WO2003056752A1 - To a data network related arrangement (bilateral) - Google Patents
To a data network related arrangement (bilateral) Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2003056752A1 WO2003056752A1 PCT/SE2002/002121 SE0202121W WO03056752A1 WO 2003056752 A1 WO2003056752 A1 WO 2003056752A1 SE 0202121 W SE0202121 W SE 0202121W WO 03056752 A1 WO03056752 A1 WO 03056752A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- document
- central unit
- authority
- information
- arrangement according
- Prior art date
Links
- 230000002146 bilateral effect Effects 0.000 title description 4
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 27
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 26
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/08—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities
- H04L63/0823—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities using certificates
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/12—Applying verification of the received information
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a data network related arrangement and more particularly to such an arrangement that provides an information-carrying and information-transferring facility between connected units and/or stations.
- the inventive arrangement includes a central unit and a number of two-way information transfer units that can co-act with the central unit, said two-way units being referred to as "slave units” in the following text and can be designated “clients” in the case of certain transactions.
- One information transfer mode initialised by the central unit, which in certain transactions can be designated "session", in respect of one or more of the slave units will normally be preceded by an authenticating handshake procedure established therebetween.
- An information transfer mode initialised by a selected slave unit in respect of said central unit shall necessarily be preceded by an authenticating handshake procedure established therebetween.
- a document can be sent from a slave unit to the central unit and vice versa, subsequent to having established an accepted information transfer via said authenticating handshake procedure.
- the present invention finds particular use with regard to exchanging documents between one or more chosen slave units and the central unit, or vice versa, where the document bears or can be provided with an electronic signature applicable to said slave unit.
- electronic signature is meant in the following description that a person authorised to sign a document signs electronically a transmitted electronic document and returns the document duly signed.
- the present invention is primarily based on the establishment of a bilateral session established between two parties.
- This information transfer can then be preceded by an authenticating handshake procedure established therebetween, so as to create thereby conditions, which enable document-related information to be transferred in an accepted and secure fashion.
- an authenticating handshake procedure established therebetween, so as to create thereby conditions, which enable document-related information to be transferred in an accepted and secure fashion.
- a technical problem resides in the ability to create and to configure a data network related arrangement, where an electronic document can be transferred from one or more slave units to a central unit or vice versa, where said document requires an authorised signature from each of a number of authorised signatories each associated with his/her own part of an agreement, and where said document may also include one or more electronic signatures during the interchange phase between said two parties.
- Another technical problem resides in the ability to realise the significance of and the advantages afforded by using in this regard an electronic document that is provided with a text-protected agreement text and/or text-protected signature or signatures and the requirement of one or more necessary further signatures, and to send this document to the central unit from a first slave unit.
- Another technical problem resides in the ability to realise the significance of and the advantages afforded by allowing said check to include at least one of the following criteria: a check to ascertain that the text of the agreement document is protected; a check to ascertain that one or more of the accompanying signatures consists/consist of one or more requisite electronic signatures; and a check to ascertain what other electronic signatures are required in order for the bilateral agreement to be valid and legally binding.
- Another technical problem resides in the ability to realise the significance of and the advantages afforded by allowing each of these remaining parties to sign the document electronically and then to return the document to the central unit, which then checks the contents of the document, such as the text of the agreement, so as to ascertain whether or not the text is still protected, and that the accompanying electronic signatures are authorised signatures.
- Another technical problem resides in the ability to realise the significance of and the advantages afforded by causing the central unit to activate automatically available means for initialising and carrying out the conditions established and chosen in the document and/or the text of the agreement, when the document and/or the agreement has been signed by all authorised parties and duly checked.
- Still another technical problem resides in the ability to create conditions in respect of the central unit such that it can be determined that the person or persons who has/have signed a document is/are truly authorised to sign the document in question.
