AU2010251701A1 - Water analysis - Google Patents
Water analysis Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU2010251701A1 AU2010251701A1 AU2010251701A AU2010251701A AU2010251701A1 AU 2010251701 A1 AU2010251701 A1 AU 2010251701A1 AU 2010251701 A AU2010251701 A AU 2010251701A AU 2010251701 A AU2010251701 A AU 2010251701A AU 2010251701 A1 AU2010251701 A1 AU 2010251701A1
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- tio
- noble metal
- chloride
- cod
- sensor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000004457 water analysis Methods 0.000 title description 2
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M Chloride anion Chemical compound [Cl-] VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims abstract description 61
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 51
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titan oxide Chemical compound O=[Ti]=O GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- KDLHZDBZIXYQEI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Palladium Chemical compound [Pd] KDLHZDBZIXYQEI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 229910000510 noble metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 239000004332 silver Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 229910052709 silver Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 239000004408 titanium dioxide Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 150000004706 metal oxides Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 229910052763 palladium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 229910010413 TiO 2 Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 118
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000002256 photodeposition Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- CPELXLSAUQHCOX-UHFFFAOYSA-M Bromide Chemical compound [Br-] CPELXLSAUQHCOX-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 3
- KRHYYFGTRYWZRS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Fluoride anion Chemical compound [F-] KRHYYFGTRYWZRS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- XMBWDFGMSWQBCA-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydrogen iodide Chemical compound I XMBWDFGMSWQBCA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- HBEQXAKJSGXAIQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N oxopalladium Chemical group [Pd]=O HBEQXAKJSGXAIQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000002207 thermal evaporation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000002736 metal compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims 2
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 claims 2
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 abstract description 5
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 18
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 18
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 17
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 17
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 13
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 12
- 150000002894 organic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 11
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 9
- BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N platinum Substances [Pt] BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000000460 chlorine Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 8
- SOCTUWSJJQCPFX-UHFFFAOYSA-N dichromate(2-) Chemical compound [O-][Cr](=O)(=O)O[Cr]([O-])(=O)=O SOCTUWSJJQCPFX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 235000010215 titanium dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 8
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 239000002351 wastewater Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000002105 nanoparticle Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000005316 response function Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000013535 sea water Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 5
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 5
- 239000010931 gold Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 5
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-M Bicarbonate Chemical compound OC([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 229910052753 mercury Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000011368 organic material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 4
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 4
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000009281 ultraviolet germicidal irradiation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 101710134784 Agnoprotein Proteins 0.000 description 3
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910021607 Silver chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 230000003197 catalytic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000084 colloidal system Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229940077449 dichromate ion Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N mercury Chemical compound [Hg] QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001699 photocatalysis Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 3
- HKZLPVFGJNLROG-UHFFFAOYSA-M silver monochloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Ag+] HKZLPVFGJNLROG-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 3
- 239000012086 standard solution Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- MYMOFIZGZYHOMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dioxygen Chemical compound O=O MYMOFIZGZYHOMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 150000001450 anions Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- RCTYPNKXASFOBE-UHFFFAOYSA-M chloromercury Chemical compound [Hg]Cl RCTYPNKXASFOBE-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N gold Chemical compound [Au] PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- -1 halide ions Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 125000005843 halogen group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002923 metal particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000005416 organic matter Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007800 oxidant agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000012898 sample dilution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007858 starting material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004448 titration Methods 0.000 description 2
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Carbonate Chemical compound [O-]C([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- ZAMOUSCENKQFHK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chlorine atom Chemical compound [Cl] ZAMOUSCENKQFHK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- FBPFZTCFMRRESA-FSIIMWSLSA-N D-Glucitol Natural products OC[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)CO FBPFZTCFMRRESA-FSIIMWSLSA-N 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silver Chemical compound [Ag] BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000005864 Sulphur Substances 0.000 description 1
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- NEIHULKJZQTQKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N [Cu].[Ag] Chemical compound [Cu].[Ag] NEIHULKJZQTQKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000003570 air Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012080 ambient air Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004082 amperometric method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000845 anti-microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004599 antimicrobial Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000004429 atom Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000006065 biodegradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000033558 biomineral tissue development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000003842 bromide salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000006758 bulk electrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001354 calcination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013626 chemical specie Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003841 chloride salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052801 chlorine Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000001805 chlorine compounds Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 125000001309 chloro group Chemical group Cl* 0.000 description 1
- 239000000498 cooling water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003869 coulometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012470 diluted sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001882 dioxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000003618 dip coating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010840 domestic wastewater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002848 electrochemical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008151 electrolyte solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000004820 halides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052736 halogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000002367 halogens Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- IXCSERBJSXMMFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N hcl hcl Chemical compound Cl.Cl IXCSERBJSXMMFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 125000004435 hydrogen atom Chemical class [H]* 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010842 industrial wastewater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000004694 iodide salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000006101 laboratory sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000031700 light absorption Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005007 materials handling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960002523 mercuric chloride Drugs 0.000 description 1
- LWJROJCJINYWOX-UHFFFAOYSA-L mercury dichloride Chemical compound Cl[Hg]Cl LWJROJCJINYWOX-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 239000002082 metal nanoparticle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000116 mitigating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 231100000252 nontoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000003000 nontoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000033116 oxidation-reduction process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002940 palladium Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910003445 palladium oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- JRKICGRDRMAZLK-UHFFFAOYSA-L persulfate group Chemical group S(=O)(=O)([O-])OOS(=O)(=O)[O-] JRKICGRDRMAZLK-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 235000021317 phosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000003013 phosphoric acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 125000004437 phosphorous atom Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000007539 photo-oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007540 photo-reduction reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011941 photocatalyst Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003918 potentiometric titration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001376 precipitating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012087 reference standard solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003378 silver Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910001923 silver oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- OGFYIDCVDSATDC-UHFFFAOYSA-N silver silver Chemical compound [Ag].[Ag] OGFYIDCVDSATDC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000600 sorbitol Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001179 sorption measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002798 spectrophotometry method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003467 sulfuric acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000011071 total organic carbon measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010891 toxic waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052720 vanadium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
- G01N27/26—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating electrochemical variables; by using electrolysis or electrophoresis
- G01N27/28—Electrolytic cell components
- G01N27/30—Electrodes, e.g. test electrodes; Half-cells
- G01N27/305—Electrodes, e.g. test electrodes; Half-cells optically transparent or photoresponsive electrodes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/18—Water
- G01N33/1806—Biological oxygen demand [BOD] or chemical oxygen demand [COD]
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
- Emergency Medicine (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Non-Biological Materials By The Use Of Chemical Means (AREA)
Abstract
A method of determining chemical oxygen demand in saline water samples containing chloride ions by a photoelectrochemical method in which the photo electrode is a titanium dioxide sensor treated by deposition of a noble metal oxide preferably silver(l) oxide or palladium, (II) oxide.
