the slurry of a given ore, in-creasing amounts of the alkali or ammonium metal com-pound are added to the slurry un~il no further lowering of the viscosity is observed. From an operational standpoint, it is rarely necessary tc use amounts of the alkali metal or ammonium compound in excess of amounts equivalent to an anhydrous sodium sulfate addition of about 5%, based on the dry weight of the ore. All of the advantages can usually be achieved for most ores when the alkali metal or ammonium compound is added to the slurry in amounts equivalent to anhydrous sodium sulfate additions between about 0.5% and about 2.5%, based on the dry weight of the ore, and advantageously in amounts between about 1.5% and about 2.5%.
Any water-soluble compound of an alkali metal or ammonium can be used for treating the slurry.
Examples of such water-soluble compounds include sodium sulphate, sodium chloride, sodium nitrate, sodium bi-sulphate, sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, sodium 20 bicarbonate, sodium phosphate, sodium silicate, ammonium sulphate, ammonium chloride, ammonium nitrate, ammonium bisulphate, ammonium hydroxide, ammonium phosphate, potassium sulphate, potassium chloride, potassium nitrate, potassium phosphate, potassium silicate and 25 potassium bisulphate. Compounds of other alkali metals are equally e~fective, but because o~ their cost it is preferred to employ the more common alkali metal com-pounds. From the standpoint of cost and avallability, sodium sulphate i~ the pre~erred compound.
In order to give those skilled in the art a better understanding o~ the present invention, the following illustrative examples are given:
A garnieritic ore containing 3.1% nickel was 35 pulped with water to provide a slurry containing 35~
solids. The slurry was preheated to 270C. and sulfuric acid in an amount of 0069 part for each part of the dry ore was incrementally added to the preheated slurry as the slu ~ was oonveyed by gravity through a series of three auto-.: ~
-6~ ~ 10 ~
claves which were maintalned at 270Cr A solution of sodium sulfate in an amount equivalent to 78 pounds of anhydrous sodium sulfate per ton of ore was added to the slurry midway thrGugh the traln of autoclaves. Upon flashing and subsequent liquid-solid separation in a counter-current decantation system, the first thickener provided an underflow residue containing 34% solids.
Analysis showed that 94.5~ of the nickel contained in the ore had been extracted.
A similar test was conducted for comparative purposes without a sodium sulfate addition. In this test, the underflow contained only 22% solids and the nickel extraction was on~y 92~5%. Thus, the sodium sulfate addition lowered the residual nickel in the leach residue by 27% and increased solids content in the underflow by 54.4%.
EXAMPLE II
. __ A nickeliferous oxide ore containing equal fractions of garnierite and limonite and having an overall nickel content of 2.1% was treated in the same manner as deYcribed in Example I except that a lower acid addition of 0.46 part per part of dry ore was employed because of the hlgher iron content of the overall ore and the sodium sulfate addition was equi-valent to an anhydrous sodium sulfate addition of 24pounds per ton of dry oreO The underflow ~rom the first thickener from the counter-current decantation circuit contained 51~ solids, when 0.42 pounds of a poly-acrylamide based flocculant was used per ton of solids in the residue, and analyses show that 96.8% of the nickel had been extractedc A comparative test without the sodium sulfate addition provided a nickel extraction of 94.2% and an underflow residue containing 41% solids with 1.23 pounds of flocculant. Thus, the sodium sulfate additions lowered the nickel content in the resldue by 45%, in-creased the ~olids content of the underflow by 25% and reduced the flocculant consumption by 65%.
EXAMPLE II~
A nickeliferous oxide ore having a nickel content .
.. : - .
.
..
:
.
_ ~ 1~
of 1.8~ was slurried with water to provide a slurry containing 45% solids. Sodium sulfate in an amount equivalent to 50 part of anhydrous sodium sulfate per ton of dry ore was added to the slurry.
The ore was preheated to 270C. and then fed to a train of gravity fed autoclaves maintained at 270C. Sulfuric acid was incrementally fed to the slurry as the slurry progressed from one autoclave to another in a total amount of 0.26 part for each part of ore.
Upon leaving the final autoclave the slurry was flashed and cooled to ambient temperatures. Liquid-solids separation produced an underflow re~idue containing 57% solids, and analyses showed that about 95.2% of the nickel contained in the ore had been extracted.