- Another technical problem is one of being able to realise the significance of and the advantages afforded by allowing said document to contain or to have added thereto information concerning those persons who have the required O 03/056752
- Another technical problem resides in the ability to realise the significance of and the advantages afforded by allowing the central unit to include first means for checking whether or not authority-related information is correct via a register accessible to the central unit.
- a further technical problem resides in the ability to realise the significance of and the advantages afforded by providing the central unit with second means which, when said information is correct, can be initialised and activated such as to allow the central unit to carry out the measures stated in the incoming and duly signed document in accordance with instructions or agreements stated on the document.
- the present invention finds particular application when the central unit consists of or is related to a banking institution or like operator and where said instructions shall be related to an economic transaction and/or to another transaction which is of the utmost importance to the parties in general.
- Another technical problem is allied with allowing said instruction to the central unit to be related to an agreement between two or more parties each having a slave unit, and where the central unit primarily serves as a mediator/data exchange.
- Another technical problem resides in the ability to realise the significance of and the advantages afforded by enabling the central unit to send automatically to each person who shall sign the document electronically in their authoritative capacity in respect of a second party in the document and the agreement, when each person associated with a first party in his authoritative capacity has sent electronically to the central unit his copy of the document containing instructions or agreements and duly signed electronically.
- a technical problem also resides in realising the significance of and ' the advantages afforded by allowing the central unit to include or to co-act with fourth means that functions to assist in carrying out necessary authority checks in an archive or filing department in which relevant powers of attorney are filed.
- a technical problem also resides in the ability to realise the significance of and the advantages afforded by allowing said archive to include a number of organisation identities, such as organisation numbers, current e-mail addresses, legal domiciles, registered offices, seats, certificates relating to private keys, and the like.
- Another technical problem resides in the ability to realise the significance of and the advantages afforded by allowing the central unit to co-act with or to include fifth means adapted for the registration of powers of attorney, where possibilities exist to change stored information, such as the duration of a power of attorney, activation of blocking functions and/or the insertion of new information, where said new information can either be entered via the central unit or via a relevant slave unit.
- Another technical problem resides in the ability to realise the significance of and the advantages associated with allowing such a power of attorney register to include a number of authority codes. Another technical problem resides in the ability to realise the significance of allowing said authority codes to be structured to determine those conditions that are tied to a chosen document with a chosen instruction or a chosen agreement.
- the present invention allows a first authority code to denote that the authority required is the signatures of the entire Board, that a second authority code denotes that the authority required is two or more given persons in combination, a third authority code denotes that the authority required is the signature of the Managing Director (current matters, usual routines), a fourth authority code denotes that the authority required is a message to a member of the Board of Directors, such as the Chairman of the Board, and a fifth authority code denotes that the authority required is a financial power of attorney.
- the present invention thus relates to an earlier known data network related, information-carrying and information-transferring arrangement, which includes at least one central unit and at least a number of slave units that can co-act with the central unit via information- transfer, and where an information-transfer mode initialised by the central unit in respect of one or more of said slave units can be preceded by an authenticating handshake procedure established therebetween, whereas an information transfer mode initialised by a chosen slave unit with respect to said central unit shall be preceded by an authenticating handshake procedure established therebetween, whereafter an electronic document can be sent from a chosen slave unit to the central unit, or vice versa.
- an electronic document provided with protected text and at least one of a number of requisite electronic signatures can be sent to the central unit, said central unit being adapted to check the document automatically with regard to selected and applicable features.
- the check shall involve at least one of the following criteria: a check to ascertain whether or not the text of the agreement document is protected; a check to ascertain whether or not an accompanying signature or signatures consists/consist of at least one of a number of requisite electronic signatures; and a check to ascertain which other electronic signatures are required in order for the agreement to be binding.
- the central unit is also adapted to send said document automatically, bearing at least one electronic signature, to each of the remaining parties that need to sign the agreement text in order for the agreement to be binding.
- Each of these remaining parties sign the document electronically and return it electronically to the central unit, which checks whether or not the text of the agreement document is still protected and that accompanying signature(s) is (are) the signatures of an authorised person(s).