Description
WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 1 WATER ANALYSIS Field of the Invention This invention relates to a method for determining oxygen demand of water using photoelectrochemical cells. In particular, the invention relates to a 5 photoelectrochemical method of determining chemical oxygen demand of water samples having high chloride content such as sea water. Background to the Invention Nearly all domestic and industrial wastewater effluents contain organic 10 compounds, which can cause detrimental oxygen depletion (or demand) in waterways into which the effluents are released. This demand is due largely to the oxidative biodegradation of organic compounds by naturally occurring microorganisms, which utilize the organic material as a food source. In this process, organic carbon is oxidised to carbon dioxide, while oxygen is consumed 15 and reduced to water. Standard analytical methodologies for the determination of aggregate properties such as oxygen demand in water are biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD). BOD involves the use of heterotrophic microorganisms to oxidise organic material and thus estimate 20 oxygen demand. COD uses strong chemical oxidising agents, such as dichromate or permanganate, to oxidise organic material. BOD analysis is carried out over five days and oxygen demand determined by titration or with an oxygen probe. COD measures dichromate or permanganate depletion by titration or spectrophotometry. 25 Application W02004/088305 discloses a photoelectrochemical method of detecting chemical oxygen demand as a measure of water quality using a titanium dioxide nanoparticulate semiconductor electrode. Titanium(IV) oxide (TiO 2 ) has been extensively used in photooxidation of organic compounds. TiO 2 is non photocorrosive, non-toxic, inexpensive, relatively easily synthesised in its highly 30 active catalytic nanoparticulate form, and is highly efficient in photooxidative degradation of organic compounds. This method is satisfactory for the analysis of water and wastewater samples which contain very low levels of the chloride ion C (say, [Cl] < -20 mg/L). When the chloride ion concentration in the sample to WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 2 be analysed exceeds this level the COD measurement may suffer increased uncertainty due to interference of the chloride ion in the electrochemical measurement process. A problem encountered in conducting assays using this method is dealing 5 with interference from competing oxidisable chemical species other than organic carbon. Filtration of samples reduces interference from many species but the presence of chloride still remains a significant interference that must be dealt with. The conventional dichromate COD detection method deals with chloride interference by chemically removing the chloride ions. The principle is to add a 10 chemical that can form compounds with C that are not oxidised by the dichromate ion, as exemplified by the following reactions Hg 2 + (aq) + 2 C(atq -- HgC 2 (aq)s Ag*(ad + CF(aq) - AgCI4(so,d), 15 Addition of Ag* as the ionic salt Ag 2
SO
4 , removes C ion from solution by precipitating out as AgCl(s). This is not oxidised to a large extent by the dichromate ion (Cr 2 0 7 2 -). Addition of Hg 2 + as the ionic salt HgSO 4 , to a solution containing Cr, results in the formation of mercuric chloride (HgC 2 ). HgCl 2 is not an ionic salt but rather is a triatomic molecule. When dissolved in water, the Cl atoms remain 20 complexed to the Hg atom. The HgC 2 molecule in solution is resistant to oxidation by the dichromate ion (Cr 2 0 7 2 -). Because of its high degree of solubility in water HgCl 2 is one of the most toxic forms of mercury known, and therefore presents a considerable toxic waste disposal problem. The conventional dichromate COD method involves the use of expensive and toxic 25 chemicals requiring careful disposal. For online applications, the system will need a sophisticated component to achieve in situ separation of precipitated AgCI, which, on one hand will significantly undermine the accuracy and reliability of the system, and on the other hand will increase both the capital and operational costs. For both Industry and environmental management, there is considerable need to 30 be able to measure the levels of organic content (or contamination) in water containing low to high levels of chloride (e.g. in sea water). Chloride is a problem for organic content measurement in aqueous samples as current methods of analysis can't easily distinguish between organic and chloride content, without WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 3 resorting to the use of toxic mercury. Historically, the US EPA has approved a particular method of dichromate digestion for COD measurement. The EPA approved method requires the addition of mercury and silver salts to mask the chloride interference prior to analysis. Often 5 this is accompanied by sample dilution in order to fully prevent unwanted oxidation of the chloride ions and to provide a solution capable of being analysed spectrophotometrically or by potentiometric titration. Thus low level organic content is not easily measured with any accuracy. This method also produces toxic salts that require specific materials handling procedures for disposal. 