A comparative test without the sodium sulfate addition was run. The underflow from liquid-solid~
separation had a solids content of 47% and analyses ~howed that nickel extractions were only 94.1%.
EXAMPLE IV
This example coneirms that the addition of water-soluble alkali metal or ammonium compounds to the slurry i9 effective ln lowering the scaling rates generally encountered in the high temperature leaching of these ore~.
A nickel~fer~us oxide was slurried wlth water, preheated to 270C. and fed through a train of S auto-claves into the first three of which sulfurlc acid was incrementally added. In one test, no water-soluble alkali metal or ammonium compound was added to the slurry while in the other test sodium ~ulfate in an amount equivalent to anhydrous sodium sulfate of 14.3 kilograms per metric ton of ore was added to the fourth autoclave in the train. During the tests samples of the leach liquor in the fourth and fifth autoclave were taken and analyzed for their aluminum content, aluminum being the mo3t significant factor in causing ~caling.
The results are shown in the following Table I. When the test runs were completed, the autoclavès were opened and the scale buildup measured. From the thickness ~i~3~
of the scale buildup and the length of the test runs scaling rates, which are reported in the following Table I, were calculated.
TABLE I
5 Test Fourth Vessel Fifth Ves6el Scaling Al, Scaling Al, Rate, in~mo gpl Rate, in~mo gpl No Na2S04 Addition 0.07 0.5 0.03 0.4 14.3KgNa S0 per 0.00 <0.1 0.00 <0.1 metric ~on40f ore The results shown in Table I confirm that the addition of alkali metal or ammonium compounds lower the aluminum conten~ of the solution dramatically and reduce the scaling.
.
'. ~ ~ , . : ' ' .: .
~. ~
limonitic fractionO Acid additions are keyed to the nature of the ore being treated. Sulfuric acid is added in amounts between about 0.15 part and about 0.3 parts for each part of dry ore and between about 0.45 part and about 0.8 part for each part of dry ore for limonitic and silicate ores, respecti~ely, and for ores that are blends of limonites and sillcates the acid additions are adjusted in accordance with the relative proportions of limonites and sllicates in the particular blend. For most oxi~e ores which are a blend of limonites and silicates, acid additions in amounts between about 0.1 part and about 0.4 part per part of dry ore are generally sufficient. The autoclave is maintained at a temperature between about 230C. and about 300C. to leach about at least 90% of nickel contained in the feed material. Advantageously, the process i~ conducted on a continuous basis by employing a train of autoclaves and feeding the preheated slurry to the first autoclave and transferring slurry from one autoclave to another by gravity or by employing a single ~utoclave having a series of baffles that permit contlnuous operation.
~gain, the requisite amount of acld is added to the autoclave to insure that at least about 90% of the nickel is extracted from the ore.
The sulfuric acid can be added to the preheated slurry either as a single additlon or incrementally to the autoclave or autoclaves to maintain the aluminum content of the aqueous solution at a value of less than 3 grams per liter. When using incremental additions, between 5% and 75%, preferably between 40% and 70%, of the total acid is initially added to the autoclave or the first autoclave in a train and the remainder of acid is then added in at least two equal stages or in substantially equal amounts to each of the autoclaves in the train.
When the leaching reactions are completed, the reacted slurry can be cooled to below its boiling point, let down to atmospheric pressure and then neutralized with fresh ore, such as a high magnesia nickeliferous oxide, or other suitable neutralizing reagent.
.. , . . , , :
.
3~
~, ~
~ 4--Advantageously, the reacted slurry is first neutralized with fresh ore before being cooled to below its boillng point in atmospheric pre~sure in order to improve the kinetics of the neutralizing reactions at the elevated S temperatures. The neutralized slurry is then sub-jected to conventional liquid-solid separation tech-niques to provide a pregnant ~olution containing nickel and any cobalt and a spent residue that i~ sent to waste.