- the central unit will include first means for checking in a register accessible to the central unit whether or not determined and/or delivered authority-related information is correct or not.
- the central unit will cause the activation of second means, which can be initialised to allow the central unit to carry out the measures given in the incoming document, in accordance with the instructions or agreements entered on the document.
- said instruction to the central unit may be related to an economic transaction.
- the instruction to the central unit may be related to an agreement between two chosen slave units, where the central unit shall function as an intermediary.
- the central unit shall include or co-act with third means, which functions to allow the document with its instructions or agreements to be copied on the one hand, and to allow such a copy to be sent to each person who shall electronically sign the document in his/her authoritative capacity on the
- the central unit will function to send automatically a copy of the thus signed document to each person who shall electronically sign the document in his/her authoritative capacity with regard to a second party to the agreement.
- the central unit will include or co-act with fourth means for carrying out requisite authority checks in an archive containing relevant powers of attorney.
- the archive shall include a number of organisation identities, and it is proposed, in accordance with the invention, that these identities will include organisation numbers, current e-mail addresses, company seats, certificates concerning private keys, or the like.
- the present invention also enables the central unit to co-act with or to include fifth means for registering powers of attorney, where the possibility exists of changing stored information, such as the duration of an appointment, activation of a blocking function and/or the addition of new information.
- a number of authority codes may be entered into the power of attorney register.
- a first authority code shall denote that the document must be signed by the entire Board in order for the document to be valid;
- a second authority code shall denote that the document must be signed by two or more given persons in order for the document to be valid;
- a third authority code shall denote that the document shall be signed by the Managing Director (standard issues) in order for the document to be valid;
- - a fourth authority code shall denote that the document must be signed by a member of the Board, such as the Chairman, in order for the document to be valid; and - a fifth authority code shall denote that the required authority is a so-called financial power of attorney.
- the central unit is able to determine and/or to check whether or not determined and/or supplied authority information is correct or not, via an available register, wherewith the central unit is able to take the responsibility of sending a document containing chosen instructions or agreements to each of the authorised persons, and also to receive from each of said authorised persons electronically applied signatures, all during the establishment of an authenticating handshake procedure.
- This provides a functional arrangement, which enables agreement documents or other legal documents to be signed more efficiently without the persons concerned needing to gather in one and the same place where they are known or can identify themselves.
- the invention provides a virtual gathering space and enables an asynchronous session to be carried out.
- a data network related, information-carrying and information-transferring arrangement at present preferred and comprising a central unit and a number of slave units that are able to co-act with the central unit via information transmission, will now be described in more detail by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which;
- Figure 1 is a greatly simplified overview of the data network related arrangement that includes a central unit and a few slave units, which are able to co-act with the central unit;
- Figure 2 is a block diagram illustrating different means and functions assigned to the central unit, which acts in an information transfer mode from and to a slave unit;
- Figure 3 is a simplified function diagram illustrating the co-action between said central unit and a number of slave units in the interchange of a document.
- Figure 1 is a greatly simplified illustration of a data network related, information-carrying and information-transferring arrangement 1.
- the arrangement includes a central unit 10 and a number of slave units 11 , 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16, which are able to co-act with the central unit.
- the invention is primarily concerned with an application established between two parties, a first party "A" and a second party "B” in a bilateral session. This information transfer can be achieved with the aid of each of said slave units, via an information-carrying and information-transferring system "I".
- Internet The data network system "Internet” may well be used in the arrangement illustrated in Figure 1 , said "Internef-system being referenced “I” in Figure 1.
- central unit 10 may exist in a plurality of different units, this being illustrated schematically in Figure 1 by the reference sign 10'.
- a plurality of slave units such as those referenced 11' and 14' can, of course, co-act with the central unit 10 or the central unit 10'.
- each information transfer mode shall be preceded by an authenticating handshake procedure established between relevant parties.