10 Another established method for quantifying organic contamination of water is total organic carbon (TOC) measurement. Difficulties in the presence of chloride also exist for TOC in that for persulphate based oxidation, false positives arise due to the inability to distinguish between chloride ions and the organic compounds in the solution. For high temperature oxidation based TOC, the chloride salts calcine and 15 can cause instrumental errors through degraded operating performance, thus leading to high maintenance requirements for the technique and an inability to conduct regular on-line measurements. W02007/016740 discloses an improvement in the photoelectrochemical method of detecting chemical oxygen described in W02004/088305 which deals with the 20 interference by chlorine. In water samples containing chloride ions above 0.5mM concentration in which the samples are diluted and a known quantity of an organic substance is added to the diluted sample which is then subjected to an assay by a photoelectrochemical method using a titanium dioxide photoactive nanoparticulate semiconductor electrode and the chemical oxygen demand is measured in the 25 same manner as disclosed in W02004/088305, except that a known concentration organic solution is used to obtain the blank for calculation of net charge Qnet . With this organic addition method, the analytical signal is generated in exactly the same way as the photoelectrochemical method disclosed in W02004/088305. However, this addition method requires some sort of prior knowledge of the range 30 of chloride concentration and organic contents in the samples in order to determine how much organic material to add to ensure total suppression of the chloride interference, and thus an accurate COD measurement. In many cases, this is not a serious issue, however in environments such as sea water where the chloride WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 4 content is high, high levels of organic addition and sample dilution are then required and this has an impact on the sensitivity achievable. Patent application W02009/049366 discloses an enhancement of the method disclosed in W02004/088305 which successfully overcomes the problem 5 presented by chloride ion interference. That enhancement was to irradiate the TiO 2 sensor surface with pulsed-UV radiation rather than with continuous-UV radiation, as is done in the method of W02004/088305. The pulsed-UV method facilitates the measurement of COD in water and wastewater samples with chloride concentrations ranging up to at least that found in natural seawater, (i.e., 10 [Cl~] = 21,000 mg/L). One disadvantage of the pulsed-UV method is that the time required for an analysis in this mode is considerably longer (say, by a factor of approximately three) than is required for the normal continuous-UV method used for chloride-free samples. There is a significant body of literature in both the scientific and patent domains, 15 concerning the deposition onto TiO 2 nanoparticles of noble metal nanoparticles in their zero (i.e., metallic) oxidation state (e.g., Ag*, Pt*, Pd 0 and Au*) or in higher oxidation states (e.g. Ag+ 1 , Pt+ 2 and Pt* 4 , Pd+ 2 and Au+'). Such treatment of TiO 2 has frequently been observed to increase the efficiency of (both the rate of and the completeness of) its oxidation of organics in bulk water or wastewater, relative to 20 the efficiency observed when using non-treated TiO 2 . USA patent 5872072 discloses a catalytic composition useful for decomposing malodorous compounds which includes titanium dioxide and an antimicrobial metal selected from silver copper and zinc. However, the literature is silent on modifications to TiO 2 which modify its photoelectrochemical behaviour with respect to the chloride ion. 25 It is an object of this invention to provide a simpler means of dealing with chloride interference than those currently known. Brief Description of the Invention To this end the present invention provides a method of determining chemical 30 oxygen demand in water samples containing chloride ions by a photoelectrochemical method in which the photo electrode is a titanium dioxide sensor treated with a noble metal compound. The noble metal is selected from the group of gold, palladium, platinum and WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 5 preferably silver. After treatment the titanium dioxide sensor surface includes an oxide of the noble metal and this is preferably a silver or palladium oxide. The Ag 2 0:TiO 2 and the PdO:TiO 2 density ratio of the resulting A920-TiO 2 or PdO TiO 2 composite material is preferably controlled by manipulating the deposition 5 parameters within the range of 0.01 to 0.4 preferably 0.05 to 0.15. This invention is partly predicated on the discovery that interference of chloride ions in the method disclosed in W02004/088305 (referred to as PeCOD* analysis) for measuring COD in water and wastewater manifests in at least two distinct ways, which are (a) signal suppression; and (b) signal tailing. These terms both 10 refer to ways in which the oxidation profile measured electrochemically at the nanoparticulate-TiO2 working electrode, (i.e., the /wo vs. time signal recorded by the instrument) is distorted, so as to yield an error in the calculation of COD from this profile. This invention is also predicated on the discovery that a TiO 2 sensor which has 15 been treated by the deposition of silver(l) oxide (Ag 2 0), will be far less sensitive to the presence of chloride ions in the water sample than a TiO 2 sensor which has not undergone such treatment with Ag 2 0. Using such an Ag 2 0-deposited TiO 2 sensor facilitates the rapid analysis of chloride containing samples using continuous (rather than pulsed) UV irradiation. This advantage applies to samples 20 in the PeCOD* measurement cell with chloride ion concentrations ranging up to at least [C]=700 mg/L. This yields a significant saving in time for the analysis of chloride containing samples compared to employing the pulsed-UV method of PCT2008/001529 mentioned above. In addition to this advantageous property, Ag 2 0-treated TiO 2 COD sensors are 25 found to linearise the instrument response function (i.e., measured Qnet vs. sample COD) of the PeCOD* analyser which, with non-Ag 2 0-treated TiO 2 is significantly (and reproducibly so) nonlinear. A linear instrument function facilitates the employment of simpler calibration protocols without risking the introduction of systematic measurement errors due to nonlinearity. 30 A further advantage is that Ag 2 0-treated TiO 2 COD sensors are found to render the PeCOD* analysis method immune to interference from dissolved carbon dioxide in the water sample. In the PeCOD* method dissolved carbon dioxide (C02) in a sample of water or wastewater can yield a spuriously high COD reading WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 6 when using a non-Ag 2 0-treated TiO 2 COD sensor. Although not a very large effect, it can be significant particularly if a small water sample has been left open to the atmosphere for a long time and has been allowed to come to a concentration equilibrium with atmospheric CO 2 . 