An important feature of the present invention is the addition of a water-soluble alkali metal or ammonium compound to the slurry to accomplish any one or all of the following advantages: improvement of the handling characteristics of the slurry, improved nickel recoveries, decreased scaling rates, increased settling rates or increased compaction of the solids upon liquid-solid separatlon. The water-soluble alkali metals or ammonium compound has its greatest effect on silicate ores and while there is less L~prove~ent in these propertles when treating limonitic ores, the improvement is still significant. Depending upon the objectives to be achieved by the addition of the alkali metal or ammonium compounds, the addition can be made to the slurry immediately prior to that stage of the process where the particular ob~ective is to be realized. Because the alkali metal and ammonium cations react with solubilized iron and aluminum to ~orm hlghly insoluble ~pecies of ~arosites and alun~tes whlch con-sume the cations, it is advantageous to add the c~mpounds when leaching is more than half complete. Of course, if the compound is added to improve the handling characteristics, the compound is added as the ore is being pulped with water. Additional quantities of the alkali metal compounds can be added during the leaching stage as well.
The nature of the ore as well as the ob~ective to be achieved by the addition of the water-soluble alkali metal or ammonium compound will determine the amount of the compound added to the slurry. For example, if it is desired to improve the handling characteristics, i.e.
' ' . :
-- ~ ilO3~
lowering the viscosity of the slurry of a given ore, in-creasing amounts of the alkali or ammonium metal com-pound are added to the slurry un~il no further lowering of the viscosity is observed. From an operational standpoint, it is rarely necessary tc use amounts of the alkali metal or ammonium compound in excess of amounts equivalent to an anhydrous sodium sulfate addition of about 5%, based on the dry weight of the ore. All of the advantages can usually be achieved for most ores when the alkali metal or ammonium compound is added to the slurry in amounts equivalent to anhydrous sodium sulfate additions between about 0.5% and about 2.5%, based on the dry weight of the ore, and advantageously in amounts between about 1.5% and about 2.5%.
Any water-soluble compound of an alkali metal or ammonium can be used for treating the slurry.
Examples of such water-soluble compounds include sodium sulphate, sodium chloride, sodium nitrate, sodium bi-sulphate, sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, sodium 20 bicarbonate, sodium phosphate, sodium silicate, ammonium sulphate, ammonium chloride, ammonium nitrate, ammonium bisulphate, ammonium hydroxide, ammonium phosphate, potassium sulphate, potassium chloride, potassium nitrate, potassium phosphate, potassium silicate and 25 potassium bisulphate. Compounds of other alkali metals are equally e~fective, but because o~ their cost it is preferred to employ the more common alkali metal com-pounds. From the standpoint of cost and avallability, sodium sulphate i~ the pre~erred compound.
In order to give those skilled in the art a better understanding o~ the present invention, the following illustrative examples are given:
A garnieritic ore containing 3.1% nickel was 35 pulped with water to provide a slurry containing 35~
solids. The slurry was preheated to 270C. and sulfuric acid in an amount of 0069 part for each part of the dry ore was incrementally added to the preheated slurry as the slu ~ was oonveyed by gravity through a series of three auto-.: ~
-6~ ~ 10 ~
claves which were maintalned at 270Cr A solution of sodium sulfate in an amount equivalent to 78 pounds of anhydrous sodium sulfate per ton of ore was added to the slurry midway thrGugh the traln of autoclaves. Upon flashing and subsequent liquid-solid separation in a counter-current decantation system, the first thickener provided an underflow residue containing 34% solids.
Analysis showed that 94.5~ of the nickel contained in the ore had been extracted.
A similar test was conducted for comparative purposes without a sodium sulfate addition. In this test, the underflow contained only 22% solids and the nickel extraction was on~y 92~5%. Thus, the sodium sulfate addition lowered the residual nickel in the leach residue by 27% and increased solids content in the underflow by 54.4%.
EXAMPLE II
. __ A nickeliferous oxide ore containing equal fractions of garnierite and limonite and having an overall nickel content of 2.1% was treated in the same manner as deYcribed in Example I except that a lower acid addition of 0.46 part per part of dry ore was employed because of the hlgher iron content of the overall ore and the sodium sulfate addition was equi-valent to an anhydrous sodium sulfate addition of 24pounds per ton of dry oreO The underflow ~rom the first thickener from the counter-current decantation circuit contained 51~ solids, when 0.42 pounds of a poly-acrylamide based flocculant was used per ton of solids in the residue, and analyses show that 96.8% of the nickel had been extractedc A comparative test without the sodium sulfate addition provided a nickel extraction of 94.2% and an underflow residue containing 41% solids with 1.23 pounds of flocculant. Thus, the sodium sulfate additions lowered the nickel content in the resldue by 45%, in-creased the ~olids content of the underflow by 25% and reduced the flocculant consumption by 65%.