- An information transfer mode initialised in respect of the central unit 10 by a chosen slave unit, such as the slave unit 11 shall be preceded by an authenticating handshake procedure established therebetween.
- a "document” can then be sent from the slave unit 11 to the central unit 10.
- a "document” according to the present invention may conveniently consist of one or more instructions sent from a slave unit 11 to a central unit 10 to enable the central unit 10 to execute the given instructions and report back the measures carried out.
- a "document” according to the present invention may also consist of an agreement that requires a commitment between two or more slave units belonging to a first party "A", such as slave units 11 and 15, wherein the central unit 10 shall be included as an intermediary and/or as a guarantor in respect of an economic transaction.
- a number of slave units such as siave units 1 1 , 15, may be associated with a first party "A" and a second number of slave units 13, 16 may be associated with a second party "B" in respect of an agreement.
- Figure 1 illustrates an information transfer mode, referenced M10, 11 , between the central unit 10 and the slave unit 11 , and an information transfer mode, referenced M11 , 10, between the slave unit 1 1 and the central unit 10. Also shown is an information transfer mode, referenced M10, 15, between the central unit 10 and the slave unit 15, and an information transfer mode, referenced M15, 10, from the slave unit 15 to the central unit 10.
- each information transfer mode that shall be established between the central unit 10 and one or more slave units 13, 16, and vice versa, can be identified by reference signs based on the aforedescribed structure.
- the features of the invention will now be described in more detail with reference to an electronic "document”, with which two authorised electronic signatures are required in order for the document to be legally accepted, wherewith the signed document is sent from the slave unit 11 to the central unit 10.
- the document “D” may contain, inter alia, instructions to the central unit 10 that require said unit to effect a "share purchase” and also to bill the account belonging to the slave unit 11.
- the unit 10 In order for the unit 10 to be able to fulfil these instructions, it is assumed that the unit 10 will require two authoritative electronic signatures from two different persons of which each has a slave unit.
- the unit 10 checks, inter alia, the electronic signature "d2" and when it is found to be correct causes the document to be copied together with the signature and sends the document to a second slave unit 15 for an electronic signature "d3" from an authorised person, whose signature is missing from the document, whereafter the electronically signed document (D') (d1 , d2, d3) is returned to the central unit 10 (M15, 10), which then carries out the instructions and finalises the commission, subsequent to having made an automatic check.
- D' electronically signed document
- M15, 10 central unit 10
- Figure 2 is a principle block diagram illustrating the central unit 10.
- An information transfer mode or session, referenced M10, 11 (M10, 15) initialised by the central unit 10 in respect of one or more of said slave units, such as the unit 11 (15) may be preceded by an authenticating handshake procedure
- An information transfer mode or session initialised by a chosen slave unit 11 (15) in respect of said central unit 10, referenced M11 , 10 (M15, 10) shall be preceded by an authenticating handshake procedure established therebetween, this procedure being illustrated as a function block 21a.
- a document "D" including instructions in accordance with the above is now sent from the slave unit 11 to the central unit 10 and received in a receiving circuit 22a and linked therefrom to a central processor unit 23.
- the central unit 10 co-acts with first means 101 , with the aid of the central processor 23, to determine and/or to check in a register available to the central unit whether or not the determined and/or stated authority information is correct.
- the document “D” will carry information "d6" concerning those persons that are authorised to sign the document, this check being carried out in the unit 10 and in the means 101. It is also conceivable that the document “D” will include an extract from a current registration document.
- the document "D” can be sent to a slave unit 15 for signing, and returned as a document (D') to the central unit 10.
- the measures taken can be initialised with the aid of a circuit 24.
- the document "D” will preferably include or have added thereto one or more pieces of information concerning those persons who have the requisite authority to endorse the instructions or the agreements stated on the document sent to the central unit 10.
- the document “D” includes protected agreement text and/or instructions “d1” and places “d2", “d3” and “d4" where the document shall be signed electronically by authorised persons.