5 A final advantage is that combining the Ag20-treatment of the TiO 2 sensor with the pulsed-UV approach yields a new pulsed method for analysis of samples containing chloride ranging up to at least [C[~]=21,000 mg/L, which is significantly faster than that disclosed earlier. Upon absorption of light by the TiO 2 photocatalyst, electrons in the valence band 10 are promoted to the conduction band (ecb~) and "photoholes" are left in the valence band (hvb*). The photohole is a very powerful oxidizing agent (+3.1 V) that will readily lead to the seizure of an electron from a species adsorbed to the solid semi-conductor TiO 2 . Thermodynamically, both organic compounds and water can be oxidized by the photoholes or surface trapped photoholes but usually organic 15 compounds are more favourably oxidized, which leads to the mineralization of a wide range of organic compounds. This is described in application W02004/088305 the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Owing to the strong oxidation power of photoholes, photocatalytic oxidation of organic compounds at the TiO 2 electrode leads to stoichiometric oxidation 20 (degradation) of organic compounds as follows: CHm 0,Xk Nj SiPh + b 0 2 -- nCO 2 + m-k-3j-2i-3h H 2 0 + kHX + jNH 3 + iH 2
SO
4 + hH 3
PO
4 where b = n + m-k-3j-2i-3h - + 2i + 2h 4 2 and where X represents a halogen atom. The numbers of carbon, hydrogen, 25 oxygen, halogen, nitrogen, sulphur, and phosphorous atoms in the organic compound are represented by n, m, e, k, j, i and h, respectively. In order to minimize the degradation time and maximize the degradation efficiency, the photoelectrochemical catalytic degradation of organic matter is preferably carried out in a thin layer photoelectrochemical cell. This process is analogous to 30 bulk electrolysis in which all of the analytes are electrolysed and Faraday's Law can be used to quantify the concentration by measuring the charge passed if the charge/current produced is originated from photoelectrochemical degradation of WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 7 organic matter. That is: Q = Jidt =nFVC where n refers to the number of electrons transferred during the photoelectrocatalytic degradation, and i is the photocurrent from the oxidation of 5 organic compounds. F is the Faraday constant, while V and C are the sample volume and the concentration of organic compound respectively. The measured charge, Q, is a direct measure of the total amount of electrons transferred that result from the complete degradation of all compounds in the sample. Since one oxygen molecule is equivalent to 4 electrons transferred, the 10 measured Q value can be easily converted into an equivalent 02 concentration (or oxygen demand). The equivalent COD value can therefore be represented as: COD (mg / L of 0 2 ) = -x 32000 4FV This COD equation can be used to quantify the COD value of a sample since the charge, Q, can be obtained experimentally and for a given photoelectrochemical 15 cell, the volume, V, is a known constant. In another aspect the present invention provides a photoelectrochemical assay apparatus for determining oxygen demand of a water sample which consists of a) a flow through measuring cell; b) a photoactive titanium dioxide working electrode which has been treated 20 by deposition with a noble metal oxide, preferably silver(l) oxide or palladium(ll) oxide and a counter electrode disposed in said cell; c) a UV light source, adapted to illuminate the photoactive working electrode either continuously or in pulses; d) control means to control the illumination of the working electrode, 25 the applied potential and signal measurement e) current measuring means to measure the photocurrent at the working and counter electrodes f) analysis means to derive a measure of oxygen demand from the measurements made by the photocurrent measuring means. 30 Preferably a reference electrode is also located in the measuring cell and the WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 8 working electrode is a nanoparticulate semiconductor electrode preferably titanium dioxide. The flow rate is adjusted to optimise the sensitivity of the measurements. This cell design is based on that disclosed in application W02004/088305 (marketed as PeCOD*) with means to store the organic/electrolyte solution. The 5 sample collection device preferably includes a filter to remove any large particulates or precipitated substances that may interfere with the operation of the cell. The method of this invention is particularly applicable to measurement of COD/organic content in industrial outflows to sea, in power plant cooling water, 10 and shipping waste water. Detailed Description of the Invention Preferred embodiments will be described with reference to the drawings in which: Figure 1 illustrates the effect of Ag 2 0-treatment on TiO 2 sensors, for analysing 15 chloride containing samples; Figures 2 and 3 further illustrate the effect of either Ag 2 0- or PdO-treatment on TiO 2 sensors, for chloride containing samples; Figure 4 illustrates a suite of highly linear calibration functions for chloride containing standard solutions generated for an Ag 2 0-treated-TiO 2 sensor; 20 Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the improved linearity obtained for chloride-free calibration standard solutions when using Ag 2 0-treated-TiO 2 as opposed to untreated TiO 2 . Methods for introducing AgOto the TiO 2 sensor matrix Standard nanoparticulate TiO 2 sensors for PeCOD* analysis were modified by 25 deposition of Ag 2 0 particles onto the TiO 2 . Two simple methods of photodeposition were employed and both gave similarly successful results for the PeCOD* analysis of chloride containing samples. In the first method of Ag 2 0 deposition, a few drops of AgNO 3 solution were added to a NaCl solution, forming a suspension of very fine AgCl particles. Before this 30 white coloured AgCl suspension could agglomerate and precipitate out, a small quantity was placed onto the thin film TiO 2 sensor surface. The surface was then irradiated for a few minutes