EXAMPLE II~
A nickeliferous oxide ore having a nickel content .
.. : - .
.
..
:
.
_ ~ 1~
of 1.8~ was slurried with water to provide a slurry containing 45% solids. Sodium sulfate in an amount equivalent to 50 part of anhydrous sodium sulfate per ton of dry ore was added to the slurry.
The ore was preheated to 270C. and then fed to a train of gravity fed autoclaves maintained at 270C. Sulfuric acid was incrementally fed to the slurry as the slurry progressed from one autoclave to another in a total amount of 0.26 part for each part of ore.
Upon leaving the final autoclave the slurry was flashed and cooled to ambient temperatures. Liquid-solids separation produced an underflow re~idue containing 57% solids, and analyses showed that about 95.2% of the nickel contained in the ore had been extracted.
A comparative test without the sodium sulfate addition was run. The underflow from liquid-solid~
separation had a solids content of 47% and analyses ~howed that nickel extractions were only 94.1%.
EXAMPLE IV
This example coneirms that the addition of water-soluble alkali metal or ammonium compounds to the slurry i9 effective ln lowering the scaling rates generally encountered in the high temperature leaching of these ore~.
A nickel~fer~us oxide was slurried wlth water, preheated to 270C. and fed through a train of S auto-claves into the first three of which sulfurlc acid was incrementally added. In one test, no water-soluble alkali metal or ammonium compound was added to the slurry while in the other test sodium ~ulfate in an amount equivalent to anhydrous sodium sulfate of 14.3 kilograms per metric ton of ore was added to the fourth autoclave in the train. During the tests samples of the leach liquor in the fourth and fifth autoclave were taken and analyzed for their aluminum content, aluminum being the mo3t significant factor in causing ~caling.
The results are shown in the following Table I. When the test runs were completed, the autoclavès were opened and the scale buildup measured. From the thickness ~i~3~
of the scale buildup and the length of the test runs scaling rates, which are reported in the following Table I, were calculated.
TABLE I
5 Test Fourth Vessel Fifth Ves6el Scaling Al, Scaling Al, Rate, in~mo gpl Rate, in~mo gpl No Na2S04 Addition 0.07 0.5 0.03 0.4 14.3KgNa S0 per 0.00 <0.1 0.00 <0.1 metric ~on40f ore The results shown in Table I confirm that the addition of alkali metal or ammonium compounds lower the aluminum conten~ of the solution dramatically and reduce the scaling.
.
'. ~ ~ , . : ' ' .: .
Claims (13)
1. In a process for recovering nickel from nickeli-ferous oxide ores containing less than about 35% iron in which the ore is slurried with water, the slurry is pre-heated to a leaching temperature between about 230°C. and about 300°C., sulfuric acid in an amount between about 0.15 part and about 0.8 part for each part of dry ore is added to the preheated slurry to leach the nickel values from the nickeliferous oxide ores, the leached slurry is neutralized and the neutralized slurry is subjected to a liquids-solids separation operation, the improvement which comprises: adding at least one water-soluble com-pound selected from the group consisting of alkali metal or ammonium compounds to the slurry when the leaching re-actions are more than half complete in small but effective amounts to minimize dissolution of silica, whereby the set-tling rate of the neutralized slurry is improved.
2. The process as described in claim 1, wherein a high magnesia nickeliferous oxide ore is added to the slurry at the leaching temperature after the leaching reactions are complete to neutralize most of the free acid contained in the leach liquor and to recover a substantial portion of the nickel contained in the high magnesia containing ore.
3. The process as described in claim 1, wherein the leached slurry is cooled and let down to atmospheric pressure and neutralized with fresh high magnesia nickeli-ferous oxide ore and the residue from neutralization is fed to the leach slurry at the leaching temperature after the leaching reactions are completed.
4. The process as described in claim 1, wherein the amount of water-soluble compound added to the slurry is up to about 5%, based on the dry weight of the ore.
5. The process as described in claim 4, wherein the water-soluble compound is added in amounts between about 0.5% and about 2.5%, based on the dry weight of the ore.