- the document “D” thus includes information concerning those persons that are authorised to sign the document that bears the instructions or the agreement "d1".
- this information may be found stored in the central unit 10.
- the central unit 10 may comprise a bank or some other economic, financial institution and the instructions "d1" sent to the central unit 10 may be related solely to an economic transaction.
- the document "D”, sent to the central unit 10 and bearing said instructions, is primarily related to the central unit.
- This central unit 10 shall thus carry out the commissions stated on the document, such as carry out the economic transaction, and therewith ensure that one account number is billed while another account number is credited, a corresponding sum, wherewith the central unit 10 charges a fee for carrying but the economic transaction.
- the instruction applies to a share purchase or to some similar purchase, and it is assumed that one (or two) further person (persons) is (are) required to sign the document "D". It is assumed that the person sending the document "D" to the central unit 10 is authorised and that he/she can sign his/her name electronically at "d2".
- the unit 10 copies the document "D” signed at “d2", and sends the copy electronically to the e-mail address applicable to the person who shall sign the document electronically at "d3". ; If the document requires the signature of another person at "d4", the document is sent to this person via the output circuit 24.
- the commission can be carried out and finalised immediately the central unit 10 receives the document duly signed at "d2" and at "d3".
- the instruction to the central unit 10 can also be related to an "agreement" between two parties "A” and "B", where one party "A” is assigned the slave units 11 , 15 and the second party "B” is assigned the slave units 13, 16.
- the document “D” passes to the central process 23 in the same way as that earlier described.
- the central processor 23 now co-acts with a third means 103, which is instrumental in copying the document "D" and its associated agreements.
- the central processor 23 can now create conditions which enable such a copy D' to be sent electronically to each person who is authorised to sign the document electronically on behalf of his/her respective party "A" and "B", wherewith each of said persons returns the document to the unit 10 within a given time period and the unit 10 carries out the commission subsequent to checks having been carried out.
- a copy (D) (d1 , d2) is sent to the slave unit 15 for signing and its return to the unit 10, with the aid of an authenticating handshake procedure, wherewith the unit 10 copies the document (D') (d1 , d2, d3) received and sends said document to the slave unit 13 and/or 16.
- the central processor 23 deals with copying of the document "D" that has first been sent from the slave unit 11 to the unit 10, and sends a copy to the slave unit 15.
- the slave unit 15 When the slave unit 15 has electronically signed the document, the document is returned to the central processor 23, which, in a further sequence, sends the document (D') bearing the signatures of the two authorised persons "d2" and “d3" respectively to the second party "B" for signing at "d4".
- the central unit 10 When each responsible person of the first party "A” has duly signed the document carrying said instructions or agreements and has sent the document to the central unit 10, including the central processor 23, the central unit 10 thus sends a copy of the thus completed, signed document bearing said instructions or agreements through the medium of the central processor to each one of the second party "B" required to sign the document in their capacity of an authorised signatory, said copies being sent to each person simultaneously or in succession.
- the central unit 10 that includes the central processor 23 also includes fourth means 104 functioning to carry out requisite authority checks.
- This fourth means has the form of an archive 104, which is able to include a number of different organisation identities, such as organisation numbers, current e-mail addresses, company seats, certificates relating to private keys required to sign presented documents electronically.
- the central unit 10 which includes the central processor 23, co-acts with or includes fifth means 105 for registering powers of attorney, where it is possible to alter stored information, such as the duration of a term of appointment, the activation of blocking functions and/or the insertion of new data, as illustrated with an arrow in Figure 2.
- a number of authority codes are included in the register 105. These authority codes are structured so that conditions tied to a chosen instruction or to a chosen agreement based on a received document can , - e determined.
- a second authority code denotes that the required authority consists in the joint signatures of two or more given persons
- a third authority code denotes that the required authority exists solely in the signature of the Managing Director (routine business matters);
- a fourth authority code denotes that the required authority exists in a message being sent to a board member, such as a document sent to the Chairman of the Board electronically;
- a fifth authority code requires the presentation of a so-called financial power of attorney. More generally, the setup and the use of the arrangement can be generally described as allowing a person represented by the slave unit 1 1 to open a case with the aid of his/her PIN code.
- Such a text can be protected against alterations (or text protected) with the aid of an electronic seal.
- Those persons required to sign the document (d1 , d2, d3, (d4) respectively) in order for the document to be valid and legally binding are then noted, and a critical time frame, such as a date, within which the document shall be signed by all relevant persons may be included.
- the central unit 10 and the central unit processor 23 shall ensure that the "signature" and/ or "signatures” from persons represented by relevant slave units
- the present invention provides the possibility of liberating the signatories concerned from time and space (room) in respect of signing the document, since said parties are allowed to sign the document electronically in virtual space.
- slave units 1 1 , 15; 13, 16 can take part in agreement processes and sign and determine the validity of the document electronically, regardless of the geographical positions of individual slave units.
- the process is able to follow the electronic signatures of the remaining authorised persons synchronously during the actual agreement process, via the central unit 10 and primarily the central processor 23, wherewith the agreement process per se can be completed sequentially and asynchronously. Any updating of the power of attorney register and any power of attorney archive is effected in real time.
- the invention also offers an advanced checking pattern for distribution of the cases in different stages, wherewith termination between the parties, i.e. between selected slave units and the central unit respectively, can be effected via open networks or closed networks, via encryption in the most suitable case.
- Figure 3 is a simplified schematic illustration of a function schedule for co- action between the central unit 10 and a number of slave units 1 1 , 15, when exchanging a document within a first party "A". More particularly, a block 31 indicates the presence of a company certificate, and a block 32 indicates the presence of a private key.
- Reference numeral 33 is intended to illustrate the structure of a compiled document "D” that includes agreement text (d1) and a signature (d2), the text of said agreement being protected via a block 33a.
- Block 33b is intended to show that other information, such as information intended directly for the central unit 34 (10), can be entered in the document "D".
- Such information may include a list of persons who shall sign the document, together with their electronic addresses; any symmetry in the sequence in which the document shall be signed; a time schedule with respect to signing of the document.
- the central unit 34 co-acts with a block 34a representing current "business rules" for current businesses, assignments or commissions.
- Block 34b represents checking surfaces adapted, inter alia, to check the receipt of company certificates 31 , used private keys 32, relevant text protection 33a, public keys, time schedules, etc.
- Block 34c represents an authority register, which either checks that information given on the document "D" is correct or that the document is signed by authorised signatories, in accordance with the structure of the document.
- Block 34d represents a sequence of authorised signatories and/or a list of the signatories required in accordance with the measures concerned.
- This person signs the document via the company certificate 31' and his/her private key 32'.
- the signed document (D') is returned to the central unit 34, which checks the document in control circuits 34b' at least with regard to; a. the correct authority with regard to all persons that have signed the document; b. the correct sequence when this criterion is required; c. the correct electronic signature/signatures; d. the correct time schedule; and e. the correct text protection and a check to ensure that this protection has not been broken.
- the central unit 34 automatically initialises said means 24 so as to allow finalisation of the text decided and chosen in the agreement
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer And Data Communications (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
- Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP02789078A EP1466437A1 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2002-11-21 | To a data network related arrangement (bilateral) |
US10/500,552 US20050149469A1 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2002-11-21 | To a data network related arrangement (bilateral) |
AU2002353707A AU2002353707A1 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2002-11-21 | To a data network related arrangement (bilateral) |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
SE0104351-2 | 2001-12-21 | ||
SE0104351A SE520755C2 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2001-12-21 | Computer networking arrangement (bilateral) |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2003056752A1 true WO2003056752A1 (en) | 2003-07-10 |
Family
ID=20286450
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2002/002121 WO2003056752A1 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2002-11-21 | To a data network related arrangement (bilateral) |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20050149469A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1466437A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002353707A1 (en) |
SE (1) | SE520755C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003056752A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8029883B2 (en) * | 2008-11-25 | 2011-10-04 | Ming Xu | Image receiver media and printing process |
US20150135332A1 (en) * | 2013-11-11 | 2015-05-14 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Deferred Delivery of Electronic Signature Agreements |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1992009161A1 (en) * | 1990-11-16 | 1992-05-29 | Dziewit Halina S | Knowledge based system for document authentication |
WO2001015382A1 (en) * | 1999-08-21 | 2001-03-01 | Kent Ridge Digital Labs | Legitimacy protection of electronic document and a printed copy thereof |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0956673A4 (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 2005-04-06 | Financial Services Technology | Method and system for processing electronic documents |
US20020032659A1 (en) * | 2000-01-27 | 2002-03-14 | Michael Waters | System and method for obtaining and developing technology for market |
-
2001
- 2001-12-21 SE SE0104351A patent/SE520755C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2002
- 2002-11-21 AU AU2002353707A patent/AU2002353707A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-11-21 WO PCT/SE2002/002121 patent/WO2003056752A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2002-11-21 US US10/500,552 patent/US20050149469A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-11-21 EP EP02789078A patent/EP1466437A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1992009161A1 (en) * | 1990-11-16 | 1992-05-29 | Dziewit Halina S | Knowledge based system for document authentication |
WO2001015382A1 (en) * | 1999-08-21 | 2001-03-01 | Kent Ridge Digital Labs | Legitimacy protection of electronic document and a printed copy thereof |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20050149469A1 (en) | 2005-07-07 |
AU2002353707A1 (en) | 2003-07-15 |
EP1466437A1 (en) | 2004-10-13 |
SE520755C2 (en) | 2003-08-19 |
SE0104351L (en) | 2003-06-22 |
SE0104351D0 (en) | 2001-12-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6219423B1 (en) | System and method for digitally signing a digital agreement between remotely located nodes | |
US6367009B1 (en) | Extending SSL to a multi-tier environment using delegation of authentication and authority | |
JP5116920B2 (en) | System and method for electronically exchanging value between distributed users | |
EP0662673B1 (en) | Anonymous credit card transactions | |
US20050114653A1 (en) | Certificate revocation notification systems | |
CN108876669B (en) | Course notarization system and method applied to multi-platform education resource sharing | |
WO1997050205A9 (en) | Digitally signing agreements from remotely located nodes | |
US9361621B2 (en) | System and method for improving reliability of distributed electronic transactions | |
Wang et al. | Achieving secure and flexible m-services through tickets | |
Biddle | Misplaced priorities: The Utah Digital Signature Act and liability allocation in a public key infrastructure | |
Vogt et al. | Supporting fair exchange in mobile environments | |
US7366911B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for computationally-efficient generation of secure digital signatures | |
US20050149469A1 (en) | To a data network related arrangement (bilateral) | |
Hsiung et al. | Bridging e-business and added trust: keys to e-business growth | |
US20050166071A1 (en) | Data network related arrangement (multilateral ) | |
CN113824561A (en) | Novel chain-crossing system based on intelligent contract and trusted computing technology | |
Steves et al. | Properties of secure transaction protocols | |
Muñoz-Tapia et al. | CPC-OCSP: an adaptation of OCSP for m-Commerce | |
CN108900308A (en) | A kind of identity identifying method, apparatus and system | |
Leiner | Policy issues in interconnecting networks | |
CN117056946A (en) | Transaction document determining method, system, electronic device and nonvolatile storage medium | |
Camp | An atomicity-generating protocol for anonymous currencies | |
RU2794054C2 (en) | Automated system for independent confirmation of transactions | |
US20240161071A1 (en) | Fast blockchain payment method and system | |
Bürk et al. | Value transfer systems enabling security and unobservability |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2002789078 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2002789078 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 10500552 Country of ref document: US |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Country of ref document: JP |