with UV-radiation (or natural sunlight), causing WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 9 photoreduction of the Ag*' to fine Ago metal particles, which in turn were immediately hydrolysed to Ag 2 0 (Ag ") particles. The Ag 2 0 nanoparticles are deposited onto the TiO 2 surface and become embedded in the porous nanoparticulate TiO 2 matrix. The residual fluid was washed off the now Ag 2 0 5 treated TiO 2 sensor, which could be immediately installed into a PeCOD* instrument for use in analysis. In the second method of Ag 2 0 deposition, a few drops of AgNO 3 solution were added directly to the TiO 2 sensor surface, then the excess fluid sponged off, leaving the TiO 2 thin film matrix moist with AgNO 3 . The sensor was then placed 10 under a UV-lamp (or direct sunlight) for a few minutes, long enough to photoreduce the Ag*' to Ag 0 metal particles, which are in turn hydrolysed to Ag 2 0 nanoparticles distributed evenly through the TiO 2 sensor matrix. As above, once the residual fluid was washed off the Ag 2 0-treated sensor could be installed into a PeCOD* instrument for use in analysis. Sensors prepared using either of these 15 simple methods were used to provide the Ag 2 0/TiO 2 sensor data illustrated in Figures 1-6. It would be convenient if the Ag 2 0 could be introduced to the TiO 2 -water colloid system subsequently used to fabricate the thin layer sensor, rather than onto the already prepared, immobilised TiO 2 thin layer. However, the high temperature 20 (700 0 C) required to immobilise and calcine the TiO 2 colloid to yield the optimal anatase:rutile ratio renders this impossible. Ag 2 0 decomposes into Ago (metal) and oxygen gas at a temperature well below 700*C. The resulting thin film is a mixture of TiO 2 and Ag 0 nanoparticles. Ag metal does not provide the chloride resistance properties in the sensor that Ag 2 0 provides. 25 In Figure 1, the effect of treating a sensor with silver(l) oxide is illustrated over the chloride range 0 < [C-] < 100 mg/L. In Figures 2 and 3, the range of chloride concentrations over which the Ag 2 0/TiO 2 sensor behaviour was tested was increased to the much broader range 0 < [CI] < 4000 mg/L. Figures 2 and 3 differ only in that the x-axis is linear in Figure 2 and is logarithmic in Figure 3. With 30 reference to Figures 2 and 3, a set of reference standard solutions containing a fixed 120 mg/L COD and chloride variously at [C-] = 0, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 and 4000 mg/L was analysed with an Ag 2 0-treated TiO 2 sensor. The chloride-free 120 mg/L COD solution was first used to calibrate the PeCOD* WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 10 instrument. The instrument's COD readings declined with increasing [Cl] at a rate of d[COD]/d[Cr] = -0.031 (mg/L COD)/(mg/L C-). For reference, the corresponding chloride sensitivity gradient (illustrated on Figures 2 and 3 with an unbroken line) observed for a non-Ag 2 0-treated sensor is d[COD]/d[CI-]= -1.23 (mg/L 5 COD)/(mg/L Cr)). From this we conclude that the Ag 2 0-treatment is capable of reducing the sensor's vulnerability to chloride signal suppression interference by a factor of approximately 40. Ag-treatment of TiO 2 shifts onset of chloride tailing interference to much 10 higher FCT When using an untreated TiO 2 sensor we observed that the oxidation profiles are seriously distorted by "tailing" due to chloride interference even at low chloride concentrations, [Cl] < 100 mg/L. However, when using an Ag 2 0-treated TiO 2 sensor this tailing interference effect was not seen until much higher chloride 15 levels, [C-] > 800 mg/L. We conclude that Ag 2 0-treatment of a TiO 2 sensor significantly reduces the sensor's vulnerability to the chloride tailing interference effect. Extensive subsequent testing in the laboratory has confirmed this result. Ag-treatment of TiO 2 linearises the PeCOD* response function 20 For normal PeCOD* analysis of non-chloride-containing solutions using a non Ag 2 0-treated sensor, it has been found that the instrument response function, (i.e., the Qnet vs. COD function) is significantly nonlinear. Although the degree of nonlinearity is not large, it may nevertheless result in systematic COD measurement errors of 5-10 % if a conventional straight-line, 2-point, zero and 25 span calibration protocol is employed. This systematic COD measurement error can be effectively removed by using a more sophisticated 3-5 point calibration protocol; however this introduces a significant degree of inconvenience. It would be better still to remove the nonlinearity at its source, than to work around it using sophisticated calibration protocols and polynomial arithmetic. 30 We have found, rather unexpectedly, that treating the TiO 2 sensors with silver(l) oxide results in a linear PeCOD* instrument response function. This applies to PeCOD* Ag 2 0-treated TiO 2 sensor analysis of both chloride-free and chloride containing samples, up to at least the level [Cl] = 700 mg/L. Figure 4 illustrates a WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 11 suite of highly linear calibration functions generated for an Ag 2 0-treated-TiO 2 sensor. Six sets of reference standard COD/C[ solutions were prepared. Set (a) consisted of solutions containing [COD] = 0, 10, 20, 50 and 75 mg/L COD and a chloride content fixed at [Cr] = 0 mg/L. Similarly, set (b) was the same except its 5 fixed chloride content was [C[] = 50 mg/L; and so on for set (c) [Cr] = 100 mg/L; set (d) [C[] = 300 mg/L; set (e) [Cl] = 400 mg/L; and set (f) [C-] = 500 mg/L. The correlation coefficient, R 2 , yielded for the straight line of best fit for each of the 5 point calibration data sets were (to the fourth decimal place): (a) 1.0000; (b) 0.9997; (c) 0.9996; (d) 0.9995; (e) 0.9996; and (f) 0.9994. 10 In Figure 5 a set of five COD (present as glucose) calibration reference standards at 0, 20, 40, 60 and 75 mg/L were analysed with a TiO 2 sensor (open circles, dotted line) and an Ag 2 0-TiO 2 sensor (filled circles, unbroken line). The normalised (at [COD] = 75 mg/L) instrument response is plotted against [COD]. The correlation coefficients for the straight line of best fit for the TiO 2 and Ag 2 0 15 TiO 2 generated data were R2 = 0.9977 and 0.9997, respectively. Figure 6 illustrates the data yielded where the COD was present as sorbitol. The correlation coefficients for the straight line of best fit for the TiO 2 and Ag 2 0-TiO 2 generated data were R2 = 0.9989 and 1.0000, respectively. Other test compoundsshowed much the same relative behaviour for TiO 2 and Ag 2 0-TiO 2 20 sensors. Ag-treatment of TiO 2 decreases sensor sensitivity to interference from dissolved CO 2 A further advantageous property acquired by the TiO 2 sensors by treating them 25 with Ag 2 0 was that they became drastically less sensitive to interference from presence of dissolved carbon dioxide in the analysed sample. Carbon dioxide
(CO
2 ), an inorganic species, is present in ambient air at a molar mixing ratio of approximately 380 pmol/mol. A water sample held in a container open to the ambient atmosphere will, over hours and days, gradually absorb CO 2 until it 30 reaches an equilibrium with the air CO 2 content. CO 2 dissolved in the water sample will in turn reach an equilibrium within the fluid between the several species CO2(aq), HCO3~(aq) and C03 2 -(aq) depending on the temperature and pH. The bicarbonate (HC03-(aq)) and carbonate (C03 2 -(aq)) ions can be readily oxidised WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 12 at the UV-irradiated TiO 2 surface to give a spurious (because not derived from the oxidation of an organic species) contribution to the Qnet signal collected by the PeCOD* instrument. This is generally not a significant problem if normal laboratory sample handling practices are followed and samples are stored in 5 closed containers when not in use. However, the interference from CO 2 can be a significant source of measurement uncertainty when analysing relatively clean water containing low levels of COD (< 20 mg/L). It has been found that Ag 2 0 treated TiO 2 sensors are quite insensitive to the presence of dissolved CO 2 in water samples, virtually eliminating this as a source of measurement uncertainty. 10 Ag-treatment of TiO 2 decreases the analysis time using pulsed-UV irradiation for highly saline samples It has been demonstrated already that treatment of TiO 2 sensors with Ag 2 0 extends the range of COD analysis in chloride-containing matrices when using 15 continuous UV-irradiation from 0 mg/L < [C-] < 80 mg/L to at least 0 mg/L < [Cl] < 700 mg/L. At chloride concentrations beyond 700 mg/L it may still necessary to use pulsed-UV irradiation to circumvent chloride interference. This allows analysis for COD in water and wastewater samples containing chloride at concentrations of at least 21,000 mg/L (the level typically found in seawater). We have found that 20 the Ag 2 0-treatment of TiO 2 sensors also brings an improvement to this type of analysis. Pulsed-UV analysis proceeds more rapidly, by 20-30 %, when using an Ag 2 0-TiO 2 sensor as opposed to a TiO 2 sensor. This yields a significant time saving for users of this method. 25 Possible mechanism of the advantageous effects arising from Ag 2 0 treatment of the TiO 2 sensor The mitigation of interference effects arising from dissolved C[ and CO 2 on a TiO 2 sensor, by treating it with silver(l) oxide, have not been reported in the scientific literature before and are not well understood. The best we can do at present is 30 speculate on what the mechanisms of these effects may be. It is believed that the photocatalytic oxidative action of TiO 2 occurs predominantly at the solid-liquid interface, i.e., at the TiO 2 surface, through oxidative attack by the photohole (hvab) in the TiO 2 valence band. Species having a propensity to adsorb onto the TiO 2 WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 13 surface are typically oxidised more efficiently than those species that do not adsorb. We suspect that Cr, and dissolved C02 are species that do adsorb to the TiO 2 surface. In doing so they may compete with the organic species in the solution for the photoactive TiO 2 sites where oxidation may occur. This may result 5 in interference with the oxidation of the organics, such as we have observed using untreated TiO 2 sensors. We suspect that deposition of Ag 2 0 particles onto the TiO 2 changes the nature of the TiO 2 surface in such a way that C1, HCO3 and C032- are less prone to- adsorb on this surface, and thereby less able to interfere in the COD measurement using 10 this approach. We suspect that the deposition of Ag 2 0 onto the TiO 2 changes the surface charge of the combined Ag 2 0-TiO 2 surface, making it more negatively charged. Plausibly, the anions in solution perceive the Ag 2 0-TiO 2 surface as being more electron rich than they would a bare TiO 2 surface and are less likely to adsorb to the former because of relatively repulsive electrostatic forces. If Cr, 15 HC03- and C032- anions are significantly less likely to adsorb to a Ag 2 0-treated TiO 2 surface than to a TiO 2 surface, then we can expect the Ag 2 0-TiO 2 sensor to be subject to much less interference from these anions in the process of COD analysis. This is also a plausible explanation for the Ag 2 0-treatment of a TiO 2 sensor 20 linearising the previously nonlinear response function, if we consider that this nonlinearity may be due, indirectly, to HC03- and C032-. Recall that the mineralisation (i.e., exhaustive oxidation) of the organics results in C02 as a major product. This product C02 will to some extent dissolve in the sample and move towards establishing a C02(aq)/HCO3~(aq)/CO3 2 -(aq) equilibrium. This product HC0 3 ~ 25 and C032- may be oxidised again at the TiO 2 surface to give C02, and a spurious contribution to the measured COD. Thus, the higher the concentration of organics initially in the cell, the more likely there is to be established this positive feedback loop based on the C02, HC03- and C032- oxidation-reduction cycle in solution. This will manifest as the sort of concave upward nonlinear response function we 30 observe for bare TiO 2 sensors, as illustrated in Figures 5 and 6. To the extent that Ag 2 0 treatment mitigates against the adsorption of HCO3- and C032- anions on the Ag 2 0-TiO 2 surface, the nonlinearity should diminish.
WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 14 TiO 2 sensor treatment using oxides of metals other than silver Silver is an element belonging to the Group 11 metals of the Periodic Table of Elements. It also belongs to a set of metal elements, the noble metals, from the same part of the Periodic Table, that frequently exhibit similar chemical properties. 5 This group includes another Group 11 element Gold (Au), and the two Group 10 elements Platinum (Pt) and Palladium (Pd). The scientific literature reflects that treatment with these three other metals frequently lends similar properties to nanoparticulate TiO 2 (and other semiconductors) as does treatment with silver. It might reasonably be expected that, analogously, treatment of TiO 2 sensors with 10 the oxides of Au, Pt or Pd may lend similar advantageous properties to TiO 2 sensors as does treatment with Ag 2 0. With this in mind palladium(II) oxide was deposited onto TiO 2 sensors in order to test these sensors for enhanced chloride resistance. With reference to Figures 3 and 4, the chloride resistance of the PdO TiO 2 sensor was characterised in the same way as it was for the Ag 2 0-TiO 2 and 15 untreated TiO 2 sensors, as described above. While the profile of the measured COD vs. [CI] function for the PdO-TiO 2 sensor was quite different from that of Ag 2 0-TiO 2 sensors, it did show very significantly enhanced chloride interference resistance with respect to untreated TiO 2 . Indeed, the PdO-TiO 2 sensor continued to function as a COD sensor at 4000 mg/L chloride, with a much smaller degree of 20 signal suppression than that shown by Ag 2 0-TiO 2 sensors. From this it follows that PdO-TiO 2 sensors will facilitate the analysis of COD in seawater (containing -21,000 mg/L C-), requiring only a relatively modest 5x dilution of the sample prior to PeCOD analysis. Preferably, for such analysis, the instrument would be calibrated with appropriately saline standard solutions rather than chloride-free 25 solutions. Several methods of Pd and PdO deposition are well described in the literature. These include photodeposition approaches with starting materials such as PdNO 3 or other soluble palladium salts. There are also thermal deposition approaches, using similar starting materials. In the present case, an even simpler deposition method was used. Commercially sourced PdO nanoparticles were 30 added to the 5% TiO 2 /water colloid system normally used for thin film TiO 2 sensor fabrication, and well mixed. The mass ratio PdO:TiO 2 in the resulting mixed nanoparticle suspension was approximately 15%. This mixture was used to fabricate slides by the usual dip-coating method followed by calcination at 700 0
C,
WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 15 as disclosed in W02009/062248. Ag-treatment may mitigate against interference from halide ions other than chloride Chloride is an ionic species belonging to the halide group (from Group 17 of the 5 Periodic Table of Elements). The other halide ions Fluoride (F-), Bromide (Br) and Iodide (l-) frequently exhibit very similar chemical properties to those of Chloride. We claim that from this it follows that Ag 2 0-treatment of TiO 2 sensors may mitigate against interference by these other halide ions in the same way it mitigates against interference by chloride. 10 AgO-treatment of TiO 2 sensors used in amperometric measurement of COD While the present application has been described with reference to a previously disclosed coulometric method for measuring COD (WO 2004/088305), the same application also discloses an amperometric COD measurement method. 15 Furthermore, other related applications disclose amperometric methods for COD measurement (W02008/077192, W02008/077191, and AU 2010900885). These methods are also based on the principle of photocatalytic oxidation of organics on a nanoparticulate TiO 2 surface. The advantages of treating the TiO 2 sensor with Ag 2 0 would also apply to these methods. 20 Those skilled in the art will realise that the present invention provides a robust analytical tool that can provide accurate measurement of COD in a short time without interference from competing species such as chloride. It will be evident to those practiced in the art that this novel new method also has 25 potential application for other interfering species, such as other soluble counter ions (including bromides, iodides, sulphates, phosphates etc.) Those skilled in the art will also realise that this invention may be implemented in embodiments other than those described without departing from the core teachings of the invention. 30 PeCOD* is a trademark of Aqua Diagnostic Holdings PTY LTD
Claims (8)
1. A method of determining chemical oxygen demand in water samples containing fluoride, bromide or iodide and/ or chloride ions by a 5 photoelectrochemical method in which the photo electrode is a titanium dioxide sensor which has been treated with a noble metal compound.
2. A method of determining chemical oxygen demand in water samples containing fluoride, bromide or iodide and/ or chloride ions by a 10 photoelectrochemical method in which the photo electrode is a titanium dioxide sensor in which a noble metal oxide is incorporated into the nanoparticulate TiO 2 material matrix by means of photodeposition, thermal deposition or chemical synthesis. 15
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the noble metal is selected from silver or palladium.
4. Water quality assay apparatus for determining oxygen demand of a water sample which consists of 20 a) a flow through measuring cell b) a photoactive titanium dioxide working electrode incorporating a noble metal oxide and a counter electrode disposed in said cell, c) a UV light source, adapted to illuminate the photoactive working electrode either continuously or in pulses 25 d) control means to control the illumination of the working electrode, the applied potential and signal measurement e) current measuring means to measure the photocurrent at the working and counter electrodes f) analysis means to derive a measure of oxygen demand from the 30 measurements made by the photocurrent measuring means. WO 2010/132957 PCT/AU2010/000621 17
5. Water quality assay apparatus as claimed in claim 4 in which a noble metal oxide is incorporated into the nanoparticulate TiO 2 material matrix by means of photodeposition, thermal deposition or chemical synthesis. 5
6. Water quality assay apparatus as claimed in claim 5 in which the noble metal oxide is selected from silver or palladium.
7. Water quality assay apparatus as claimed in claim 6 in which the noble metal oxide is silver(l) oxide and the Ag 2 0:TiO 2 density ratio of the 10 resulting Ag 2 0-TiO 2 composite material is controlled by manipulating the deposition parameters.
8. Water quality assay apparatus as claimed in claim 6 in which the noble metal oxide is palladium(II) oxide and the PdO:TiO 2 density ratio of the 15 resulting PdO-TiO 2 composite material is controlled by manipulating the deposition parameters. 20
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2010251701A AU2010251701B2 (en) | 2009-05-22 | 2010-05-24 | Water analysis |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2009902346 | 2009-05-22 | ||
AU2009902346A AU2009902346A0 (en) | 2009-05-22 | Water analysis | |
PCT/AU2010/000621 WO2010132957A1 (en) | 2009-05-22 | 2010-05-24 | Water analysis |
AU2010251701A AU2010251701B2 (en) | 2009-05-22 | 2010-05-24 | Water analysis |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
AU2010251701A1 true AU2010251701A1 (en) | 2011-12-01 |
AU2010251701B2 AU2010251701B2 (en) | 2012-11-15 |
Family
ID=43125675
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2010251701A Active AU2010251701B2 (en) | 2009-05-22 | 2010-05-24 | Water analysis |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU2010251701B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010132957A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102706946B (en) * | 2011-03-28 | 2014-09-17 | 同济大学 | Method for rapidly determining COD of waste water difficult to be oxidized |
DE102013108556A1 (en) * | 2013-08-08 | 2015-02-12 | Endress + Hauser Conducta Gesellschaft für Mess- und Regeltechnik mbH + Co. KG | Method and analyzer for determining the chemical oxygen demand of a fluid sample |
CN110487864B (en) * | 2019-09-03 | 2020-10-27 | 中南大学 | Photoelectrochemical detection method for chloride ion concentration in water body |
CN112730543B (en) * | 2020-12-09 | 2023-01-17 | 江苏大学 | Construction method of portable potential type photoelectrochemical sensor for rapidly detecting chemical oxygen demand |
CN116990443B (en) * | 2023-09-28 | 2024-02-06 | 山东天信医药科技有限公司 | Accurate detection method for COD in high-chlorine low-COD water sample |
Family Cites Families (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TW365547B (en) * | 1994-12-26 | 1999-08-01 | Takeda Chemical Industries Ltd | Catalytic compositions and a deodorizing method using the same |
US6204428B1 (en) * | 1998-12-08 | 2001-03-20 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Electrochemical membrane incinerator |
WO2000068153A1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2000-11-16 | Japan Science And Technology Corporation | Apparatus for oxidatively destructing trace injurious substance |
JP3664135B2 (en) * | 2002-01-08 | 2005-06-22 | 九州電力株式会社 | Organic waste liquid treatment method |
KR100623933B1 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2006-09-13 | 한국바이오시스템(주) | Composite electrode for COD measurement |
AU2003901589A0 (en) * | 2003-04-04 | 2003-05-01 | Griffith University | Novel photoelectrichemical oxygen demand assay |
CN101918823A (en) * | 2007-10-17 | 2010-12-15 | 水体检测有限公司 | Water analysis |
CN101307479A (en) * | 2008-01-31 | 2008-11-19 | 上海交通大学 | TiO2 nanometer pore array material preparation method and uses thereof |
CN101221146B (en) * | 2008-01-31 | 2010-10-27 | 上海交通大学 | Method for measuring chemical oxygen demand by TiO2 nano hole array electrode photoelectrocatalysis |
CN101320010B (en) * | 2008-07-21 | 2012-05-02 | 中国科学院长春应用化学研究所 | Application of titanium dioxide nanotube electrode decorated by nano-gold |
-
2010
- 2010-05-24 WO PCT/AU2010/000621 patent/WO2010132957A1/en active Application Filing
- 2010-05-24 AU AU2010251701A patent/AU2010251701B2/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2010132957A1 (en) | 2010-11-25 |
AU2010251701B2 (en) | 2012-11-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2006279258B2 (en) | Water analysis using a photoelectrochemical method | |
Sun et al. | Piezoelectric quartz crystal (PQC) with photochemically deposited nano-sized Ag particles for determining cyanide at trace levels in water | |
Davis et al. | Electrochemical detection of nitrate and nitrite at a copper modified electrode | |
AU2010251701B2 (en) | Water analysis | |
AU2008314501B2 (en) | Water analysis | |
Han et al. | Robust TiO 2/BDD heterojunction photoanodes for determination of chemical oxygen demand in wastewaters | |
JP5284196B2 (en) | Method for quantitative analysis of selenium | |
Daniele et al. | The use of a remote stripping sensor for the determination of copper and mercury in the Lagoon of Venice | |
Jin et al. | Carbon nanotubes and graphene composites used in Cr (VI) detection techniques: A review | |
Bakhsh et al. | Zn/Fe nanocomposite based efficient electrochemical sensor for the simultaneous detection of metal ions | |
Vasu et al. | 2D-layered Bi-functional direct solid-Z-scheme heterogenous vanadium and oxygen doped graphitic carbon nitride single layered nanosheet catalysis for detection and photocatalytic removal of toxic heavy metal | |
Rahman | In-situ preparation of cadmium sulphide nanostructure decorated CNT composite materials for the development of selective benzaldehyde chemical sensor probe to remove the water contaminant by electrochemical method for environmental remediation | |
Lin et al. | Titanium carbide nanoparticles/ion-exchange polymer-based sensor for catalytic stripping determination of trace iron in coastal waters | |
Alias et al. | Metal oxide for heavy metal detection and removal | |
Elfeky et al. | Developing the sensing features of copper electrodes as an environmental friendly detection tool for chemical oxygen demand | |
Jeong et al. | Laser-induced graphene incorporated with silver nanoparticles applied for heavy metal multi-detection | |
Rahm et al. | Impact of physical and chemical parameters on square wave anodic stripping voltammetry for trace Pb 2+ detection in water | |
AU2008255622A1 (en) | Determining chemical oxygen demand in water samples | |
Laskar et al. | Formamidinium iodide for instantaneous and fluorescent detection of Pb 2+ in water | |
Akhoundzadeh et al. | Miniaturized and green method for determination of chemical oxygen demand using UV-induced oxidation with hydrogen peroxide and single drop microextraction | |
Rahman et al. | Electrochemical Detection of ClO _3^-, BrO _3^-, and IO _3^- at a Phosphomolybdic Acid Linked 3‐Aminopropyl‐Trimethoxysilane Modified Electrode | |
Aldstadt et al. | Flow injection method for the determination of arsenic (III) at trace levels in alkaline media | |
Lin et al. | A tin–bismuth alloy electrode for the cathodic stripping voltammetric determination of iron in coastal waters | |
Ding et al. | Photocatalytic Oxidation for Determination of Chemical Oxygen Demand Using Nano‐TiO2 Film | |
Fauziah et al. | Voltammetric Analysis of Pb2+ Ion on Gold Nanoparticles-Modified ZnO Electrode |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FGA | Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent) | ||
PC | Assignment registered |
Owner name: 579453 ONTARIO INC. Free format text: FORMER OWNER(S): AQUA DIAGNOSTIC HOLDINGS PTY LTD |