6. The process as described in claim 5, wherein the water-soluble compound is added in amounts between about 1.5% and about 2.5%, based on the dry weight of the ore.
7. The process as described in claim 6, wherein the water-soluble compound is at least one member selected from a group consisting of sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, sodium nitrate, sodium bisulfate, sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium phosphate, sodium silicate, ammonium sulfate, ammonium chloride, ammonium nitrate, ammonium bisulfate, ammonium hydroxide, ammonium phosphate, potassium sulfate, potassium chloride, potas-sium nitrate, potassium phosphate, potassium silicate and potassium bisulfate.
8. The process as described in claim 7, wherein the water-soluble compound is sodium sulfate.
9. In a process for recovering nickel from nickeli-ferous oxide ores containing about 37.1% iron in which the ore is slurried with water, the slurry is preheated to leaching temperature between about 230°C. and about 300°C., sulfuric acid in an amount between about 0.15 part and about 0.8 part for each part of dry ore is incrementally added to the preheated slurry to maintain the aluminum content of the slurry at a value of less than about 3 grams per liter to leach the nickel values from the nickeliferous oxide ores, the leached slurry is neutralized and the neutralized slurry is subjected to liquid-solids separation, the improvement which comprises: adding at least one water-soluble compound selected from the group consisting of alkali metal or am-monium compounds to the slurry when the leaching reactions are more than 50% complete in small but effective amounts to minimize dissolution of silica whereby the settling rates of the neutralized slurry is improved.
10. In a process for recovering nickel from nickeli-ferous oxide ores containing less than about 35% iron in which the ore is slurried with water, the slurry is preheated to leaching temperature between about 230°C. and about 300°C., sulfuric acid in an amount between about 0.15 part and about 0.8 part for each part of dry ore is added to the preheated slurry to leach the nickel values from the nickeli-ferous oxide ores, the leached slurry is neutralized and the neutralized slurry is subjected to a liquid-solid separation operation, the improvement which comprises: adding at least one water-soluble compound selected from the group consisting of alkali metal or ammonium compounds to the slurry when the leaching reactions are more than about 50% complete in small but effective amounts to minimized dissolution of silica whereby the settling rates of the neutralized slurry is improved.
11. The process as described in claims 9 or 10, where-in the amount of water-soluble compound added to the slurry is up to about 5%, based on the dry weight of the ore.
12. The process as described in claim 9 or 10, where-in the water-soluble compound is added in amounts between about 0.5% and about 2.5% based on the dry weight of the slurry.
13. The process as described in claims 9 or 10, where-in the water-soluble slurry compound is sodium sulfate.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US82062477A | 1977-08-01 | 1977-08-01 | |
| US820,624 | 1986-01-21 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1103040A true CA1103040A (en) | 1981-06-16 |
Family
ID=25231321
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA308,444A Expired CA1103040A (en) | 1977-08-01 | 1978-07-31 | Leaching of nickeliferous oxide ores |
Country Status (7)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS5452615A (en) |
| AU (1) | AU522966B2 (en) |
| BR (1) | BR7804871A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1103040A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE2833039A1 (en) |
| FR (1) | FR2399483A1 (en) |
| GB (1) | GB2001612B (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2007095866A1 (en) * | 2006-02-24 | 2007-08-30 | Centro De Investigaciones Y Proyecto Para La Industria Minero Metalurgica (Cipimm) | Method for increasing the percentage of argillaceous and limonitic mineral solids in pulp supplied to autoclaves in pressurised acid leaching |
| CU23353A1 (en) * | 2006-08-07 | 2009-03-16 | Ct De Investigaciones Y Proyectos Para La Ind ... | PROCEDURE FOR THE TREATMENT OF WATER PULPES OF SIDE MINERALS IN PRESSURE ACID TECHNOLOGY |
| WO2010143067A1 (en) | 2009-06-12 | 2010-12-16 | Mars, Incorporated | Chocolate compositions containing ethylcellulose |
| CN114015872B (en) * | 2022-01-06 | 2022-04-01 | 矿冶科技集团有限公司 | Method for low-temperature activation and pressure leaching of complex nickel sulfide ore |
| JP7273269B1 (en) * | 2022-07-28 | 2023-05-15 | 住友金属鉱山株式会社 | Hydrometallurgical method for nickel oxide ore |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2778729A (en) * | 1954-08-16 | 1957-01-22 | Chemical Construction Corp | Recovery of nickel and cobalt values from garnierite ores |
| US3804613A (en) * | 1971-09-16 | 1974-04-16 | American Metal Climax Inc | Ore conditioning process for the efficient recovery of nickel from relatively high magnesium containing oxidic nickel ores |
| US3793430A (en) * | 1973-05-31 | 1974-02-19 | D Weston | Hydrometallurgical treatment of nickel,cobalt and copper containing materials |
| CA1046289A (en) * | 1975-05-21 | 1979-01-16 | Sjaak J. Van Der Meulen | Hydrometallurgical treatment of nickel and copper bearing intermediates |
-
1978
- 1978-07-18 GB GB7830228A patent/GB2001612B/en not_active Expired
- 1978-07-20 AU AU38192/78A patent/AU522966B2/en not_active Expired
- 1978-07-25 DE DE19782833039 patent/DE2833039A1/en not_active Ceased
- 1978-07-28 BR BR7804871A patent/BR7804871A/en unknown
- 1978-07-31 JP JP9353878A patent/JPS5452615A/en active Granted
- 1978-07-31 CA CA308,444A patent/CA1103040A/en not_active Expired
- 1978-08-01 FR FR7822748A patent/FR2399483A1/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS5452615A (en) | 1979-04-25 |
| FR2399483A1 (en) | 1979-03-02 |
| AU3819278A (en) | 1980-01-24 |
| JPS6353250B2 (en) | 1988-10-21 |
| FR2399483B1 (en) | 1985-01-11 |
| GB2001612A (en) | 1979-02-07 |
| AU522966B2 (en) | 1982-07-08 |
| GB2001612B (en) | 1982-05-26 |
| BR7804871A (en) | 1979-04-10 |
| DE2833039A1 (en) | 1979-02-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4410498A (en) | Acid leaching of nickel from serpentinic laterite ores | |
| US6391089B1 (en) | Acid leaching of nickel laterite ores for the extraction of their nickel and cobalt values | |
| EP1337677B1 (en) | Direct atmospheric leaching of highly-serpentinized saprolitic nickel laterite ores with sulphuric acid | |
| CA1103039A (en) | Leaching of nickeliferous oxide ores containing iron and/or aluminum | |
| EP1778883A1 (en) | Method for nickel and cobalt recovery from laterite ores by combination of atmospheric and moderate pressure leaching | |
| US4150976A (en) | Method for the recovery of metallic copper | |
| US3929468A (en) | Process for recovery of non-ferrous metals from oxide ores and concentrates | |
| AU2001278015B2 (en) | Processing elemental sulfur-bearing materials using high temperature pressure leaching for sulfuric acid production and metal recovery | |
| CA2363969C (en) | Process for the recovery of residual metal values from smelter waste slags, and from converter slags | |
| US3992270A (en) | Method of reclaiming nickel values from a nickeliferous alloy | |
| US4195065A (en) | Leaching nickeliferous oxide ores | |
| NO135290B (en) | ||
| EP0148890A1 (en) | Metal sulphide extraction | |
| CA1103040A (en) | Leaching of nickeliferous oxide ores | |
| US3886257A (en) | Sulfate leaching of copper ores using silver catalyst | |
| Cole et al. | Solvent extraction developments in Southern Africa | |
| US4138465A (en) | Selective recovery of nickel, cobalt, manganese from sea nodules with sulfurous acid | |
| CN103374656A (en) | Technique for recycling nickel, ferrum and cobalt from nickel oxide ore | |
| US3954448A (en) | Process for recovering cobalt, copper, iron, nickel and arsenic | |
| CN114015871B (en) | Method for leaching nickel sulfide concentrate under mild pressure selectively | |
| US3640706A (en) | Method for recovering substantially pure nickel from ammoniacal nickel ammonium carbonate leach solutions | |
| Siemens et al. | Recovery of Nickel and Cobalt From Low-Grade Domestic Laterites | |
| US4030917A (en) | Hydrometallurgical processing of metal sulfides | |
| NO133812B (en) | ||
| US3957485A (en) | Reduction smelting of manganese nodules with a liquid reductant |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |